Neischnocolus cisnerosi, Peñaherrera-R & Guerrero-Campoverde & León-E & Pinos-Sánchez & Falcón-Reibán, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5351.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB041A7B-0589-4033-9A61-72DA6D2EB833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392067 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887C4-FFB6-067A-F1FB-D5DAFD0101A0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neischnocolus cisnerosi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neischnocolus cisnerosi sp. nov.
Figures 2C, D View FIGURE 2 ; 3B View FIGURE 3 ; 4C, D View FIGURE 4 ; 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7
Type material. Holotype male, Ecuador, province of Santo Domingo de Los Tsachilas, parish of Santo Domingo, Reserva Otongachi— Fundación Otonga, Wet Forest , (- 0.320000 º S, - 78.950000º W, 947m), 6 October 2017, F. Velasquez. Museo de Zoología , Universidad San Francisco de Quito , Quito, Ecuador (ZSFQ-i11100). GoogleMaps
Etymology.— The specific epithet is a patronym for our mentor Diego Francisco Cisneros-Heredia, an amazing scientist, fantastic friend, and awe-inspiring teacher, who has always been at the start of our professional journeys, and encouraged us to pursue our epistemophilia. Always open to the reception of junior students and fellow researchers at IBIOTROP (Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical USFQ), Diego has consistently offered and supported unique and eccentric projects for students and researchers alike. We dedicate this species to his impact, past, present, and future on our scientific endeavours through life.
Diagnosis.— Males differ from those of other species by the morphology of the male palpal organ, having a R keel, similar to N. iquitos ; but it can be easily differentiated by the presence of a PAC keel, PS and PI keels non-serrated, and disperse MDGA rounded-shaped over ventral surface; whereas N. iquitos have a PI keel proximally serrated, PAC keel and MDGA absent in N. iquitos ( Kaderka, 2020) .
Description.— Male holotype (ZSFQ-i11100) ( Fig. 2C, D View FIGURE 2 ): Total length: 14.23. Carapace length: 8.52, width: 7.57. Abdomen: length: 5.73, width: 5.52. Eyes: anterior and posterior eye rows slightly recurved, AME: 0.30, ALE: 0.24, PME: 0.33, PLE: 0.14, AME-AME: 0.35, AME-ALE: 0.17, PME-PME: 0.90, PME-PLE: 0.17, ALE-PLE: 0.36, OQ length: 1.21, width: 1.87, clypeus: 0.21. Fovea deep and straight. Chelicerae: 9 promarginal teeth and 11 denticles. Labium: length: 0.71, width: 0.90, with 9 cuspules. Maxillae: 68–71 cuspules on inner third Sternum: length: 3.71, width: 3.16. Legs: formula 4123, total length: I 32.57, II 30.91, III 26.33, IV 33.76; leg (femur/patella/ tibia/metatarsus/tarsus) and pedipalp (femur/patella/tibia/cymbium) articles length: I 9.02/4.07/8.32/6.75/4.41, II 8.63/3.96/8.31/5.74/4.27, III 7.71/3.13/647/5.67/3.35, IV 9.03/3.57/7.88/9.28/4.00, palp 4.77/2.73/4.42/1.75. Tibia I with paired distal proventral apophyses with one short and wide spine on inner side of each branch ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Flexion of metatarsus retrolateral with respect to tibial apophyses. Palpal tibia with two distal conical processes, both processes point towards each other ( Fig. 4C, D View FIGURE 4 ). Scopula: tarsi I–II densely scopulated, tarsi III–IV slightly scopulated, tarsi I–II distally divided by rhomboidal group of setae, tarsi III fully divided by straight strip of longer thicker setae, tarsi IV fully divided by wide strip of longer thicker setae. Metatarsal scopula: I 80%, II 55%, III 25%, IV 0%. Legs and pedipalp spination: Femora and patellae I–IV and palp 0. Tibiae I 1r; II 2V, 1P; III 2V, 2P; IV 3V, 1P, 1R; palp 0. Metatarsi I 2V; II 2V, 2R; III 4V, 2P, 2R; IV 6V, 1P, 5R. Tarsi I–IV and palp 0. Palpal bulb ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ): Bent embolus almost perpendicular to palpal organ axis, short and slightly curved apical portion of the palpal organ, PI keel well developed and longer than PS keel, PAC keel very short and weakly developed, R keel short and well developed, PS and PI keels non-serrated, PS keel short than P keel, A keel present, developed TH, disperse MDGA rounded-shaped over distal ventral surface.
Colour.— In vivo ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ), carapace slightly reddish; carapace, chelicerae, abdomen and legs densely covered by small pale yellowish setae, almost metallic, and dispersed long reddish setae; abdomen with a small grey dot above the urticating setae patch; spinnerets overall pale orange (Velásquez, pers. comm., 25/08/2023). Colour after five years in preservative similar to colour in life, except setae on carapace are golden ( Fig. 2C, D View FIGURE 2 ).
Females: Unknown.
Distribution.— Known only from type locality ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). The specimen was collected in the northern foothill evergreen forest of western slope of the Andean Cordillera (sensu Mae, 2013); within the Western Province (sensu Morrone, 2014).
Remarks.— The left palpal bulb of male holotype shows deformities so it was not considered for the description of this species; having the middle part of the bulb more bent and irregular, from the retrolateral view the superior area has the appearance of a horizontal fold.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |