Podoscirtina Saussure, 1878
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.31610/zsr/2021.30.1.64 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7FFF260C-0C62-45CF-961D-19B242F3CBC7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8117162 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D3878B-FFC4-FFBD-729B-84082E20FC27 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Podoscirtina Saussure, 1878 |
status |
|
Subtribe Podoscirtina Saussure, 1878 View in CoL
Type genus: Podoscirtus Audinet-Serville, 1839 View in CoL ; Madagascar.
Diagnosis. General appearance ( Figs 1–13 View Figs 1–9 View Figs 10–17 ) rather diverse but typical of Podoscirtini ; all tympana (if developed) open and oval. Male genitalia primitive in structure ( Figs 18–20, 23–25 View Figs 18–28 ): epiphallus large, usually with a pair of posterior lobes diverse in size and shape (sometimes epiphallic apex with additional lobules; Figs 14–16 View Figs 10–17 , 26–28 View Figs 18–28 ); ectoparameres ( Figs 18–20, 23–25 View Figs 18–28 ) sclerotised, movable, long or moderately long, rather thin (stick- or spine-shaped), with acute or hooklike apices (but sometimes ectoparameres possibly lost; Figs 14–16 View Figs 10–17 , 26–28 View Figs 18–28 ); endoparameral apodemes usually large, elongate, connected with both ectoparameres and rachis; rachis also large, elongate or slightly elongate, partly membranous, movable in relation to epiphallus, diverse in shape and structure; formula and rami normally developed (but possibly sometimes strongly reduced), rather diverse in size and shape; formula anteriorly often with narrow median apodeme or apodeme-like projection and posteriorly sometimes fused or articulated with sclerotised parts of rachis.
Remarks. The epiphallus in this subtribe usually possesses one characteristic small or tiny denticle near each apex of posterior epiphallic lobes (or near each apex of their upper lobules). Possibly, this denticle is a synapomorphy for members of the Podoscirtina ( Figs 20 and 25 View Figs 18–28 ). In some genera of this subtribe, such a denticle is always or sometimes indistinct (possibly reduced or lost; Figs 14 View Figs 10–17 and 28 View Figs 18–28 ).
Generic composition. Type genus; Kilimagryllus Sjöstedt, 1909 ; Atruljalia Gorochov, 1988 ; Eupodoscirtus Gorochov, 2004 ; Malgasotrella Gorochov, 2004 ; Spinotrella Gorochov, 2004 ; Ultratrella Gorochov, 2004 ; Zvenellomorpha Gorochov, 2004 ; Neozvenella Gorochov, 2004 ; Brevitrella Gorochov, 2004 , stat. nov.; Stenotrella Gorochov, 2005 ; Ombrotrella Gorochov, 2006 ; Allotrella Gorochov, 2006 ; possibly also the following genera: Parametrypa Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1873 , Paranaudus Saussure, 1878 , Paraphasius Chopard, 1927 and Malawitrella gen. nov.
Podoscirtus , Atruljalia , Eupodoscirtus , Malgasotrella , Spinotrella , Ultratrella , Zvenellomorpha , Neozvenella , Stenotrella , Ombrotrella and Allotrella are known only from Madagascar. The others are African genera, but one species of Brevitrella is known from Madagascar, and Paranaudus includes only P. terebrans (Saussure, 1878) from Zanzibar and P.? micropterus Chopard, 1925 from Madagascar ( Chopard, 1952). However, the generic position of the latter taxon is doubtful ( Gorochov, 2005: 201). Parametrypa viettei Chopard, 1958 from Sao Tome Island in Gulf of Guinea was listed in Parametrypa by Cigliano et al. (2021), but actually it does not belong to this genus as well as to the Podoscirtini . This species belongs to the American tribe Paroecanthini Gorochov, 1986 , judging by the photographs of ovipositor of the holotype of P. viettei (Specimen MNHN-EO-ENSIF6593, 2021). The occurrence of some forest Neotropical genera in West Africa and on the nearest islands is well known (for example, Paragryllus Saussure, 1877 from the subfamily Phalangopsinae Blanchard, 1845 ). The genus Fryerius Uvarov, 1940 from Madagascar, the Seychelles and the Comores was placed in the “ Podoscirtus ” generic group ( Gorochov, 2004), but here it is not included in the subtribe Podoscirtina , because its inner tympanum is slit-like or almost slit-like, and the male genitalia lack a characteristic small denticle on the epiphallic apical part near each of its upper apices.
Comparison. The subtribe differs from the other taxa of Podoscirtini in the above-mentioned primitive characters of its tympana and male genitalia, and in one possible synapomorphy: the presence of characteristic epiphallic denticles in most of its representatives (see above).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.