Amphelictus fortunensis Eya & Chemsak, 2003

Monné, Miguel A. & R, Juan Pablo Botero, 2011, Synonymical notes on Neotropical Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera), Zootaxa 2928, pp. 64-68 : 65

Amphelictus fortunensis Eya & Chemsak, 2003

( Fig. 4 )

Amphelictus fortunensis Eya & Chemsak, 2003a: 14 , figs. 2, 3; Monné, 2005; Swift et al., 2010: 12. Amphelictus jumerim Martins & Monné, 2005: 48 , fig. 47; Swift et al., 2010: 12 syn. nov.

Amphelictus jumerim was described from Pichincha, Ecuador and A. fortunensis from Chiriquí, Panama. The comparison of the holotype and paratype, both males, of A. jumerim and the original description and figures of A. fortunensis allow us to propose the new synonymy.

Specimens examined. PANAMA, Chiriquí: El Hato del Volcán, Quebrada Tisinga, (1400 m), male, 10.V.1980, Porion-Bertrand. leg. (paratype of A. jumerim , MNRJ); ECUADOR, Pichincha: Tinalandia (Road Quito-Santo Domingo, 650m), male, 18.II.1980, Porion-Bertrand leg. (holotype of A. jumerim , MNRJ).

Geographical distribution. Costa Rica, Panama and Ecuador.

Figures

FIGURES 1 – 9. 1, Curitiba brunni (Lameere), neotype female; 2, Curitiba scheerpeltzi (Tippmann), holotype female; 3, Curitiba brunni (Lameere), male; 4, Amphelictus jumerim Martins & Monné, holotype male; 5, Amphelictus novellus Martins & Monné, holotype male; 6. Amphelictus aibussu Martins & Monné, paratype male. 7, Amphelictus abaiba Martins & Monné, holotype female; 8. Paraphaula porosa Fuchs, holotype male; 9, Udamina leprieurii Thomson, male.