Tharsis elleri, Arratia & Schultze & Tischlinger, 2019

Arratia, Gloria, Schultze, Hans-Peter & Tischlinger, Helmut, 2019, On a remarkable new species of Tharsis, a Late Jurassic teleostean fish from southern Germany: its morphology and phylogenetic relationships, Fossil Record 22 (1), pp. 1-23 : 3-13

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5194/fr-22-1-2019

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11047976

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E587D1-2258-AF7B-4630-0C1EFBC5FB7B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Tharsis elleri
status

sp. nov.

Tharsis elleri n. sp.

Figs. 2–11 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 View Figure 6 View Figure 7 View Figure 8 View Figure 9 View Figure 10 View Figure 11

Diagnosis

Moderately large basal teleost of about 200 mm in maximum length that differs from Tharsis dubius in the following characters: head comparatively longer, more than 20 % of standard length versus 20 % in Tharsis dubius . Well-developed autosphenotic versus a comparatively smaller bone in T. dubius . Complete sclerotic ring formed by two bones oriented anteriorly and posteriorly to the eye versus an incomplete ring formed by two separated anterior and posterior sclerotic bones in T. dubius . Moderately short lower jaw with quadrate-mandibular articulation below the anterior half of the orbit versus comparatively longer lower jaw with quadrate-mandibular articulation below the posterior half of the orbit in T. dubius . With 42 or 43 vertebrae versus 47 or 49 in T. dubius . Caudal vertebrae with neural and haemal arches fused to their respective vertebral centra versus neural and haemal arches autogenous in T. dubius . Parapophyses fused to their respective centrum versus autogenous parapophyses in T. dubius . Rudimentary epaxial ray present versus no rudimentary ray in T. dubius .

Derivation of name

The specific name elleri honors Dr. Uwe Eller for his devotion and excellence in preparation of fossils, especially those of the Solnhofen limestone.

Holotype

JME-SOS 08326 is a complete, beautifully preserved specimen of about 190 mm in total length and ca. 163 mm in standard length including soft anatomy preservation (part of digestive system) and squamation ( Fig. 2a, b View Figure 2 ).

Paratype

JME-SOS 08367 is an incomplete specimen, beautifully preserved, lacking pelvic, dorsal and anal fins ( Fig. 2c, d View Figure 2 ).

Type locality and age

Northeastern section of the large Wegscheid Quarry in the community of Schernfeld, near Eichstätt, Bavaria, Germany. Solnhofen lithographic limestone; lower Tithonian, Altmühltal Formation, Hybonotum zone, Riedense subzone, eigeltingense horizon ( Niebuhr and Pürner, 2014; Schweigert, 2015).

Description

A general description is as follows. The fish is ca. 200 mm in total length, slightly fusiform ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ) and with the dorsal fin insertion placed slightly posterior to the midpoint of standard length (55 %). Pelvic fin insertion is at about the midpoint of standard length, slightly in front of the dorsal fin insertion. The caudal peduncle is deep, moderately narrow and about 88 % of the standard length and 40 % of the body depth. The head is proportionally large, about 23 % of the standard length in the beautifully preserved holotype. It has a triangular shape with its three sides having similar lengths, giving the fish a smooth profile. The orbit is moderately large, about 20 % of the head length, and the preorbital region is short, ca. 23 % of the head length. The pectoral fins have a low position, closer to the ventral margin of the body than to the middle region of the flank. The caudal fin presents a characteristic gentle curvature at its dorsal margin so that both lobes of the caudal fin are not symmetric. All exposed surfaces of bones are smooth, without ornamentation and lacking ganoine. The body is covered by large cycloid scales, lacking ornamentation on the free field.

Skull roof and braincase characteristics are as follows. The skull roof is incompletely preserved and/or partially damaged in the holotype and paratype. All bones of the skull roof have smooth surfaces and are not ornamented and have no evidence of a ganoine layer.

According to the contour of the preserved skull roof bones, the dorsal part of the cranium is narrower anteriorly and slightly expanded posteriorly, as is the pattern shown by Tharsis dubius . The main element of the skull roof ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is the parietal bone (frontal) that occupies most of the preorbital region and part of the postorbital region, which is short. Anteriorly, the parietals (frontals) suture with a broad and short mesethmoid ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) that bears two short, narrow lateral processes. The parietals (frontals) are damaged so that the interparietal and postparietal sutures are not discernable. A nasal bone is laterally placed to the anterior part of the parietal (frontal), with its posterior part lying on the parietal in the paratype. The bone is narrow and elongate, mainly carrying the anterior section of the supraorbital canal. Due to poor preservation, the limits among the parietal (frontal), postparietal (parietal) and pterotic are not discernable, except for the autosphenotic, which sutures with the pterotic and partially with the parietal (frontal). The autosphenotic is a large bone forming the dorso-posterior corner of the orbit. It is projected ventrolaterally by a well-ossified process. The pterotic is short and together with the autosphenotic are the main elements that articulate with the hyomandibula. The medial and posterior articulations of the pterotic are unclear because of poor preservation. A deep post-temporal fossa ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ) is observed at the posterolateral surface of the cranium, but its limits with different cranial bones cannot be established, except that of the pterotic. The middle pit-line groove does not extend onto the pterotic. The posterior region of the pterotic is covered by a broad, triangular-shaped extrascapula ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ). The supraoccipital ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ) is small, with a very low crest. The supraorbital canal, as well as the otic canal, were not observed in the studied material due to incomplete preservation.

The orbitosphenoid is very small so that both eyes are separated by an incomplete interorbital septum. The lateral ethmoid is well developed, but its poor preservation does not allow a proper description. A section of the parasphenoid is visible throughout the orbit. There are no teeth associated with the ventral surface of the bone or scattered below the parasphenoid.

Orbit and circumorbital series are as follows. The fish has a moderately large orbit ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) so that the space between the posterior margin of the orbit and the anterior margin of the preopercle is narrow. The series of circumorbital bones apparently encloses the orbit completely, although an antorbital and dermosphenotic are not preserved. The series has preserved a supraorbital and four infraorbitals ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ). There are two large markedly concave sclerotic bones occupying anterior and posterior positions and are sutured to each other ( Figs. 3b View Figure 3 , 5 View Figure 5 ).

The supraorbital ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is an elongate, well-ossified bone that narrows antero-ventrad. It is partially displaced and incompletely preserved in the holotype. An antorbital is not preserved.

Infraorbital 1 (lacrimal) ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a triangular-shaped bone that is heavily ossified close to the orbital margin but is thinly ossified antero-ventrally. Infraorbital 2 ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is partially displaced below infraorbitals 1 and 3 so that its complete length is unknown, but the preserved section reveals that the bone was broader than that in Tharsis dubius . Infraorbital 3 ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a large, broad bone at the posteroventral corner of the orbit. It narrows anteriad so that part of the ectopterygoid and quadrate are exposed laterally; dorsally, infraorbital 3 has a region without sensory tubules that gives the impression that it is an articulatory surface for infraorbital 4. Its posterior margin does not reach the anterior margin of the preopercle, and both bones are separated by a short distance. Infraorbital 4 is displaced and it would form most of the posterodorsal margin of the orbit in life. Its antero-dorsal corner is broken in the holotype. It is a large, broad, slightly square bone. Infraorbital 5 is not preserved, but considering the space left at the posterodorsal region of the orbit, it is assumed that it was the smallest bone of the series.

The infraorbital canal ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ) is enclosed by bone and is of simple type. The main canal is relatively broad in infraorbitals 1 and 3 and narrower in infraorbitals 2 and 4. About eight sensory tubules are preserved in infraorbital 1; they do not reach the ventral margin of the bone. Infraorbital 2 shows two short tubules, and infraorbital 3 has preserved 10 tubules of different length. Infraorbital 4 has two long tubules.

The upper jaw is as follows. Premaxilla, maxilla and two supramaxillae form the upper jaw. The premaxilla ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a slightly triangular bone, with a short, narrow ascendant process and a short oral margin, apparently bearing small, conical teeth, as inferred by the presence of a few small tooth sockets.

The maxilla ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is narrow and gently curved and slightly shorter than the lower jaw, not covering the lateral aspect of the quadrate. Its posterior end is below the anterior half of the orbit. Its articulatory anterior region is bent and looks short in the holotype; in contrast, it is longer in the paratype. The ventral margin is gently convex, and its posterior margin is truncated in the holotype; it is not preserved in the paratype. An incomplete row of a few minuscule sockets for teeth is present in the oral margin.

Two supramaxillae ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) cover most of the dorsal margin of the maxilla in the holotype, whereas they are displaced in the paratype. Supramaxilla 2 has a broad, expanded body and a narrow, long antero-dorsal process that covers half of the dorsal margin of supramaxilla 1, which is slightly ovoid, with its posterior margin truncated.

The lower jaw is as follows. The jaw ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is relatively short, with the quadrate-mandibular articulation placed below the anterior half of the orbit. The jaw is formed laterally by two bones – the dentary (dentalosplenial of Nybelin, 1974) and angular. The suture between both bones reveals that the dentary forms most of the jaw. From a narrow mandibular symphysis, the dentary expands abruptly dorsoposteriad, producing a massive and high coronoid process that is thicker and strongly ossified at the antero-dorsal region of the coronoid process. The latter has a small contribution of the angular. A very narrow “leptolepid” notch is observed in the paratype under normal light, just in front of the massive anterior margin of the coronoid process. A tiny bone at the posteroventral corner of the angular may be the retroarticular. This region is unclear in the holotype because the angular presents an irregular surface at this corner. The postarticular process is short.

A surangular is not present at the posterodorsal corner of the jaw. Since the jaw is preserved in lateral view in the holotype and paratype, presence or absence of coronoid bones and prearticular bones cannot be verified, but they are absent in Tharsis dubius .

The mandibular canal is positioned near the ventral margin of the jaw, and it opens to the surface by a few small pores lying on the bony canal. Pores have not been observed in the posteroventral region of the angular, so it is assumed that the mandibular canal exits here medially.

Most of the palatoquadrate, suspensorium, hyoid arch and urohyal are partially hidden below other bones so that the description is restricted to a few elements.

A small section of the ectopterygoid ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is visible in front of the quadrate. The quadrate ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is slightly triangular and has a comparatively small, slightly rounded condyle for the articulation with the lower jaw and an elongate posterodorsal process inclined slightly ventrally. The complete length of the posterodorsal process of the quadrate and of the symplectic is unknown because the bones are covered by the anterior margin of the preopercle. A displaced bone, which is interpreted here as a possible metapterygoid ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is observed in the paratype. The hyomandibula ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a narrow, long bone slightly inclined antero-ventrad. Its dorsal region articulating with the cranium is well ossified and continues ventrally as a well-ossified narrow shaft that presents an anterior membranous flange up to its mid-length. The dorsal portion of the hyomandibula is narrow and apparently has only one elongate articular condyle with the braincase. The opercular process is well ossified and closer to the cranial articulatory surface of the bone than to its middle region. The main shaft of the bone has no expansion or process at its ventro-posterior margin. Considering the length of the jaw and the position of the quadrate-mandibular articulation, the symplectic is assumed to be a long bone that is partially exposed in the holotype; an alternative possibility is the presence of an elongate cartilaginous articulatory region filling the space between the ventral margin of the hyomandibula and the dorso-posterior margin of the symplectic.

The lower part of the hyoid arch preserves a small section of the anterior ceratohyal in the holotype that is uninformative. The urohyal is not preserved.

The opercular and branchiostegal series are as follows. The preopercle ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a large and triangular-shaped bone, which is expanded posteroventrad. It lacks a slightly rounded flange just anterior to the curvature of the preopercular canal and a notch at the posterior margin of the bone is not present. Its dorsal arm is longer than the ventral one, almost reaching the posterolateral margin of the pterotic. The preopercular canal ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ) gives off many tubules, filling the ventral arm and part of the dorsal arm. The tubules are very delicate, simple and narrow, one next to the other, and open irregularly near the posteroventral margins of the bone in the holotype. A few long tubules bear – at mid-length – a very short branch ending in a small pore in the paratype.

