Rubus phoenicolasius Maximowicz (1872: 160)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.515.1.1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8066974 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE3646-FFA6-FFF4-FF43-FAF9FDD2F909 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Rubus phoenicolasius Maximowicz (1872: 160) |
| status |
|
18. Rubus phoenicolasius Maximowicz (1872: 160) View in CoL View at ENA .
Lectotype following information in Kurtto et al. (2010)
Pictures: —https://rubus-nederland.nl/nl/soorten/systematische-namenlijst/32-braam-genus-rubus-l/framboossubgenus-idaeobatus-focke-focke/197-r-phoenicolasius-maxim
Note: —This species is characterized by long dark red bristles both on the primocane and in the inflorescence. It cannot be confused with any other taxon in the region. For a full description and the difference with R. ellipticus Smith (1819 : nr. 16), which was found near Durban, see Sochor (2019).
Distribution in South Africa: — Rubus phoenicolasius grows in the region only around Hogsback, Eastern Cape.
Specimen:— SOUTH AFRICA. Eastern Cape: Amatole Mountains near Hogsback, along Hogsback Pass , 9 November 1984, Phillipson 937 ( PRE) .
| PRE |
South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |