Tribe
Meliponini Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau
View in CoL
View at ENA
The stingless bees, tribe
Meliponini
, are one of two lineages of exclusively highly eusocial bees in the apine clade Corbiculata ( Michener, 2007;
Engel
& Rasmussen, 2021;
Engel
et al., 2021; Melo, 2021). Like honey bees (
Apini
), meliponines live in typically large, perennial colonies, and are actively managed (meliponiculture) in certain regions of the tropics for the production of honey, pollination services, as well as other materials (e.g., propolis, resin). The 520 modern species are distributed pantropically and are most diverse in those regions where honey bees are not native (i.e., South and Central America), perhaps reflecting a historical competitive pressure between these two eusocial rivals (
Engel
, 2001a). Unlike honey bees, not all stingless bees collect pollen. Species of the Asian genera
Lisotrigona Moure
and
Pariotrigona Moure
are lachryphages (tear-drinking bees), collecting tears from a variety of vertebrates and using this as a source of nutrients ( Bänziger et al., 2009, 2011; Bänziger & Bänziger, 2010; Bänziger, 2018). Although the minute species of
Trigonisca (Leurotrigona) Moure
are known as “lambe olhos” (eye lickers), they are apparently not lachryphagous as in the aforementioned genera. Species of
Lestrimelita Friese
(Neotropical) and
Liotrigona (Cleptotrigona) Moure (Afrotropical)
are robber bees (cleptobiotic) and make mass raids on other meliponine colonies, during which they steal resources to bring back to their home nest ( Portugal-Araújo, 1958; Wille, 1983; Sakagami et al., 1993; Grüter et al., 2016). Species of
Trichotrigona Camargo & Moure
are also robber bees, but these make solitary raids on their hosts (
Engel
& Rasmussen, 2021). Lastly, there is a small clade of vulture bees (necrophages) in the genus
Trigona Jurine
(Necrotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen.: Appendix), species of which harvest tissues from vertebrate carcasses and store these in pots within the nest ( Camargo & Roubik, 1991; Noll et al., 1996; Noll, 1997; Mateus & Noll, 2004).
The tribe is most closely related to the extinct tribe
Melikertini
(
Engel
, 2001a, 2001b; Schult et al., 2001; Cardinal & Packer, 2007), known only from Eocene amber deposits of Europe and Asia. Characteristics of melikertines have recently been summarized in detail (
Engel
& Davis, 2021), and that material is not repeated here. The closest relative of the
Melikertini
+
Meliponini
clade remains somewhat controversial. Many analyses based on diverse data support the highly eusocial
Apini
as sister, along with the concomitant reconstruction of a single origin of highly eusocial behavior among corbiculate bees (e.g., Roig-Alsina & Michener, 1993; Schult et al., 1999, 2001;
Engel
, 2001b; Noll, 2002; Cardinal & Packer, 2007; Canevazzi & Noll, 2015; Porto et al., 2016, 2017, 2021; Porto & Almeida, 2021; Noll et al., in press). Nonetheless, some analyses suggest that meliponines are more closely related to the primitively eusocial bumble bees, with
Apis Linnaeus
clustering with the orchid bees or as sister to
Meliponini
+
Bombini
(e.g., Kawakita et al., 2008; Ramírez et al., 2010; Martins et al., 2014; Romiguier et al., 2016; Kwong et al., 2017; Bossert et al., 2019).
Meliponines are distinguished by a large number of traits relative to other corbiculate bees, and particularly from their relatives in the
Melikertini
and
Apini
. As their cognomen implies, the sting apparatus of stingless bees is vestigial, although the sting stylet itself is still distinct with an acutely sharp apex and therefore sting-like in
Melipona Illiger
,
Liotrigona (Cleptotrigona)
,
Meliplebeia Moure
,
Axestotrigona Moure
,
Meliponula Cockerell
, and somewhat in
Plebeiella Moure. Beyond
the structure of the sting, stingless bees lack extensive outer mandibular grooves (as in
Melikertini
,
Apini
, and those weakened grooves in
Electrapini
), have the anterior mandibular condyle contiguous with the clypeal border (as in
Apini
and
Melikertini
, covered by the clypeal border in
Euglossini
and
Bombini
), have the mentum and submentum separated (as in
Apini
and
Bombini
, rather than fused in
Euglossini
), and the compound eyes usually bare (hirsute in
Apini
). The mesoscutum lacks the supraälar carina that is otherwise present in all other living and fossil corbiculate bees. The wings of stingless bees are noteworthy for the reduction of the distal wing venation, rather than the complete venation of all other corbiculate bees. The distal portion of the wing lacks alar papillae (as is the case in
Apini
and
Melikertini
, while papillae are generally present in
Euglossini
,
Bombini
,
Electrobombini
, and
Electrapini
), and the jugal lobe of the hind is present proximally (as is the case in all corbiculate bees with the exception of
Euglossini
and
Bombini
). The protibial strigilis lacks an anterior velum, as in
Melikertini
, that is otherwise present in all other living and fossil corbiculate bees. The meliponine metatibia has a distinct penicillum at the distal inferior angle [except absent in the cleptobiotic
Lestrimelita
and
Liotrigona (Cleptotrigona)
, and rudimentary in
Trichotrigona
], a unique trait not otherwise known in any other living and fossil corbiculate bees, although there is a patch of setae in
Melikertini
that is situated in the position of the penicillum and that could be a homologous precursor (
Engel
& Davis, 2021). Metatibial spurs are completely absent in
Meliponini
, as well as in
Apini
, while a single spur, sometimes reduced, is present in
Melikertini
and
Electrapini
, and the normal complement and development of spurs are present in
Euglossini
,
Bombini
, and
Electrobombini
. The auricle that is present in all corbiculate bees (except parasitic forms), is characteristically absent in stingless bees. The pretarsal claws are simple (toothed to some degree in all other corbiculate bees), and the arolium is present (as in all living and fossil corbiculate bees with the exception of
Euglossini
and
Bombini
). In males, the hidden metasomal sterna VII and VIII are reduced (as in
Apini
, well-developed in
Euglossini
and
Bombini
), and the gonobase is absent or vestigial (as in
Apini
, present in
Euglossini
and
Bombini
). Although a single melikertine male is known (
Engel
et al., 2014), it has yet to be scanned to see if the terminalia could be visualized and compared with that of
Meliponini
and other corbiculate bees.
The Old World fauna of stingless bees, while diverse, is minor by comparison to the plethora of species found in the New World tropics ( Michener, 2007; Rasmussen, 2008; Rasmussen et al., 2017). Nonetheless, there is considerable variety in the lineages and biology of the Eastern Hemisphere
Meliponini
. This fauna was largely assigned to the otherwise New World genus
Trigona
until Moure (1961) provided a far-reaching, and in some ways prescient, rearrangement of the fauna (in the same fashion as he had for the New World fauna earlier: Moure, 1951), ascribing the numerous species to a series of unique genera and subgenera. While some chose to retain most of Moure’s groups within
Trigona
(e.g., Michener, 1990, 2007), gradually an augmented version of his system has become adopted (e.g., Michener, 2013; Rasmussen et al., 2017;
Engel
et al., 2018;
Engel
, 2019; Grüter, 2020; Melo, 2021; herein) and is followed herein. The classification of the tribe can be outlined as follows ( Table 2) (Appendix):
Subtribe
Hypotrigonina
Engel, new subtribe (type genus:
Hypotrigona Cockerell
View in CoL
): This clade comprises all extant Eastern Hemisphere stingless bees. The group is quite heterogenous and there are repeated convergences with genera of the
Meliponina
, such as the presence of the basal sericeous area on the proximal retrolateral surface of the metabastarsus. Nonetheless, the group includes those species with flatened worker gonostyli bearing gonotrichia (except also present in
Trigoniscitae
, but in those bees the marginal cell base is greatly broadened such that the basal angle is slightly acute to orthogonal), or species with a distinctive pollen pocket proximally on the prolateral surface of the metabasitarsus (those species with the pollen pocket have the worker gonostyli cylindrical and lack gonotrichia). Wille (1979) and Michener (2007) discussed some of these convergences in greater detail. The occurrence of gonotrichia on the worker gonostyli is largely split between the two internal clades of this subtribe, with none present among
Heterotrigonitae
and gonotrichia largely present in
Hypotrigonitae
aside from two exceptions (vide infra). The two major clades of the subtribe are:
Infratribe
Heterotrigonitae
Engel, new infratribe (type genus:
Heterotrigona Schwarz
View in CoL
): The genera of this clade all possess a distinctive apical glabrate (apicoglabrate) zone on the retrolateral surface of the metatibia and have a robust, broad, ovoid metasoma that tapers in width apically from the third segment. The worker gonostyli, where known, are cylindrical and lack gonotrichia. On the prolateral surface of the metabasitarsus there is a proximal superior concavity, inferiorly bordered by a ridge (sometimes the ridge is strong but can vary to exceptionally weak and largely grading onto the otherwise normal planar prolateral surface) that bears a distinctive fimbria of fine, simple, superiorly directed setae (the fimbriate line) that border the otherwise largely glabrous concave surface. Wille (1979) considered this to be a “pollen press” of sorts, but not to be confused with the more typical pollen press formed by the auricle which is present in other corbiculate bee lineages. The function of this structure is unknown but to avoid confusion with the actual pollen press of other bees, we here refer to it as a pollen pocket. A pollen pocket is found in all
Heterotrigonitae
, albeit more weakly so in some of the minute species of
Tetragonula
View in CoL
s.str. In fact, the pollen pocket is generally weaker in
Tetragonula
View in CoL
s.l. than in other
Heterotrigonitae
. A pollen pocket is also present in
Oxytrigona Cockerell
View in CoL
(
Meliponina
:
Meliponitae
). The clade includes seven genera:
Tetragonula Moure
View in CoL
(
Tetragonula
View in CoL
s.str. and
Tetragonilla Moure
View in CoL
),
Homotrigona Moure
View in CoL
(
Homotrigona
View in CoL
s.str.,
Lophotrigona Moure
View in CoL
,
Odontotrigona Moure
View in CoL
, and
Tetrigona Moure
View in CoL
),
Geniotrigona Moure
View in CoL
,
Heterotrigona Schwarz
View in CoL
(
Heterotrigona
View in CoL
s.str.,
Sundatrigona Inoue & Sakagami
View in CoL
,
Borneotrigona
Engel,
Platytrigona Moure
View in CoL
, Sahulotrigona Engel & Rasmussen),
Papuatrigona Michener & Sakagami
View in CoL
,
Lepidotrigona Schwarz
View in CoL
, and
Wallacetrigona
View in CoL
Engel & Rasmussen.
Tribe
MELIPONINI Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau
Subtribe
Meliponina Lepeletier
[New World] Subtribe
Hypotrigonina
Engel, n. subtrib. [Old World]
Infratribe
Trigoniscitae
Engel, n. infratrib. Infratribe
Heterotrigonitae
Engel, n. infratrib.
Trigonisca
Genus Group Clan
Heterotrigona
Genus
Trigonisca Moure
Heterotrigona
Genus Group Subgenus
Leurotrigona Moure
Genus
Geniotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Exochotrigona
Engel Genus
Heterotrigona Schwarz
Subgenus
Celetrigona Moure
Subgenus
Borneotrigona
Engel Subgenus
Trigonisca Moure
, s.str. Subgenus
Sundatrigona Inoue & Sakagami
Genus †
Exebotrigona
Engel & Michener Subgenus
Heterotrigona Schwarz
, s.str.
Infratribe
Meliponitae Lepeletier
Subgenus
Platytrigona Moure
Clan
Trigona
Subgenus
Sahulotrigona
Engel & Rasmussen
Paratrigona
Genus Group Genus
Papuatrigona Michener & Sakagami
Genus
Paratrigona Schwarz
Genus
Lepidotrigona Schwarz
Subgenus
Aparatrigona Moure
Genus
Wallacetrigona
Engel & Rasmussen Subgenus
Paratrigona Schwarz
, s.str.
Homotrigona
Genus Group Genus
Paratrigonoides Camargo & Roubik
Genus
Homotrigona Moure
Genus
Nogueirapis Moure
Subgenus
Lophotrigona Moure
Genus
Partamona Schwarz
Subgenus
Homotrigona Moure
, s.str. Subgenus
Partamona Schwarz
, s.str. Subgenus
Odontotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Parapartamona Schwarz
Subgenus
Tetrigona Moure
Trigona
Genus Group Clan
Tetragonula
Genus
Oxytrigona Cockerell
Genus
Tetragonula Moure
Genus
Scaptotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Tetragonilla Moure
Genus
Geotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Tetragonula Moure
, s.str. Genus
Ptilotrigona Moure
Infratribe
Hypotrigonitae
Engel, n. infratrib. Genus
Tetragona Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville
Hypotrigona
Genus Group Subgenus
Camargoia Moure
Genus
Hypotrigona Cockerell
Subgenus
Tetragona
s.str. Genus
Liotrigona Moure
Genus
Trigona Jurine
Subgenus
Cleptotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Aphaneuropsis
Engel
, n. subgen. Subgenus
Liotrigona Moure
, s.str. Subgenus
Koilotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus
Pariotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Necrotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus
Lisotrigona Moure
Subgenus
Nostotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus
Austroplebeia Moure
Subgenus
Ktinotrofia
Engel
, n. subgen. Subgenus †
Anteplebeina
Engel
, n. subgen. Subgenus
Aphaneura Gray
Subgenus
Austroplebeia Moure
, s.str. Subgenus
Trigona Jurine
, s.str. Genus †
Kelneriapis Sakagami
Subgenus
Dichrotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus †
Liotrigonopsis
Engel Genus
Cephalotrigona Schwarz
Meliponula
Genus Group Genus
Meliwillea Roubik, Segura, & Camargo
Genus
Meliplebeia Moure
Plebeia
Genus Group Subgenus
Apotrigona Moure
Genus
Tetragonisca Moure
Subgenus
Meliplebeia Moure
, s.str. Genus
Frieseomelita Ihering
Genus
Axestotrigona Moure
Genus
Trichotrigona Camargo & Moure
Subgenus
Atrichotrigona
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus
Duckeola Moure
Subgenus
Axestotrigona Moure
, s.str. Genus
Plectoplebeia Melo
Genus
Plebeiella Moure
Genus
Plebeia Schwarz
Genus
Dactylurina Cockerell
Subgenus
Nanoplebeia
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus
Meliponula Cockerell
Subgenus
Plebeia Schwarz
, s.str. Genus
Plebeina Moure
Genus
Lestrimelita Friese
Genus
Friesella Moure
Genus
Asperplebeia
Engel, n. gen. Subtribe
Incertae
sedis Genus
Nannotrigona Cockerell
Genus †
Cretotrigona
Engel [
Meliponina
?] Subgenus
Lispotrigona Gonzalez
&
Engel
, n. subgen. Genus †
Meliponorytes Tosi
[Heterotrigonina?] Subgenus
Nannotrigona Cockerell
, s.str. Genus
Schwarziana Moure
Subgenus
Mourella Schwarz
Subgenus
Chapadapis
Engel
, n. subgen. Subgenus
Schwarziana Moure
, s.str. Genus
Scaura Schwarz
Subgenus
Scaura Schwarz
, s.str. Subgenus
Schwarzula Moure
Genus †
Proplebeia Michener
Clan
Melipona
Genus
Melipona Illiger
Subgenus
Melipona Illiger
, s.str. Subgenus
Meliponotes
Engel Subgenus
Melikerria Moure
Subgenus
Eomelipona Moure
Subgenus
Mouremelia
Engel Subgenus
Michmelia Moure
Infratribe
Hypotrigonitae
Engel, new infratribe (type genus: autobasic with Hypotrigonina Engel, vide supra): The genera of this clade all lack a broad apical glabrate zone on the retrolateral surface of the metatibia, with the exception of
Dactylurina Cockerell
View in CoL
, which, while having such a glabrate zone, combines it with an elongate, subclavate, finger-like metasoma, not found in the
Heterotrigonitae
. The worker gonostyli, where known, are flatened and have gonotrichia, with the exception of the minute species of
Hypotrigona Cockerell
View in CoL
and
Pariotrigona
View in CoL
, which have the gonostyli greatly reduced and almost tuberculiform. The pollen pocket of the
Heterotrigonitae
is lacking, with the proximal superior surface where it would otherwise be found largely coplanar with the remainder of the metabasitarsal prolateral surface (sometimes there is a faint slope leading to the retrodorsal margin) and the setae are largely uniform across the surface (i.e., not defining a line bordering a polished superior surface), although often subappressed and superiorly directed. This clade includes 11 extant genera:
Lisotrigona
View in CoL
,
Pariotrigona
View in CoL
, and
Austroplebeia Moure
View in CoL
in the Indomalayan and Papuan and Australian regions, respectively; and the African
Hypotrigona
View in CoL
,
Liotrigona Moure
View in CoL
(
Liotrigona
View in CoL
s.str. and
Cleptotrigona
),
Plebeina Moure
View in CoL
,
Meliponula
View in CoL
,
Dactylurina
View in CoL
,
Plebeiella
View in CoL
,
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
[Atrichotrigona
Engel
, new subgenus (Appendix), and
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
s.str.], and
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
(
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. and
Apotrigona Moure
) [Note: contra Michener (2007), one of us (M.S.E.) considers
Meliponula
View in CoL
,
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
, and
Plebeiella
View in CoL
to be distinct genera (Appendix), and that
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
here constitutes those species with yellow markings, a sloping basal area distinct from the vertical posterior surface, and the propodeal basal area covered with fine erect setae. The subgenera are then distinguished by the mesoscutum tessellate in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. versus punctate in
Apotrigona
, the mandible with small teeth in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. versus pronounced and strong in
Apotrigona
, the scape as long as the torulocellar distance in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. versus shorter in
Apotrigona
, the basal vein (1M) slightly distad 1cu-a in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. versus slightly basad in
Apotrigona
; the superior parapenicillum is well developed in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. and poorly developed, scarcely definable as a parapenicillum, in
Apotrigona
;
Apotrigona
also has a faint opalescence observable under certain lightings that is seemingly not present in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
s.str. The superior parapenicillum is only present in
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
,
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
,
Plebeiella
View in CoL
, and
Meliponula
View in CoL
.]. Although
Dactylurina
View in CoL
has been placed as sister to
Meliponula ( Rasmussen & Cameron, 2010)
View in CoL
, most morphological characters suggest it should be in a more basal position along with or just basal to
Plebeina
View in CoL
(e.g., absence of superior parapenicillum), with
Meliponula
View in CoL
more closely related to
Plebeiella
View in CoL
,
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
, and
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
. A possible set of relationships that should be more fully explored would be:
Dactylurina
View in CoL
(
Plebeina
View in CoL
(
Meliponula
View in CoL
(
Plebeiella
View in CoL
(
Axestotrigona
View in CoL
+
Meliplebeia
View in CoL
)))). Under such an arrangement, the superior parapenicillum and the more developed sting would unite everything from
Meliponula
View in CoL
onward (and those groups could potentially all be classified as subgenera of
Meliponula
View in CoL
once again, analogous to but not equivalent to the system of Wille, 1979, and Michener, 2007). The fossil genera
Kelneriapis Sakagami
and
Liotrigonopsis
Engel, both in Eocene Baltic amber, belong to this clade.
Subtribe
Meliponina Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau
(type genus:
Melipona Illiger
View in CoL
): The subtribe is characterized by the absence of features otherwise distinctive for the
Hypotrigonina
. The worker gonostyli of the subtribe lack gonotrichia in all genera except those of the basal
Trigoniscitae
(likely a plesiomorphic feature for that subtribe, shared symplesiomorphically with the
Hypotrigonitae
, and then independently lost in
Meliponitae
,
Heterotrigonitae
,
Hypotrigona
View in CoL
, and
Pariotrigona
View in CoL
; such loss is clearly not linked to minute body sizes as the minute species of
Trigoniscitae
,
Liotrigona
View in CoL
s.l.,
Lisotrigona
View in CoL
, and
Austroplebeia
View in CoL
all retain such gonotrichia). The subtribe is exclusively distributed in the Western Hemisphere, from Mexico to northern Argentina, although
Plebeia (Plebeia) frontalis (Friese)
View in CoL
has been introduced into coastal central California (M. Hauser, pers. comm.; M.S.E., per. obs.).
Infratribe
Trigoniscitae
Engel, new infratribe (type genus:
Trigonisca Moure
): This group was characterized recently (as the “
Trigonisca
Genus Group”) by
Engel
et al. (2019). The included species are united by the distinctively broadened base to the marginal cell in which the basal angle is slightly acute to orthogonal (68°–90°), and with the marginal cell, at the apex of the pterostigma, broader than the area encompassed by the submarginal cells. The forewing is less, usually much less, than 4 mm in length. The work- er gonostyli have a field of gonotrichia (otherwise known only in most African and two Indomalayan-Australasian genera). Additionally, the retromarginal edge of the metatibia is typically nodulose to tuberculate, sometimes weakly so, with the exception of the fossil genus
Exebotrigona
Engel & Michener. The clade includes the extant genus
Trigonisca Moure
(
Trigonisca
s.str.,
Leurotrigona Moure
, Exochotrigona Engel, and
Celetrigona Moure
). The fossil genus
Exebotrigona
, in Baltic amber, belongs to this clade as evidenced by the form of the marginal cell and small body size. Modern species of the infratribe occur from southern Mexico to southern Peru, Bolivia, and the southern reaches of the Central-West and Southeast Regions of Brazil.
Infratribe
Meliponitae Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau
(= Trigonini Moure, Lestrimelitini Moure): This group differs from
Trigoniscitae
by the distinctly acute base to the marginal cell, with it’s breadth at the apex of the pterostigma litle if any broader than the area encompassed by the submarginal cells. The forewing is usually over 4 mm in length. The worker gonostyli lack gonotrichia. The retromarginal edge of the metatibia is not nodulose or tuberculate. The clade includes all remaining extant genera of
Meliponini
[ Table 2: subgeneric system of
Melipona
from
Engel
(in pressb)]. The Miocene genus
Proplebeia Michener
, in Dominican and Mexican amber, belongs to the
Plebeia
-group of this infratribe.
The fossil genera
Meliponorytes Tosi
and
Cretotrigona
Engel are currently considered incertae sedis, pending further study.
Meliponorytes
is a poorly understood genus of putatively two species in Sicilian amber, but has not been studied since the Bolognese archeologist Alessandro Tosi (1865–1949) described and figured the group in 1896. The material was in the Collezione di Mineralogia (Museo di Mineralogia), Universitá di Bologna but the current state of preservation relative to oxidation (Sicilian amber can turn quite black), crazing, and deterioration is unknown. The species are minute and have various features typical of minute
Meliponini
(e.g., Michener, 2002), but other peculiar traits illustrated by Tosi (1896) require confirmation, although
Meliponorytes
appears to be similar to some African forms and is likely of the
Hypotrigonina
:
Hypotrigonitae
. The genus
Cretotrigona
, a stingless bee from the latest Cretaceous of eastern North America, is currently the oldest occurrence of eusocial bees and the earliest definitive crown-group bee ( Michener & Grimaldi, 1988;
Engel
, 2000). Its placement among
Meliponini
is uncertain and so the genus is considered as unplaced among the subtribes. Other fossil meliponines have been recovered from Eocene amber of the Baltic region, and the Miocene of China, Ethiopia (M.S.E., unpubl. data), Mexico, and the Dominican Republic ( Table 1).
As alluded to in the Introduction, stingless bees are not uncommon in the fossil record, and although the number of fossil species is not great, the abundance of individuals can be prodigious for certain taxa ( Camargo et al., 2000;
Engel
& Michener, 2013a). The same is true for meliponines in the Miocene deposits of Zhangpu. The stingless bees in Zhangpu amber represent both the
Heterotrigonitae
(
Tetragonula
) and
Hypotrigonitae
(
Austroplebeia
).