The opercle ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is broken in the holotype and paratype, but still it is possible to see it as a large bone with its dorsal margin gently rounded, whereas its anterior and posterior margins are almost straight, and the ventral margin is markedly oblique. The surface of the bone is smooth, with its anterior margin thickened and heavily ossified in the paratype. The subopercle ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is large, as broad as the opercle and slightly smaller. Although its ventral margin is broken, it is possible to observe that it is gently curved, with a well-developed antero-dorsal process. The partially displaced interopercle ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is covered by the posterior margin of the preopercle so that its complete shape and size are unknown.

There are nine short branchiostegal rays associated with the anterior ceratohyal, plus seven other displaced rays lying below the articulated branchiostegal rays and three other broad, large posterior elements just below the interopercle and subopercle that likely articulate with the posterior ceratohyal ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ). Therefore, about 20 rays can be counted in the holotype. However, and by comparison with Tharsis dubius , it could be possible that the number was higher. A gular plate has not been observed.

Vertebral column, intermuscular bones and ribs are as follows. There are 42 or 43 vertebrae, including preural centrum 1; from these, 24 or 25 are abdominals or precaudals so that the caudal region is shorter than the abdominal one. The first four or five vertebrae are covered laterally by the opercle. All vertebrae are heavily ossified, and their lateral surfaces ( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 5 View Figure 5 ) are covered by a series of small pits and grooves that give the vertebrae a smoother surface than that found in Tharsis dubius . The centra are slightly deeper than long in the abdominal–precaudal region, whereas they are squareshaped anteriorly and posteriorly ( Fig. 2c, d View Figure 2 ). The preural centra are slightly deeper than long, and the ural centra are reduced in size. All centra lack pre- and postzygapophyses.

The neural arches of the abdominal vertebrae ( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7 ) are autogenous, and the halves of each arch are unfused medially. Each epineural process emerges at the posterolateral margin of the arch. The neural spines are shorter than the epineural processes, and they are slightly inclined posteriorly toward the horizontal below the dorsal pterygiophores. The short parapophyses ( Fig. 6b View Figure 6 ) are fused to the antero-lateral portion of the centrum, near its ventral margin. The head of each rib articulates with a small articular cavity present in each parapophysis.

The neural arches of the caudal vertebrae ( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 6a, b View Figure 6 ) are fused to their centra, except in the first two that are unfused or show incomplete lines of suture in the holotype; they have characteristic elongated processes at the dorsal margin of the arch. They are long and directed anteriorly in the preural region, whereas they are characteristically curved in precaudal vertebrae ( Fig. 6a View Figure 6 ). All haemal arches are fused to their respective centrum. The neural and haemal spines of the caudal region are narrow, with the exception of those of the preural centra. The neural and haemal spines are moderately inclined toward the body axis in the precaudal region, increasing their inclination caudally. The haemal spines ( Fig. 6a View Figure 6 ) are short, not extending between the anal pterygiophores, except for the first two. The neural and haemal spines of the mid-caudal region are ossified, lacking an internal core of cartilage; however, the condition changes in the preural region (see below).

There is an unclear condition of the haemal arch and spine in the first caudal centra ( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ), with a complete haemal arch closed ventrally and a haemal spine that is not a ventral continuation of the arch but appears to be separated. This condition is lost in more posterior vertebrae showing a “normal” arch and spine.

The total number of ribs cannot be counted precisely because scales cover them in the holotype, whereas they are not preserved in the paratype. The ribs are well ossified and reach close to the ventral margin of the body. The ribs are narrow along their length but slightly expanded at their proximal small articulatory heads. The last pair is positioned anterior to the first anal pterygiophore.

Supraneural bones are not preserved or are covered by other structures. The epineural processes of the neural arches ( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 6a View Figure 6 ) extend along the abdominal region, ending close to the last dorsal pterygiophore. The epineural processes are long, extending laterally along the space occupied by several centra. They are thin, but heavily ossified, and curved posterodorsally, with the exception of the last ones, which lie closer to the dorsal margin of the centra than to the tips of the neural spines. Only a few fragments of epipleural bones are preserved.

