Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), 1936

Martin, Jon H., 2005, Whiteflies of Belize (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Part 2 - a review of the subfamily Aleyrodinae Westwood, Zootaxa 1098 (1), pp. 1-116 : 36-37

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1098.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4B00F-FFE2-C505-FECA-9BECFC0755DC

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)
status

 

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) View in CoL

( Figs 25–27 View FIGURES 25–28 )

Aleurodes tabaci Gennadius, 1889: 1–3 View in CoL . Lectotype, Greece (designated by Martin, 1999: 59–60).

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) Takahashi, 1936: 110 View in CoL .

Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring View in CoL , in Bellows et al., 1994: 196. Holotype, California. [Synonymised by De Barro et al., 2005: 201.]

DISTRIBUTION. Cosmopolitan in all warmer parts of the world.

COMMENTS. B. tabaci , variously known under the common names tobacco, cotton or sweet potato whitefly, is much the most investigated of whitefly species because of the many problems it causes in worldwide agriculture. Cock (1986) published a survey of the literature on B. tabaci , with 829 entries, and an update followed ( Cock, 1993). Many other communications have been published subsequently, most commonly on molecular investigations (see below) and on aspects of plant virus transmission.

B. tabaci View in CoL has been regarded as a morphologically variable single species, with an exceptionally wide range of host plants, following the demonstration of the phenomenon of puparial plasticity ( Figs 25–27 View FIGURES 25–28 ) by Mound (1963). However, more recent investigations have shown many field­collected populations (“biotypes”) to have small host plant ranges, with some behaving as though monophagous. Indeed, Mound had found the transfer of populations from one host to another to be a great obstacle during his experimental work on host­induced morphological variation. Several such population biotypes have been recognised for some years, but the development of new techniques for the study of cytology and molecular sequencing has led to many more being recognised. A situation of great complexity, controversy and nomenclatural confusion has now arisen, and this was compounded when “biotype B” was eventually given its own species name, B. argentifolii Bellows & Perring View in CoL (in Bellows et al, 1994), and its own common name, “silverleaf whitefly” (from the visible feeding damage caused to squash plants). However, the other recognised biotypes were not treated in this way, with many workers agreeing that the naming of B. argentifolii View in CoL was premature. De Barro et al. (2005) have declared B. argentifolii View in CoL to be a race of B. tabaci View in CoL and, thus, its junior synonym but much controversy remains.

The characters for distinguishing B. tabaci View in CoL sensu lato from the B. afer View in CoL / B. centroamericana View in CoL ­group are discussed under B. centroamericana View in CoL , above.

Throughout this study, only a single sample of B. tabaci was discovered, feeding on a small euphorbiaceous herb, by the side of the CFR access road.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Aleyrodidae

Genus

Bemisia

Loc

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)

Martin, Jon H. 2005
2005
Loc

Bemisia argentifolii

De Barro, P. J. & Trueman, J. W. H. & Frohlich, D. R. 2005: 201
Bellows, T. S. Jr & Perring, T. M. & Gill, R. J. & Headrick, D. H. 1994: 196
1994
Loc

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)

Takahashi, R. 1936: 110
1936
Loc

Aleurodes tabaci

Martin, J. H. 1999: 59
Gennadius, P. 1889: 3
1889
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF