Conus aristophanes G. B. Sowerby
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4441.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA806CA1-9019-49B4-9931-DF86F0707314 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5998653 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DCD230-FFC4-874C-FF3E-FAFF838A7A16 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Conus aristophanes G. B. Sowerby |
status |
|
Conus aristophanes G. B. Sowerby View in CoL II
( Fig. 1P–S View FIGURE 1 )
Localities: Agatti, Amini, Androth, Bitra, Chetlet, Kadmat, Kalpeni, Kavaratti, Kilton and Minicoy
Habitat: Rocky intertidal, lagoons, inner reef platform, sea grass bed, sandy shores
Depth: 0.2– 8 m
Specimens examined, observed: 20, 137
Length: 18–27 mm
Remarks: This is the first report of C. aristophanes from India, and a new distribution record for the central Indian Ocean. The species-level distinction between the largely sympatric C. coronatus and C. aristophanes remains uncertain. Cernohorsky (1964, 1978) pointed out consistent shell morphological differences between them in Fiji. The most striking of these is fewer spiral striae on the sutural ramps: 1–2 vs. 4–7 in C. coronatus (see Fig. 1Q View FIGURE 1 ). Puillandre et al. (2014: Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) reported a genetic distance of about 10% between the two based on three mitochondrial genes, a disparity that usually indicates species-level distinction. Prior to that study, Röckel et al. (1995) and Coomans et al. (1981) had concluded conspecificity based on morphology. We tentatively consider them distinct, but further study remains necessary.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Conoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |