Choroterpes nigrescens, Barnard, 1932
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5711.2.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80A54B17-760E-4E0F-9CD3-F6983D0EBE37 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E38784-FF8C-FFED-FF54-0176B142FE89 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Choroterpes nigrescens |
| status |
|
Differences between Ch. nigrescens View in CoL and Ch. ndebele
These two South African species are similar in general appearance of larvae, subimago and imago and most reliably differs by the following characters:
In larva: Labrum in Ch. ndebele has usual shape ( Figs 22–24 View FIGURES 20–27 ), in Ch. nigrescens —with unusually deep median incision ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–27 ). Other larval characters distinguishing these species are setation of legs, denticles on abdominal terga and shape of sternum IX in male (see above).
In winged stages (subimago and imago of any sex): Hind wing in Ch. ndebele has usual shape ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 71–75 ), in Ch. nigrescens —with unusually reduced apical part ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 71–75 ).
In male imago (besides hind wing structure), Ch. ndebele and Ch. nigrescens differ by structure of penis ( Figs 78 and 82 View FIGURES 76–83 ).
In female subimago and imago (besides hind wing structure): Egg of Ch. ndebele has two polar caps consisted of large papillae pressed together; hidden longitudinal rods are undulate, with a row of vesicles between rods of each pair ( Figs 90–98 View FIGURES 90–98 ). Egg of Ch. nigrescens has no polar caps; its hidden rods are straight, and vesicles are absent ( Figs 84–89 View FIGURES 84–89 ). Eggs of these two species can be distinguished using light microscope.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
