Bruneastrum, Gnezdilov, 2015

Gnezdilov, Vladimir M., 2015, Description of a new genus and species of Hemisphaeriini from Brunei with an identification key to the Bornean species of the tribe (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Issidae), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 55 (1), pp. 9-18 : 10-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4503863

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D69294C8-0182-4F35-9565-3C1823B9FD17

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4601034

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E12E35-0734-6576-818E-FCA328153879

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Bruneastrum
status

gen. nov.

Bruneastrum View in CoL gen. nov.

Type species. Bruneastrum cardinale View in CoL sp. nov., here designated.

Diagnosis. Metope smooth, with no intermediate carinae visible ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–4 , 13 View Figs 11–14 ). Metope and coryphe joining at obtuse angle in lateral view ( Fig. 12 View Figs 11–14 ). Coryphe transverse ( Figs 4 View Figs 1–4 , 14 View Figs 11–14 ). Fore wings without hypocostal plate, with basal angle of costal margin distinctly convex (semicircular) ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–4 , 12 View Figs 11–14 ). Hind wings unilobed ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–4 ), reaching abdominal apex. Hind tibia with 2 lateral spines. First metatarsomere with 5 intermediate spines in full row. Phallobase with a pair of long, curved latero-apical processes, narrowing apically ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–10 , laphp) and with a pair of ventro-lateral lobes ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–10 , vlphl). Aedeagus lacking ventral hooks.

Description. Metope smooth, with rudimentary median carina only in its apical part and without sublateral carinae, elongate, enlarged above the clypeus ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–4 , 13 View Figs 11–14 ). Lateral keels (margins) of metope visor shading the antennae in dorsal view ( Figs 11, 14 View Figs 11–14 ). Metopoclypeal suture distinct, straight. Postclypeus large, smooth, with thick median carina running through the anteclypeus as well. Metope and coryphe joining at obtuse angle (in lateral view); metope visible from above ( Figs 11, 12 View Figs 11–14 ). Coryphe transverse, twice as wide as long medially, with anterior margin convex and posterior margin weakly concave ( Figs 4 View Figs 1–4 , 14 View Figs 11–14 ). Ocelli absent. Pedicel 1.5 times as long as wide, cylindrical. Pronotum very short, nearly 5 times shorter than mesonotum, without carinae; anterior and posterior margins keel-shaped. Paradiscal fields of pronotum very narrow, not visible behind the eyes. Paranotal lobes large, without carinae. Tegulae large. Mesonotum smooth, without carinae. Fore wings smooth, wide, narrowing apically, with distinctly convex (semicircular) basal angle of costal margin ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–4 , 12 View Figs 11–14 ); fore wings without hypocostal plate, with setae on costal margin. Claval suture of fore wing distinct only basally, disappearing after ¼ of wing length ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Hind wings unilobed, well-developed, reaching abdominal apex, with long and dense setae on costal margin ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–4 ). Hind tibiae with 2 lateral spines distally. First metatarsomere with 2 lateral and 5 intermediate spines in full row apically. Second metatarsomere with only 2 latero-apical spines. Male genitalia ( Figs 5–10 View Figs 5–10 ). Pygofer wide, with convex hind margin (in lateral view) ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–10 ). Anal tube wide (in dorsal view), with deep apical concavity ( Fig. 9 View Figs 5–10 ). Anal column long, 0.3 times as long as whole anal tube ( Fig. 10 View Figs 5–10 ). Phallobase curved at obtuse angle (in lateral view), wide (in ventral view) ( Fig. 5 View Figs 5–10 ), with a pair of long latero-apical processes curved at right angle and narrowing apically ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–10 , laphp) and with a pair of ventro-lateral lobes ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–10 , vlphl). Ventral phallobase lobe wide, reaching phallobase apex. Aedeagus lacking ventral hooks. Style massive, with hind margin concave ( Fig. 7 View Figs 5–10 , hms). Capitulum of style on short neck ( Fig. 7 View Figs 5–10 , n), wide (in dorsal view) ( Fig. 8 View Figs 5–10 ), with distinct lateral tooth, apical tooth very weak. Differential diagnosis. Bruneastrum gen. nov. is similar to the genus Mongoliana Distant, 1909 with which it shares a distinctly convex (semicircular) basal angle of the fore wing costal margin ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–4 , 11–12 View Figs 11–14 ), but differs from the latter by the absence of aedeagal ventral hooks in males.All species of Mongoliana (known from mainland China) have well-developed ventral hooks of aedeagus ( FENNAH 1956, fig. 18B; CHE et al. 2003). Bruneastrum gen. nov. differs from the genera Hemisphaerius Schaum, 1850 and Gergithus Stål, 1870 (both known from Borneo, see below) by more elongate fore wings ( Fig. 12 View Figs 11–14 ).

Etymology. Derived from the combination of the Greek noun άστρο (star) and Brunei which means a “star of Brunei ” (gender neutrum).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Issidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF