Cryptoplax burrowi (E.A. Smith, 1884 )

Dell’Angelo, Bruno, Gori, Sandro, Baschieri, Leonardo & Bonfitto, Antonio, 2010, Chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora) from the Maldive islands, Zootaxa 2673 (1), pp. 1-38 : 26-32

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2673.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D7EE78-FFCD-FF95-FF7F-FB11FAF9B6C8

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Cryptoplax burrowi (E.A. Smith, 1884 )
status

 

Cryptoplax burrowi (E.A. Smith, 1884) View in CoL

( Figures 11A–L View FIGURE 11 , 12R–X View FIGURE 12 , 13O–R View FIGURE 13 , 14B–C View FIGURE 14 )

Chiton (Chitonellus) burrowi E.A. Smith 1884: 85 .

Cryptoplax burrowi View in CoL ; Iredale & Hull 1927: 96, pl. 11, figs 13, 31, 32; Leloup 1940: 15, fig. 5, pl. 3, fig. 3 (bibliography and synonymy); Kaas 1979: 877; Kaas et al. 1998: 189; Kaas & Van Belle 1998: 36; Slieker 2000: 54, pl. 15, fig. 11; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46; Schwabe 2005: 54, pl. 2, fig. 12; Burghardt et al. 2006: 30.

Non Cryptoplax burrowi View in CoL ; Haddon 1886: 42, pl. 3, figs 11 a–m; Pilsbry 1893: 54, pl. 9, figs 6–10 (fide Iredale & Hull 1927: 97), referring to a form of Cryptoplax elioti Pilsbry, 1901 View in CoL .

Type: Syntypes NHM 1881.11.1.100 (1 specimen), NHM 1992053 (4 specimens) (fide Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46).

Type locality: Port Molle , Queensland, Australia .

Material examined: M07: 1 spm (length 11.7 mm, curled, Figs 12R–S View FIGURE 12 ); M13: 4 valves (2 intermediate and 2 tail); M20: 2 valves (1 head and 1 intermediate); M65: 3 valves (2 intermediate and 1 tail); MLD02A: 4 valves (1 head and 3 intermediate); MLD03A: 2 valves (1 head and 1 intermediate); LB05: 14 valves (8 head and 6 intermediate); Indonesia ( NW Sulawesi, Bunaken National Park, W Bunaken Id): 1 spm ( ZSM Mol 20033081, leg. E. Schwabe 16/07/2003, length 25.4 mm, Fig. 12T View FIGURE 12 ).

Description: The living specimen ( Figs 12R–S View FIGURE 12 ) is strongly curved. The first four valves are in contact, valve v is near valve iv, and the following valves with spaces in between. It is difficult to measure the distance between the valves, also because valves vii and viii are in the curled extremity, but the distance between valves vi and vii is the widest, and with a greater approximation the distances can be estimated as 1.3 mm between valves v–vi, 2.2 mm between valves vi–vii and 1.5 mm between valves vii–viii. The valves are eroded, without visible sculpture. Perinotum wide and velvety, colour greenish brown with whithish spots. Two types of dorsal scales are present ( Figs 11K–L View FIGURE 11 ), the first more elongate, flat, rounded at the top and sculptured with 9–10 large longitudinal ribs, the second more numerous and shorter, cylindrical and rounded at the top, strongly sculptured with longitudinal striae. The marginal fringe shows cylindrical, straight spicules ( Fig. 11I View FIGURE 11 ), and ventrally there are rectangular flat spicules ( Fig. 11J View FIGURE 11 ), finely longitudinally striated.

The 29 separate valves have a tegmental coloration of reddish-brown to whitish. Head valve horseshoeshaped ( Fig. 11A View FIGURE 11 ), the tegmentum occupying a large amount of the whole valve, the anterior margin is rounded, while the posterior is straight. Valves ii roughly pentagonal in outline. Valves iii–vii narrow, spindleshaped ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ) [as known, in Cryptoplax intermediate valves can differ from each other in layout and dimension ( Pilsbry 1901)]. Tail valve spindle-shaped with the insertion lamina well visible around the tegmentum ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ), mucro terminal.

The sculpture consists of a smooth and parallel-sided jugal area and of 3–5 rows of elongate granules in latero-pleural areas, that aim to become indistinct towards the anterior valve margin. The granules in lateropleural areas show a megalaesthete in a more or less central position, surrounded by numerous micraesthetes, which are irregularly distributed ( Fig. 11H View FIGURE 11 ).

Articulamentum white, strongly developed. Intermediate and tail valves with elongate apophyses, which are connected by a jugal lamina in the tail valve. Slit formula 3/0/0.

Remarks: This species has a complex taxonomic history. It was described by E.A. Smith (1884) on the basis of a single specimen from Port Molle (Queensland, Australia), without illustrations, as a new name (nomen novum) for Chitonellus larvaeformis Reeve, 1847 , not Burrow, 1815. He regarded the figure given by Reeve for his Chitonellus larvaeformis as sufficiently exact to represent his species. The subsequent reports of Haddon (1886: 42, pl. 3, Figs 11a–m View FIGURE 11 ) and Pilsbry (1893: 54, pl. 9, Figs 6–10 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 ) are erroneous, referring instead to a form of Cryptoplax elioti Pilsbry, 1901 (fide Iredale & Hull 1925: 107; 1927: 97). If this interpretation is correct, following Iredale & Hull (1925, 1927), the type material in the NHM should not be of C. burrowi , because when Haddon reported upon the Challenger Polyplacophora he reproduced drawings made by E.A. Smith from specimens in the NHM. Good descriptions of the species were subsequently given by Nierstrasz (1905) and Leloup (1940), who established the synonymy with C. hartmeyeri Thiele, 1911 and C. mjöbergi Bergenhayn, 1933 , a decision which was followed by subsequent authors ( Kaas & Van Belle 1998; Gowlett- Holmes 2001). To our knowledge, no other description of the species was given after Leloup (1940).

We examined and illustrate for comparison the type material of Cryptoplax burrowi present in NHM:

- NHM 1881.11.1.100, syntype, detached valves (“body in alcohol” reported in the label illustrated, Fig. 14C View FIGURE 14 , but not present in the material examined), Coll. Coppinger, Port Molle, Queensland, 12-20 fms. 12 valves are present, 3 head and 9 intermediates, there are not tail valves ( Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 O-R)

- NHM 1992 053, syntypes, 4 spm, H. Cuming colln., Port Adelaide, S. Australia (figured in Reeve, 1847, sp. 3, pl. 1, fig. 3 as C. larvaeformis ), length respectively 56.4 mm ( Fig. 12U View FIGURE 12 ), 47 mm ( Fig. 12W View FIGURE 12 ), 45.1 mm ( Fig. 12X View FIGURE 12 ) and 38.5 mm ( Fig. 12V View FIGURE 12 ).

TEXTFIGURE 1. Cryptoplax burrowi , girdle elements (from Leloup, 1940: figs 5 A i - 5 A iv)

This material does not completely agree with the living specimes from the Maldives Islands, mainly in the girdle colour (yellowish brown, instead of greenish brown in our specimen), and in the different disposition of the valves, the first four in contact, valve v well separated from iv (much more that in our specimen), the distances between valves v – vi and vi – vii are the widest and similar, the distance between the valves vii-viii about the half than between the valves iv – v.

The characters of our material agree with the more extended description given by Leloup (1940, pp. 22- 23), that also presented a table with the main characters of C. burrowi (including the synonyms C. hartmeyeri and C. mjöbergi ) compared with C. elioti and C. dupuisi Ashby, 1931 . We report for completeness fig. 5 of Leloup 1940 (textfig. 1) illustrating the girdle elements.

For comparison a specimen of Cryptoplax burrowi from Indonesia ( Fig. 12T View FIGURE 12 ) was examined. It has a length of 25.4 mm, the first four valves are in contact, the valve v is near the valve iv (but not so close as in specimen from Maldives), and the following valves with spaces in between. In this specimen the distance between valves vi–vii (5 mm) is also the widest, while there are 3.7 mm between valves v–vi, and 2.6 mm between valves vii–viii (always with a large approximation, but more acurate than for the curled Maldive specimen).

The sculpture of the separate valves agrees with the description given by Leloup (1940: 17), and the layout of the valves agrees with the drawings given by Nierstrasz (1905: Fig. 146).

Determination of the specimens from the Maldives Island is very difficult, considering also the very complex taxonomical history of Cryptoplax burrowi , and the doubts regarding the type material present in the NHM. Additional material to study and examination of the type material of the other Cryptoplax species will be necessary, and this is outside the scope of this work. We preliminarily assign the specimens to Cryptoplax burrowi .

Distribution: Cryptoplax burrowi is a species commonly collected in the intertidal, living between and under dead corals and under stones. It is known from Australia (W. Australia, Queensland), Christmas Island, Indonesia (Sulawesi, Lombock, Damar, Banda), Philippines (Sulu Archipelago) and Maldive Islands.

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Polyplacophora

Order

Chitonida

Family

Cryptoplacidae

Genus

Cryptoplax

Loc

Cryptoplax burrowi (E.A. Smith, 1884 )

Dell’Angelo, Bruno, Gori, Sandro, Baschieri, Leonardo & Bonfitto, Antonio 2010
2010
Loc

Cryptoplax burrowi

Burghardt, I. & Carvalho, R. & Eheberg, D. & Gerung, G. & Kaligis, F. & Mamangkey, G. & Schrodl, M. & Schwabe, E. & Vonnemann, V. & Wagele, H. 2006: 30
Schwabe, E. 2005: 54
Gowlett-Holmes, K. 2001: 46
Slieker, F. J. A. 2000: 54
Kaas, P. & Van Belle, R. A. 1998: 36
Kaas, P. 1979: 877
Leloup, E. 1940: 15
Iredale, T. & Hull, A. F. B. 1927: 96
1927
Loc

Chiton (Chitonellus) burrowi E.A. Smith 1884: 85

Smith, E. A. 1884: 85
1884
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF