Eucholoeops Ameghino, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2014n2a2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4538767 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E187D7-DE13-D964-FF2D-FB13FB7BFEC7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eucholoeops Ameghino, 1887 |
status |
|
Genus Eucholoeops Ameghino, 1887
TYPE SPECIES. — Eucholoeops ingens Ameghino, 1887 .
DIAGNOSIS. — Much smaller than the Plio-Pleistocene grounds sloths but larger than Holocene and extant tree sloths; shares with other megalonychids large C1 and c1, prominent diastema, anteriorly divergent tooth rows, with caniniforms displaced laterally to remaining teeth, and oval to rectangular molariforms; muzzle prominent, short and broad, but less so than in Ahytherium and Megistonyx ; differing from Megalonyx in possessing caniniforms that are triangular in section and a longer mandibular spout; differing from other megalonychids with triangular caniniforms (e.g., Choloepus , Acratocnus Anthony, 1916 , Neocnus Arredondo, 1961 ) in having dorsoventrally deep, rather than anteriorly tapered, rostrum; differing from other megalonychids in possessing transversely expanded M2 and M3; width across buccinator fossae much less than width at preorbital rostrum; preorbital rostrum width greater than that of postorbital constriction; posterior surface of lacrimal markedly concave.
DISTRIBUTION. — Santacrucian SALMA (late Early Miocene), Santa Cruz Province, Argentine Patagonia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.