Parabopyrella mortenseni
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1842535 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D987BD-FF91-FFED-FEC9-FC05ABA8F95F |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Parabopyrella mortenseni |
status |
|
Parabopyrella mortenseni View in CoL (Nierstraz and Brender à Brandis, 1929)
Figures 1 View Figure 1 (d), 7; Table 1
Bopyrella mortenseni Nierstrasz and Brender à Brandis, 1929: 30 View in CoL , 31, figs. 34–37 [type locality: St. Thomas , Virgin Islands, parasitising Lysmata wurdemanni ] . – Chopra, 1930: 137–138. – Shiino, 1933: 282. – Danforth, 1963: 7. – Chace 1970: 60 [ Bahía de Turiamo , Estado de Aragua, Venezuela, parasitising L. rathbunae ] . – Danforth, 1970: 9, 43, 60, 61, 151, fig. 7c-d. – Markham, 1974: 193–195, 316, 322. – Bourdon, 1980: 187 in key, 218–221, 224–225, fig. 15, table 4 [re-examination of types]. – Bourdon, 1981: 1144. – Markham, 1982: 345. – Markham, 2009: 227. – Markham, 2010: 160.- An et al. 2015: 47.
Bopyrella Mortenseni. View in CoL – Monod, 1933: 235.
not Bopyrella Mortensni View in CoL [sic]. – Qazi, 1959: 60, 61, figs. 7, 8.
Probopyrus sp. – Van Arman and Smith, 1970: 133–135, figs. 1, 2 [Biscayne Bay, Florida, U.S. A., parasitising L. wurdemanni (cited as Hippolysmata wurdemanni )]. – Anderson, 1977: 248. – Bursey, 1978: 569.
‘branchial bopyrids’. – Chace, 1972: 73 [ Antigua Island, parasitising Alpheus viridari View in CoL ].
Parabopyrella mortenseni View in CoL . – Markham, 1985: 73–78, figs. 32–35. – Markham, 1988: 57 table 1. – Kensley and Schotte, 1989: 112 table 2. – Markham and Donath-Hernández, 1990: 243. – Camp et al. 1998: 133 table 2. – Román-Contreras and Martínez-Mayén, 2011 [Laguna de Términos, Campeche, Mexico, parasitising A. viridari View in CoL ]: 1145–1148, 1150. – Kazmi and Yousuf, 2013: 131. – An et al. 2015: 48, 59, 61 in key. – Romero-Rodríguez and Martínez-Mayén, 2018: 1183–1184. – Ribeiro et al. 2019: 2440.
Parabopyrella mortensi [sic]. – Boyko, 2006: 41–43.
Material examined
One juvenile female, one male ( CNCR 34975 ) parasitising one female of Alpheus normanni ( CNCR 7584 ), P . Flores det. host; Champotón , Campeche, Mexico (19º29 ʹ 52.30”N, 90º42 ʹ 15.6”W); J GoogleMaps . L GoogleMaps . Villalobos coll.; 20 January 1987. One juvenile female ( CNCR 35023 ) parasitising one ovigerous female of Alpheus cristulifrons Rathbun, 1900 ( CNCR 20339 ), M . Camacho det . host; Mahahual , Quintana Roo, Mexico (18º42 ʹ 54.70”N, 87º42 ʹ 24.4”W); D GoogleMaps . Domínguez coll GoogleMaps .; 9 March 1996.
Distribution
Southern Florida, U.S.A., US Virgin Islands to Venezuela ( Markham 1985).
Remarks
The examined female, paired with a male (CNCR 34975), was considered juvenile because it has a nearly symmetrical body ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 (e)) and the five pairs oostegites were not fully developed; nevertheless, it agrees with most of the criteria proposed for P. mortenseni ( Nierstrasz and Brender à Brandis, 1929; Bourdon 1980, both as Bopyrella mortenseni ; Markham 1985). The slightly sinuous inner ridge observed on their first pair of oostegites ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a)) agrees with that reported for another juvenile female of this species ( Markham 1985). Some structures of the lone juvenile female (CNCR 35023) are much less developed, e.g. the oostegites are a tiny triangular-shaped plate closely to the pereopods and the barbula has a small bulge on each corner. Other features matched well with those reported for P. mortenseni : the head fused medially with the first pereomere but separated by anterolateral notches ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)), the antennules and antennae composed of three and two segments each, respectively, both tipped by setae ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (c)), the maxillipeds with a conspicuous setose palp on its anterior margin ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (d)) similar to that illustrated by Bourdon (1980, Figure 15(b)) and Markham (1985, Figure 32(e)). Some variations include pereopods with rounded projection on their basis not so broad and the pleomeres are clearly distinct though they are not separated by lateral notches ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)), as was noted by Markham (1985) for a juvenile female of P. mortenseni . The pleotelson of this juvenile female is longer than wide and with the posterior margin entire and rounded ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)) and the first three pairs of pleopods are semicircular shaped and biramous but the posterior ones are reduced to a tiny branch.
The male ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 (d)) attached to the juvenile female (CNCR 34975) also fits well the description of P. mortenseni . In general, it resembles the male illustrated by Markham (1985, Figure 35) with pereopods of similar sizes but on the first three pairs, the dactylus is stouter and acute than in posterior ones. The pleon is fused into a single piece, wider than the last pereomere, with slight ventrolateral trace of segmentation, with the posterior margin almost straight, and lacking setae ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 (d)).
The juvenile female and male were in the right branchial chamber of a female A. normanni of 5.00 mm CL; whereas the single juvenile female was in the right branchial chamber of an ovigerous females A. cristulifrons of 3.64 mm CL, carrying 14 embryos at an early stage with a mean length of 0.48 ± 0.01 and width of 0.46 ± 0.01 mm, and a mean volume of 0.05 ± 0.004 mm 3. The measurements of the females and male of P. mortenseni are shown in Table 1.
Throughout its range of distribution, P. mortenseni was known to parasitise only shrimps of the family Lysmatidae such as Lysmata rathbunae Chace, 1970 and L. wurdemanni ( Gibbes, 1850) ( Markham 1985; Kensley and Schotte 1989). Later it was found in the Gulf of Mexico and Mexican Caribbean parasitising the alpheid Alpheus viridari ( Armstrong, 1949) ( Román-Contreras and Martínez-Mayén, 2011) , and it is herein reported from A. cristulifrons , recognised for the first time as host to a bopyrid, and A. normanni . Boyko (2006) recognised as accidental the association of P. lata and L. boggesi and noted the absence of records of Parabopyrella parasitising shrimps of two different families, which is now the case.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Parabopyrella mortenseni
Romero Rodríguez, Jesús & Álvarez, Fernando 2021 |
Parabopyrella mortensi
Boyko CB 2006: 41 |
Parabopyrella mortenseni
Ribeiro FB & Porciuncula-Horch A & Williams JD 2019: 2440 |
Romero-Rodriguez J & Martinez-Mayen M 2018: 1183 |
An J & Boyko CB & Li X 2015: 48 |
Kazmi QB & Yousuf F 2013: 131 |
Camp DK & Lyons WG & Perkins TH 1998: 133 |
Kensley B & Schotte M 1989: 112 |
Markham JC 1988: 57 |
Markham JC 1985: 73 |
Probopyrus sp.
Bursey CR 1978: 569 |
Anderson G 1977: 248 |
Van Arman JA & Smith AC 1970: 133 |
Bopyrella
Qazi MH 1959: 60 |
Bopyrella
Monod T 1933: 235 |
Bopyrella mortenseni Nierstrasz and Brender à Brandis, 1929: 30
An J & Boyko CB & Li X 2015: 47 |
Markham JC 2010: 160 |
Markham JC 2009: 227 |
Markham JC 1982: 345 |
Bourdon R 1981: 1144 |
Markham JC 1974: 193 |
Chace FA Jr. 1970: 60 |
Danforth CG 1970: 9 |
Danforth CG 1963: 7 |
Shiino SM 1933: 282 |
Chopra B 1930: 137 |
Nierstrasz HF & Brender A & Brandis GA 1929: 30 |