Bordaia, Tindale, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/002229300299282 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E58794-284B-426F-FFDC-FD526EE281C0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-08-27 01:23:24, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-04 22:52:53) |
scientific name |
Bordaia |
status |
|
BORDAIA Tindale, 1932 View in CoL
BORDAJA; Chu and Wang, 1985a, mis-spelling
pica Tindale, 1932 (Bordaia) View in CoL Australia moesta Tindale, 1932 (Bordaia) View in CoL Australia furva Tindale, 1932 (Bordaia) View in CoL Australia paradoxa Tindale, 1932 (Bordaia) View in CoL Australia karnka Tindale, 1941 (Bordaia) View in CoL Australia
CHU, H. F. and WANG, L. Y., 1985 a,`Insect ± herb' versus hepialids with descriptions of new genera and species of Chinese Hepialidae, Sinozoologia, 3, 121 ± 134.
TINDALE, N. B., 1932, Revision of the Australian ghost moths (Lepidoptera Homoneura, family Hepialidae). Part I, Records of the South Australian Museum, 4, 497 ± 536.
TINDALE, N. B., 1941, Revision of the ghost moths (Lepidoptera Homoneura, family Hepialidae). Part IV, Records of the South Australian Museum, 7, 15 ± 46.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Bordaia
Nielsen, Ebbe S., Robinson, Gaden S. & Wagner, David L. 2000 |
karnka
Tindale 1941 |
pica
Tindale 1932 |
moesta
Tindale 1932 |
furva
Tindale 1932 |
paradoxa
Tindale 1932 |