Spermophilinus bredai (VON MEYER, 1848)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2020.011 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E51069-FFD3-FF8E-2A9F-04C8FE6EFDDD |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Spermophilinus bredai (VON MEYER, 1848) |
status |
|
Spermophilinus bredai (VON MEYER, 1848)
Text-figs 1 View Text-fig , 2 View Text-fig
M a t e r i a l a n d m e a s u r e m e n t s. Right upper jaw with (abnormal) P3, P4 and all molars (NMA-2019- 1/2352; Text-fig. 1 View Text-fig ). Measurements (L × W in mm): P4: 1.38 × 1.74; M1: 1.64 × 2.06; M2: 1.71 × 2.13; M3: 2.08 × 2.05.
C o m p a r a t i v e m a t e r i a l. Left upper jaw with P3–M1 from the same locality (NMA-2019-2/2352; Textfig. 2). Measurements: P3: Di: 0.54, H: ~0.38; P4: 1.44 × 1.65; M1: 1.68 × 2.05.
D e s c r i p t i o n. NMA-2019-1/2352. The fragmentary maxilla conserves the P3–M 3 in situ. The specimen is adult as shown by the wear stage of the teeth.The P3 is not recognizable as such. The crown of the tooth or teeth is/are broken. This break reflects the original condition of the specimen and does not result from damage due to, for example, screen washing of the fossil-enriched sediment. Two posteriorly-directed roots are developed in front of the P4, between the two anterior roots of the last premolar. A very small third root emerges in front of the anterolabial root of the P4. The lingual root is the strongest. The morphology of Spermophilinus molars is well known and, thus, deserves no detailed description. We only notice that the parastyle is not significantly developed in the P4. P4–M3 have a strong, crest-shaped mesostyle. It forms a bridge between the paracone and metacone (P4), or is directed rather towards the labial part of the tooth (M1, M2). The crest is observed in the M3, but included in the expanded posterior part of the tooth. The M1 differs from M2 by the metacone which is more clearly labially differentiated, the protocone which has a more central position, as well as the less well-achieved metalophid/protocone junction.
NMA-2019-2/2352. The specimen shows less trace of tooth wear. The P4 has a parastyle completely included in the anteroloph. The P3 is complete, uniradicular, posteriorly directed, and placed between the anterolabial root and lingual root of the P4. The crown of the tooth is conical and comes into contact with the P4 under the hypothetical parastyle.
R e m a r k s. The molars show the characteristics of Spermophilinus , a genus relatively common in the German middle Miocene (see details in Ziegler 2005, for instance). To be brief, four known species of Spermophilinus ( S. besana , S. bredai , S. turolensis and S. giganteus ) differ essentially in size. It has long been accepted that these species represent a lineage characterized by an increase in molar size. Bosma et al. (2018) have recently changed this view by demonstrating the presence of two coexisting species of Spermophilinus in a single site in Anatolia. It is out of the scope of this paper to review the German record in order to discuss the specific homogeneity, and we, thus, consider the Bavarian fossil populations to be monospecific in each locality.
The early and middle Miocene Spermophilinus collections from the Upper Freshwater Molasse were considered to be assigned to S. aff. bredai for the older localities while S. bredai is found in younger ones (e.g., Ziegler and Fahlbusch 1986, Kälin 1993). Ziegler (2005; following de Bruijn 1995) considered that the smaller and older species belong to S. besana . The measurements of M1 and M2 from selected localities in Switzerland and southern Germany are shown in the Text-fig. 3 View Text-fig . It emerges that it becomes difficult to clearly separate the species in a stratigraphic framework. The use of the average tooth size for all selected localities would certainly have added more clarity to present the evolution of the genus, but would not have allowed us to discuss in detail the size of our specimens (some molar samples are indeed too small). Pending further study of the Petersbuch 136 material, the studied specimens do not oppose a taxonomic assignment to S. bredai .
It is important to note for the following discussion that we consider the tooth shown in Text-fig. 2 View Text-fig as a P3 and not as a DP3 that has not been replaced.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.