Corythalia flagrans, Bayer & Höfer & Metzner, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4806.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:722DB6C9-2C18-48EB-B202-7F2AFF47F49F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3490EE5B-D56D-4F40-A7C0-113C14B1166C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:3490EE5B-D56D-4F40-A7C0-113C14B1166C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Corythalia flagrans |
status |
sp. nov. |
Corythalia flagrans View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 4A View FIGURE 4 , 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 60D, 67C, 70G
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3490EE5B-D56D-4F40-A7C0-113C14B1166C
Type material. Holotype: ♂, BRAZIL: Acre: Rio Branco, Reserva Humaitá , 9°45’00”S, 67°40’12”W, about 150 m a.s.l., leg. Exp. SMNK / IBSP, 10–13 Apr. 1996, in secondary forest, interim deposition SMNK-ARA 02861 , final deposition IBSP 209868 View Materials . GoogleMaps
Etymology. The specific name refers to the similarity of the long, narrow, slightly curved distal section of the embolus of the male holotype resembling the beak of the sunbird Aethopyga flagrans Oustalet, 1876 ; term (specific epithet) in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males distinguished from those of all other Corythalia species by the following characters in combination: embolus (E) long, broad, strong, complex, with several longitudinal ridges ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C, 70G) and distally with retrolatero-distal, long and narrow extension having retrolateral orientation ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C) and prolatero-distally with flat and stout, very broad conical and small process; distal margin of base of E (EB) in ventral view by far not reaching distal margin of tegulum (T) (gap almost as long as EB itself) ( Figs 49A View FIGURE 49 , 67C View FIGURE 67 ); cymbium alveolus centro-distally with quite broad extension, converging distally and pointing towards distal section of embolus ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B); RTA relatively long (slightly longer than width of T) and with dorsal serration ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C, 70G).
Description. Male: total length 6.4, carapace length 3.0, maximal carapace width 2.1, width of eye rectangle 1.9, opisthosoma length 2.6, opisthosoma width 1.8, fovea length 0.28. EYES: AME 0.66, ALE 0.42, PME 0.09, PLE 0.36, AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.07, PME–PME 1.61, PME–PLE 0.24, ALE–PLE 0.70, PLE–PLE 1.3, clypeus height at AME 0.30, clypeus height at ALE 0.72. Cheliceral furrow with 1 promarginal and 1 retromarginal teeth. SPINATION: palp without spines. Legs: femur I 1400, II 1500, III 1600, IV 1600; patella I 1000, II 1010 {1000}, III–IV 1010; tibia I 2002 {2003}, II 3014, III–IV 3133; metatarsus I 2014, II 2024, III 3134, IV 4144{4145}. MEA- SUREMENT OF PALP AND LEGS: palp 2.6 [1.0, 0.4, 0.3, 0.9], I 5.2 [1.6, 0.9, 1.1, 1.0, 0.6], II 5.3 [1.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.0, 0.6], III 6.7 [2.1, 1.0, 1.4, 1.5, 0.7], IV 6.7 [1.9, 0.9, 1.5, 1.8, 0.6]. LEG FORMULA: 3&421 (legs III & IV with exactly the same length). COPULATORY ORGAN: embolus (E) long [slightly longer than width of tegulum (T)], complex, broad, with several longitudinal ridges and retrolatero-distally with long, light and narrow extension having retrolateral orientation and prolatero-distally with broad conical, flat and small process ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C); width of embolus base (EB) circle> 2/3, but <3/4 the width of T; EB located prolatero-centrally at pre-subdistal part of T; T narrower than cymbium ( Figs 49A View FIGURE 49 , 67C View FIGURE 67 ); sperm duct double-stacked S-shaped, occupying minimally more than 1.2 but clearly less than 2/3 of T from retrolateral; proximal tegulum lobe not recognisable as such, but T proximally moderately converging and proximal ending broad rounded (even though irregularly in having somewhat retrolateral orientation), covering about distal half of palpal tibia; cymbium alveolus centro-distally with quite broad extension, converging distally and pointing towards distal section of embolus; cymbium in ventral view distally conically converging, at distalmost section rounded; palpal tibia short, broader than long ( Figs 49A View FIGURE 49 , 67C View FIGURE 67 ) and ventral tibial bump in ventral view quite large, distally rounded, located proximally in prolateral half of palpal tibia and reaching beyond prolateral margin of palpal tibia in ventral view ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C); RTA in ventral view moderately narrow, long (slightly longer than width of tegulum, narrower than embolus at central section), with almost distal direction and with dorsal (or better prolateral if such a straight distally directed RTA is viewed ventrally) serration ( Figs 49 View FIGURE 49 A–B, 67C), in retrolateral view dorsal serration much more clearly recognisable and RTA with ventro-distalmost section narrow and slightly converging but tip still rounded ( Figs 49B View FIGURE 49 , 70G View FIGURE 70 ). COLOURATION: see genus description for conservative aspects. Carapace dark red-brown ( Fig. 60D View FIGURE 60 ). Legs brown to red-brown, except for several articles lighter (see genus description) ( Fig. 60D View FIGURE 60 ). Opisthosoma like noted in genus description under general dorsal colouration, however central transversal band just moderately broad and chevron-like patch in central band missing; posterior band distinctly separated medially; with large, light beige patch reaching medially from central band up to posterior band and converging somewhat in posterior direction ( Fig. 60D View FIGURE 60 ).
Female: unknown.
Remarks. The long, strong, broad and complex embolus, the proximally rounded and quite elongated tegulum and the (long) slender RTA (especially if viewed ventrally) are similar to C. valida and C. tribulosa sp. nov. so we expect a close relationship between these three species. Corythalia flagrans sp. nov. additionally shares the conspicuous and large ventral tibial apophysis with C. tribulosa sp. nov., however, lacks the apophyses centrally on the embolus that are present in the other two species mentioned in this paragraph.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Acre, Brazil.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |