Palmocarpon cretaceum, MIQUEL, 1853
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D8879D-FFF5-A65B-F01F-C4E478E0FDF0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Palmocarpon cretaceum |
status |
|
Palmocarpon cretaceum not on Bosquet’s lists
Curiously enough, Bosquet never mentioned Palmocarpon cretaceum in his detailed and annotated lists of fossils from the Maastrichtian type area (e.g., Bosquet 1860, 1879, 1881), neither as Palmocarpon cretaceum , nor synonymised. He included 11 other species described by Miquel (1853), omitting only a few indistinct fossils. Possibly, the foreign nature of Van Breda’s material was recognised only after its description. This is supported by the fact that the specimen does not occur under the name Palmocarpon cretaceum in the hand-written inventory of Van Breda’s collection and the “Aperçu général” (Anonymous [undated]: 13), but as “fruit figured by Miquel” and “fruit? figured and described by Prof. Miquel”, respectively. Countering this supposition, however, is that in the “Aperçu général” the locality is still given as Maastricht. Furthermore, if it was recognised as foreign, we do not understand why Bosquet did not correct Miquel.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.