Storenomorpha joyaus ( Tikader, 1970 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.707 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1878F531-70CD-4294-88A7-A96291B60801 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4329819 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887BA-FF94-167A-FD92-FD4EFB3BF81F |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Storenomorpha joyaus ( Tikader, 1970 ) |
status |
|
Storenomorpha joyaus ( Tikader, 1970) View in CoL
Fig. 12 View Fig
Homalonychus joyaus Tikader, 1970: 6 , figs 2a–c.
Genus (?) joyaus – Roth 1984: 3. — Brignoli 1976: 211.
Storenomorpha joyaus View in CoL – Jocqué & Bosmans 1989: 129, figs 10–12. — Sen et al. 2015: 93, pl. xx, figs 536–540. — Dhali et al. 2017: 89, pl. xxvi, figs 480–484.
Type material
Holotype
INDIA • subadult ♀; West Sikkim, Bank of Great Rangeet (= Rangit) River ; 20 Sep. 1959; B.K. Tikader leg.; NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number specified).
Paratypes
INDIA • 4 subadult ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number specified) .
Allotype
INDIA • subadult ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number specified).
Note
We examined the holotype, paratypes and allotype of S. joyaus ( Fig. 12 View Fig A–E) and found that these were all subadults, thereby, the morphology of its female genitalia remains yet unknown. Jocqué & Bosmans (1989) described the male of this species based on non-type material deposited in BMNH, London, that were collected in Sikkim. Without referring this, Sen et al. (2015) claimed that they had provided the first description of the male of S. joyaus . It is surprising that, even though they had two female specimens at hand, they never attempted to illustrate its genitalia, instead illustrated the male genitalia that was already well illustrated ( Jocqué & Bosmans 1989: figs 11–12).
Remarks
The ZSI collection has three glass tubes for this species. First tube labeled as “ holotype ” (no register number) contains one subadult female specimen in good condition, with intact genitalia. Second tube labeled as “ paratype ” (3232/18) contains four subadult female and one juvenile specimens in good condition. Third tube labeled as “ allotype ” (3231/18) contains one subadult male specimen in good condition.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Storenomorpha joyaus ( Tikader, 1970 )
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2020 |
Storenomorpha joyaus
Dhali D. C. & Saha S. & Raychaudhuri D. 2017: 89 |
Sen S. & Dhali D. C. & Saha S. & Raychaudhuri D. 2015: 93 |
Jocque R. & Bosmans R. 1989: 129 |
Homalonychus joyaus
Tikader B. K. 1970: 6 |