Mistshenkoana gracilis ( Chopard, 1925 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4809.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D97D828F-413F-4D9B-B867-E47159C40DD6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687A9-DF41-D701-FF31-3C803D53357F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mistshenkoana gracilis ( Chopard, 1925 ) |
status |
|
Mistshenkoana gracilis ( Chopard, 1925)
( Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Chopard (1925): 327; Chopard (1929): 117; Chopard (1968): 400; Gorochov (1990): 21; Ichikawa et al. (2000): 278
Type material examined (images). Male holotype (MNHN-EO-ENSIF6738, MNHN online collection), Philippines, Mindanao, Butuan, coll. P. I. Baker ; female allotype (MNHN-EO-ENSIF6739, MNHN online collection), Philippines, Western Visayas , Northwest Panay, coll. P. I. Baker.
Remarks. Whether the male holotype and female allotype from two different parts of the Philippines belong to the same species need to be verified. The holotype and allotype differ slightly by apical segment of maxillary palp distinctly enlarged in allotype but less so in holotype; pronotum and legs of holotype homogenously brown but with dark spots in allotype.
New materials collected from Paete and Mount Makiling show that sympatric species can have very similar external morphology, but different male genitalia and that sexual dimorphism is absent in Mistshenkoana . This lends support that the differences in between holotype and allotype are likely to be species variations, especially since the specimens were collected from separate islands belonging to two biogeographic regions.
Notes made by Chopard (1925) about females of ‘ M. gracilis ’ from Luzon are probably also belonging to another species.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.