Pectoral girdles and fins are as follows. The bones of the pectoral girdle and fins are poorly preserved. The posttemporal is observed in medial view in the paratype ( Figs. 2c, d View Figure 2 , 3b View Figure 3 ). It is a relatively small bone, with a rounded, posterior end, broadening anteriorly and with a well-ossified dorsal process for articulating with the cranium. The ventral arm is not observed due to the position of preserved bone. The main lateral line is not observed.

The supracleithrum ( Figs. 3b View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is incompletely preserved in the holotype, but it seems to be an elongate bone. It is broad at its dorsal tip, but narrowing ventrally; however, its mid-region is damaged. The trajectory of the lateral line is not observed. The cleithrum ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) is a heavily ossified bone with a long dorsal limb that only has its anterior margin preserved. The cleithrum is slightly expanded at its posteroventral corner and becomes narrower at its short, ventral limb. The number of postcleithra and their characters cannot be described due to poor preservation.

The scapula and coracoid ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ) are preserved in the holotype, but they are not informative. Four elongate proximal radials are observed in the paratype ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ), with the first and last ones being shorter than the second and third proximal radials.

The pectoral fin ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ) is positioned near the ventral margin of the body. The total number of pectoral rays is unknown, but 10 rays are preserved in the right fin, whereas ca. 14 rays are preserved in the left fin in the paratype. All rays have very long bases and are scarcely branched (one branching in most of them) and scarcely segmented distally. In addition, there are two structures in the paratype that may be pectoral axillary processes lying on one of the pectoral fins ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ).

Pelvic girdles and fins are as follows. The pelvic girdles ( Fig. 6a View Figure 6 ) are poorly preserved in the holotype and are missing in the paratype. A large well-ossified, triangular basipterygium (pelvic plate) is preserved in the holotype. The posterior part of the basipterygium is thick and retains a large core of cartilage, but it is incomplete so that it is not possible to determine the presence of a posterior process or not. Both pelvic fins are displaced and together so that the number of rays per fin cannot be determined. The pelvic rays have long bases, but not as long as the pectoral rays.

Dorsal and anal fins are as follows. The dorsal fin ( Figs. 2a, b View Figure 2 , 6a View Figure 6 ) is incompletely preserved with its rays partially displaced so that a total number of dorsal fin rays cannot be provided, but considering that the holotype has about 15 dorsal pterygiophores preserved, this could indicate that the fin has more than 15 rays.

The first dorsal pterygiophore ( Figs. 6a View Figure 6 , 8a View Figure 8 ) is a large complex bone that expands antero-ventrally and has several processes that are preceded by a flat bony flange that gives a characteristic shape to the first pterygiophore. Pterygiophores 2–4 are of similar length, whereas most posterior pterygiophores decrease slightly in size and thickness posteriorly. The basal or proximal radial portion of the pterygiophores, except the first one, are triangularly shaped. There is no information available concerning middle radials and distal radials because of conditions of preservation.

Only a few incomplete rays and fragments of the first pterygiophores of the anal fin are preserved.

The caudal fin and endoskeleton are as follows. The caudal fin and endoskeleton are well preserved in the holotype and paratype. The caudal fin ( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ) is deeply forked, with very short middle principal rays compared to the long, leading marginal rays; the lobes are slightly asymmetric due to a slight bend of the dorsal or epaxial lobe.

Five or six preural vertebrae support the caudal rays. The preural vertebrae ( Figs. 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ) are characterized by their smooth surfaces covered by series of small pits and some small ridges, and their broad dorsal and ventral arcocentra are fused to their respective centrum. The preservation of the neural spines of preural vertebrae 5–2 suggests they have a central core of cartilage surrounded by a thin perichondral ossification. In the vertebrae that are completely preserved, an anterior process at the base of neural spines 4 to 2 is preserved. Neural spines 5 to 2 are elongate but decrease in length posteriorly, whereas the neural spine of preural centrum 1 is shorter (or even may be absent) than the preceding ones. The haemal spines of preural centra 5–1 are broader than their respective neural spines, especially haemal spines 3–1. However, the haemal spine of preural vertebra 5 is narrower. The haemal spines of the preural vertebrae are heavily ossified chondral elements.

The neural and haemal arches of preural vertebra 1 ( Figs. 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ) are fused to their centrum. A complete neural arch, with a rudimentary spine, is present on preural centrum 1. The haemal arch and its broad parhypural are fused to the centrum. A well-developed hypurapophysis on the lateral wall of the haemal arch of preural centrum 1 is observed in the holotype and paratype.

Three or four ural centra (of the polyural terminology; or two centra of the diural terminology) are associated with their respective hypurals. An elongate first ural centrum bears hypurals 1 and 2 ( Figs. 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ), whereas the longer posterior ural centrum is associated with hypurals 3 and 4. A long arch bearing its spine is present above ural centra 1 and 2.

The complete number of uroneurals is unclear. The holotype has five preserved uroneurals ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) distributed in a series of four elongate ones and one short one placed at a different angle. The paratype also has the anterior series of four long uroneurals and in addition two small uroneurals. The first uroneural is the longest of the series and extends anteriad, reaching the lateral surface of preural centrum 3; it extends even further in the holotype. The second uroneural reaches the lateral surface of preural centrum 3 or 2, and the third uroneural reaches the lateral surface of preural centrum 1. The fourth uroneural is short, reaching anteriorly the lateral surface of ural centra 1 and 2 or the bases of hypurals 1 and 2 that are fused at their bases. Uroneural 5 is smaller, fusiform shaped and oriented almost parallel to the bases of the dorsal principal rays (in the holotype), but after comparison with Tharsis dubius , it is assumed here that the uroneural is displaced from its position. There are three short, narrow epurals in the holotype, but two are preserved in the paratype.

Seven hypurals ( Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ) are preserved in the paratype, and still there is space for two more. Hypurals 1 and 2 are continuous at their bases, and they are not fused to the autocentrum of ural centra 1 and 2. Hypural 1 is the longest element of the series, and hypural 3 is the broadest. However, hypural 3 is not completely preserved in the paratype. The breadth of the hypural diastema is unclear. Hypurals 1 and 2 ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) are partially covered by the expanded bases of the middle principal rays (e.g., rays 10 and 11). Principal rays 8 and 9 ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) have well-developed dorsal processes at their bases.

The holotype has three epaxial basal fulcra preserved, one rudimentary epaxial ray, one fringing fulcrum, 19 principal rays and at least five hypaxial procurrent-segmented rays; there are four other ray bases that could belong to hypaxial basal fulcra or procurrent rays ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ). One long and slightly fusiform dorsal scute and a slightly shorter ventral scute precede the epaxial and hypaxial lobes, respectively.

The anterior epaxial basal fulcra ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) are elongate, leaflike elements that expand laterally, partially covering the next fulcrum in the holotype. The elongate fringing fulcrum lies between the distal tip of the epaxial rudimentary ray and the dorsal margin of the first principal ray. It is unclear whether a tiny additional fulcrum is present at the distal end of the fringing fulcrum or the fringing fulcrum is damaged distally. The epaxial rudimentary ray ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) has a short base and at least two segments (see definition of this kind of ray in Arratia, 2008).

A total of 10 principal caudal fin rays are articulated with hypural 2 plus all dorsal-most hypurals. The bases of the principal rays may reach hypural 2 ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ) due to the bend of the dorsal lobe of the caudal fin. The articulation among segments of most principal rays is mainly Z or step like, whereas the articulation among segments of the inner principal rays is mainly straight.

Two well-developed, elongate urodermals (sensu Arratia and Schultze, 1992) lie on the bases of the first and second principal rays in the holotype ( Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ).

Scales are as follows. Thin, large cycloid scales of about 3 to 5 mm in length in the holotype cover the whole body. No radii are observed. Each scale has circuli around a small focus, and the circuli are only missing at the posterior part of the scale ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ). Poorly preserved remnants of scales are observed on the lateral surface of some caudal fin rays.

The intestine is as follows. A portion of the intestine is preserved on the holotype ( Figs. 2a, b View Figure 2 , 6a View Figure 6 ). The filled intestine from stomach (pylorus) to anus is preserved in the holotype. The intestine is straight as in Clupea ( Harder, 1975: fig. 130) and does not show loops as in advanced or herbivorous teleosts, nor a spiral valve as in primitive actinopterygians. The filling consists of an amorphous mass with pieces of bones and scales.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Trochida

Family

Skeneidae

Genus

Tharsis

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF