Orthomorpha alutaria, Likhitrakarn, Natdanai, Golovatch, Sergei I. & Panha, Somsak, 2010

Likhitrakarn, Natdanai, Golovatch, Sergei I. & Panha, Somsak, 2010, The millipede genus Orthomorpha Bollman, 1893 in Thailand. 1. Revision of the sericata - group, with descriptions of four new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae), Zootaxa 2361, pp. 23-45 : 32

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.193638

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6199309

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E3878E-FF93-FFCD-E584-FF0EFA9CF85C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Orthomorpha alutaria
status

sp. nov.

Orthomorpha alutaria View in CoL sp. n.

Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 E & F, 7 & 8.

Material examined: Holotype male ( CUMZ), Thailand, Lop Buri Province, Khok Samrong District, Khao Wong Phrachan Temple, 14°58´0˝N, 100°41´49˝E, 8 August 2008, leg. S. Panha and members of Animal Systematics Research Unit. Paratypes: 14 males, 3 females ( CUMZ), 2 males, 1 female ( ZMUC), 2 males, 1 female ( ZMUM), same data as holotype. 1 male, Thailand, Uthai Thani Province, Lan Sak District, Thep Mueang Thong Temple, 15°24´59˝N, 99°35´37˝E, 7 June 2008, leg. C. Sutcharit. 1 female ( CUMZ), same Province, Thap Than District, Khao Patawe Temple, 15°28´31˝N, 99°45´28˝E, 13 June 2006, leg. S. Panha and members of Animal Systematics Research Unit. 1 female, same Province, Ban Rai District, Tham Khao Wong Temple, 15° 1´59.82˝N, 99°27´18.42˝E, 8 July 2009, leg. C. Sutcharit.

Name: To emphasize the smooth, leathery tegument both of prozona and metaterga.

Diagnosis: Differs from congeners in the dull, microgranulate tegument, primarily the vertex and metaterga, combined with the evident frontal incision on the paraterga and the lower setigerous knobs on the metaterga, albeit these are not as strongly developed as those in O. enghoffi sp. n., and in the irregularly axeshaped tip of the solenophore (much as in O. enghoffi sp. n.).

Description: Length 22–27 mm (male), 23–27 mm (female), width of midbody pro- and metazona 1.9– 2.1 and 3.2–3.9 mm (male), 2.3–2.6 and 3.3–4.0 mm (female), respectively in most specimens. One paratype (male from Thep Muang Thong) 22 mm long, 1.6 and 2.8 mm wide on pro- and metazona, respectively. Holotype 26 mm long, 2.1 and 3.3 mm wide on pro- and metazona, respectively. Live coloration ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A) blackish-brown, head and antennae blackish as well, paraterga and epiproct contrastingly pale orange, legs brownish; coloration in alcohol ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B–J) blackish-brown, head and antennae dark brown, paraterga and epiproct contrastingly yellow, legs and venter light grey-brown.

Main characters as in O. enghoffi sp. n., except as follows.

Vertigial part sparsely setose. Collum with 3rd row of setae not borne on knobs; paraterga small, caudally narrowly rounded, obtusangular, declined flaps ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 C).

Tegument smooth and dull, prozona and metaterga delicately leathery ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A–J), only hind edge of metaterga in places microgranulate to rugulose; surface below paraterga finely microgranulate and in places often rugulose as well. Metaterga with two transverse rows of setae, pattern traceable as 2+ 2 in anterior row without knobs and 2(3)+2(3) in posterior row, borne on tiny knobs at rear edge of metaterga. Tergal setae much shorter, about as long as 1/6–1/4 of metazonum, usually retained only in anterior row. Paraterga welldeveloped ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B–H), usually slightly upturned to subhorizontal, paraterga 3–7 lying about level to, others usually only slightly below dorsum (male), or all paraterga lying below dorsum (female). Anterior edge of paraterga 2 and 3 strongly convex and bordered, of paraterga 4–8 slightly convex. Lateral edge of paraterga 2 with 2–3 incisions in anterior half ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 B). Lateral edge of paraterga 3 and 4 with slightly less evident incisions ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 B). Lateral incisions on paraterga 5–16 stronger than those in O. subsericata , but usually less strong than in O. enghoffi sp. n. Caudal edge of paraterga usually slightly fringed or with small notches, sometimes with traces of a midway lobule ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 D). Posterior edge of poreless paraterga more concave. All paraterga behind collum at least very slightly surpassing tergal contour. Ozopores evident, lateral. Transverse sulcus barely traceable, incomplete on segments 4 and 18, complete on metaterga 5–17, superficial, lineshaped, reaching bases of paraterga, finely, and only at places, beaded at bottom ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B & D). Pleurosternal carinae traceable only as small, caudal, sharp tooth on segments 2–7 ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 C), as faint tubercle on segment 8 (male), or as faint caudal tubercle only on segments 2–8 (female). Tip of epiproct often more broadly emarginate than in O. enghoffi sp. n. ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 F & G). Ridge in front of gonopod aperture lower, not as prominent as in O. enghoffi sp. n. Sternal lamina between male coxae 4 as pair of low, bilobate cones ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 I & J). Legs a bit shorter than in O. enghoffi sp. n., about 1.4 (male) or 1.2 times (female) as long as midbody height; male legs 1 and 2 with incomplete tarsal brushes.

Gonopods ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 E & F, 8) much like in O. enghoffi sp. n., but tip slightly more axe-shaped.

CUMZ

Chulalongkorn University Museum of Natural History

ZMUC

Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen

ZMUM

Zoological Museum, University of Amoy

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF