treatment provided by
Netomocera masneri sp. nov.
Macropterous; fore wing subhyaline ( Fig. 104View Figs 101–106). Clypeal margin shallowly emarginate ( Fig. 99View Figs 96–100). Scrobes reticulate ( Fig. 97View Figs 96–100). Upper face and vertex with eight large setae. Occiput margin sharply defined ( Fig. 98View Figs 96–100). Pronotal collar not unusually long or wide ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Mesoscutum, scutellum and axillae with dense punctulate reticulation ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106); scutoscutellar sutures distinct ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106); frenal area distinct, i.e., sculpture different than on rest of scutellum ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Mesepimeral sulcus conspicuous ( Fig. 101View Figs 101–106). Propodeum ( Fig. 103View Figs 101–106) without a well-defined V-shaped area basally. Fore wing with basal third extensively setose except for narrow bare region ( Fig. 104View Figs 101–106). Visible part of petiole very short, distinctly transverse, with more or less obliterate sculpture ( Fig. 103View Figs 101–106).
Vertex with slight dark green reflections ( Fig. 98View Figs 96–100); POL about 4.1× OOL. MV about 5.3 × SV.
Body colour mainly dark brown ( Fig. 105View Figs 101–106).
The new species is dedicated to Dr. Lubomir Masner, world expert on Platygastroidea ( Hymenoptera ), who collected most of the specimens of the new species (noun in the genitive case).
ECUADOR • ♀; “ ECUADOR, Napo Prov., El Chaco 2000m, 11.II 1983, M. Sharkey, L. Masner ”; right antenna with fu7 and clava missing, on triangular card; CNC.
ECUADOR • ♂; same data as for holotype; CNC.
ECUADOR • 3 ♂♂; same data as for holotype; CNC • 3 ♂♂; “ ECUADOR: Napo, 5 Km S. Baeza 1700m, Feb. 13 1983, Masner & Sharkey”; CNC • 1 ♂; “ ECUADOR: Pichincha, 16 Km. s.e. Santo Domingo Tinalandia , 680 m., 15-30.VI.1975, S&J Peck”; CNC .
Female (habitus: Fig. 96View Figs 96–100)
COLOUR. Head ( Figs 97–98View Figs 96–100) black, with faint dark green reflections mainly on vertex. Mandibles brown, teeth reddish-brown. Antenna ( Fig. 100View Figs 96–100) with scape, pedicel, anellus and basal funicular segments light brown; apical funicular segments (mostly fu6 and fu7) and clava dark brown. Mesosoma ( Figs 101– 103View Figs 101–106) black. Legs light brown except mid coxa and basal part of hind coxa darker. Fore wing ( Fig. 104View Figs 101–106) subhyaline; venation brown; setation brown. Hind wing hyaline. Metasoma with petiole black ( Fig. 103View Figs 101–106). Gaster ( Fig. 96View Figs 96–100) with gt1, syntergum and ovipositor sheaths dark brown, remaining tergites lighter. Body setation including large, symmetrically arranged, setae dark brown.
BODY LENGTH. 1.9 mm.
HEAD. Clypeus mostly coriaceous; apical margin slightly emarginate ( Fig. 99View Figs 96–100); lower face and genae mostly coriaceous ( Fig. 99View Figs 96–100). Scrobes and adjacent areas reticulate, cells elongate ( Fig. 97View Figs 96–100). Vertex reticulate ( Fig. 98View Figs 96–100). Occiput reticulate-striate; margin sharply defined ( Fig. 98View Figs 96–100). Toruli with lower margins about level with lower margins of eyes ( Fig. 97View Figs 96–100). Antenna with flagellum strongly clavate; clava conspicuously asymmetric ( Fig. 100View Figs 96–100). Vertex with eight large setae. Head in dorsal view with width 2.25 × length (90:40) and in frontal view about 1.1× height (90:79). POL about 4.1× OOL (29:7). Eye height 1.4× length (51:37), 2.55 × malar space (51:20) and about 1.2× scape length (51:43). Head width equal to length of pedicel plus flagellum (90:90). Fu1 length about 1.2 × width (7:6); fu7 width 1.4× length (11:8); clava length about 2.3 × width (30:13).
MESOSOMA. Pronotal collar narrower than mesoscutum, with six large setae ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Mesonotum moderately setose dorsally ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Mesoscutum and axillae with dense punctulate reticulation ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Scutellum densely punctulate reticulate, frenal area with shallower reticulation ( Fig. 102View Figs 101–106). Upper mesepisternum alutaceous; lower mesepisternum reticulate ( Fig. 101View Figs 101–106). Mesepimeron virtually smooth, with only short costulae and impressions near posterior margin; mesepimeral sulcus conspicuous ( Fig. 101View Figs 101–106). Propodeum with intricate pattern of carinae, the interspaces shiny but wrinkled ( Fig. 103View Figs 101–106). Macropterous; fore wing uniformly and densely setose except for small, elongate bare region ( Fig. 104View Figs 101–106). Mesosoma length about 1.4 × width (103:72) and 1.45 × height (103:71). Pronotal collar 0.4× as long as mesoscutum (10:25) and 0.75 × as wide as mesoscutum (54:72). Mesoscutum width about 2.9 × length (72:25). Scutellum length 0.95 × width (40:42). Propodeum length about 0.6× scutellum length (23:40). Fore wing length about 2.5 × width (190:75); MV about 5.3× SV (64:12) and 3.2× PV (64:20).
METASOMA. Petiole transverse, mainly smooth, except for some irregular costulae ( Fig. 103View Figs 101–106). Gaster ovate, length about 1.6 × width (130:80) ( Fig. 96View Figs 96–100); gt1 longest, width about 1.1× length (80:70), with hind margin produced; gt2–6 progressively shorter, transverse; syntergum acutely pointed. Ovipositor sheaths slightly protruding beyond apex of gaster. Cercal setae not surpassing apex of gaster.
Male (habitus: Fig. 105View Figs 101–106)
Differs from female mainly as follows. Body length: 1.1–1.3 mm. Body colour brown to dark brown ( Fig. 105View Figs 101–106). Vertex without any metallic reflections. Flagellum brown, basal segments usually slightly lighter ( Fig. 106View Figs 101–106). Fore wing less infumate. Legs paler, mainly yellow, mid and hind coxae light brown. Gaster with gt1 and syntergum brown, remaining tergites with basal half lighter. Fu1 length about 2.8 × width; length of pedicel plus flagellum 2.7–2.9 × as long as head width. Mesepimeral sulcus from barely visible to conspicuous. Fore wing length about 2.3× width. MV about 4.7 × as long as SV. Petiole quadrate. Gaster (inflated) length about 1.4× width, gt1 occupying less than half length of gaster.
Specimens of this species are superficially similar to those of N. merida sp. nov., from which they can be separated by the shape of the clypeal margin, which is slightly emarginate in N. masneri sp. nov. ( Fig. 99View Figs 96–100) and produced in N. merida sp. nov. ( Fig. 110View Figs 107–111). Individuals of the former species are also overall more strongly sculptured, the head of females has distinct metallic reflections ( Fig. 98View Figs 96–100) and the first gastral tergite is longer.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.