Heterocordylus (Heterocordylus) cytisi Josifov, 1958
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.937.2571 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7E02539C-95F7-482D-88CF-4D0884583EE5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12092550 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D8033C-4D05-1751-FE60-FA694634FED0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Heterocordylus (Heterocordylus) cytisi Josifov, 1958 |
status |
|
Heterocordylus (Heterocordylus) cytisi Josifov, 1958 View in CoL
Fig. 9B View Fig
Material examined
TURKEY – İzmIr ProvInce • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Ödemiş, Bozdağ; 24 May 1978; F. Önder leg.; on Leguminosae ; LEMT .
Comments
A Balkanian species that lives on Chamaecytisus spp. ( Fabaceae Lindl. ) and captured together mostly with H. (H.) leptocerus (Kirschbaum, 1856) and rarely with H. (H.) genistae (Scopoli, 1763) ( Josifov 1958; Kment & Baňař 2012; Kment et al. 2013b). Due to its close resemblance to both species, it was repeatedly overlooked or misidentified in the literature ( Kment & Baňař 2012; Kment et al. 2013b). Males of the newly recorded species can only be reliably distinguished from these two species by the different shape of parameres. However, females can be distinguished by the shape of second antennal segment which is cylindrical in H. leptocerus , cylindrical in the basal ⅓ and strongly inflated in the apical ⅔ in H. cytisi and gradually inflated throughout its whole length in H. genistae ( Fig. 9B View Fig ) ( Josifov 1958). Additionally, females of H. cytisi and H. genistae are distinguished by different shapes of squama covering the base of ovipositor ( Kment et al. 2013b).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |