Scatophila adamsi Cresson
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5487.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:50AC1672-FC20-4502-8D8A-4BCAE95F719B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13287144 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187B7-3A4F-7B4C-FF4E-FADF541FFCEF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scatophila adamsi Cresson |
status |
|
5. Scatophila adamsi Cresson View in CoL
Figs. 32. 38–45 View FIGURES 31–33 View FIGURES 34–36 View FIGURE 37 View FIGURES 38–41 View FIGURES 42–44 View FIGURES 45–47 , 48 View FIGURE 48
Scatophila adamsi Cresson 1935: 369 View in CoL .— Sturtevant and Wheeler 1954: 186–187 [review].— Deonier 1964: 110 [key; Iowa]; 1965: 498 [natural history].— Wirth 1965: 758 [ Nearctic catalog].— Zatwarnicki 1987: 291 [checklist].— Zatwarnicki and Mathis 1994: 362 [phylogeny, mesogramma View in CoL group].— Mathis and Zatwarnicki 1995: 281 [world catalog].
Diagnosis.—This species is distinguished from congeners, especially S. ordinaria , by the following combination of characters: Body with tan to brown and usually with some lighter markings, scutellar disc with partially to mostly dark but often with basal and sometimes with apical areas gray; minute shore flies, body length 1.55–1.90 mm.
Head ( Figs. 38–41 View FIGURES 38–41 ): Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta not so far forward, distance between lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta and medial vertical seta only slightly longer than between inner and lateral vertical setae. Lower facial seta not oriented laterally or slightly curved dorsally; ventral margin of face of ♂ distinctly emarginate, bearing laterally a cluster of long setulae and setae on each side. Genal height less than height of basal flagellomere; gena-to-eye ratio 0.23–0.26.
Thorax ( Figs. 32 View FIGURES 31–33 , 45 View FIGURES 45–47 ): Mesonotum ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–47 ) mostly gray with some brownish stripes; acrostichal setae small and of uniform size, arranged in 2 regular rows; dorsocentral setae 2, anterior seta sutural or just postsutural. Wing ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31–33 ) moderately dark with evident pattern or pale spots; cell r 1 lacking white spots; large, quadrate white spot of cell r 3 lacking a dark center; costal vein ratio 0.24–0.27; M 1 vein ratio 0.63–0.65. Midfemur of ♂ lacking row of spine-like setae; tarsi yellowish.
Abdomen ( Figs. 42–44 View FIGURES 42–44 ): Tergites brown to black, rather heavily microtomentose, rarely subshiny. Male terminalia ( Figs. 42–44 View FIGURES 42–44 ): Epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 42–44 ) generally oval except for truncate and conspicuously narrowed ventral margin, epandrial width nearly 0.75 height, lateral margins evenly and shallowly curved, width of ventral margin about equal to width of cercal opening; dorsal epandrial margin in posterior view ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 42–44 ) broadly rounded; epandrial setae about equal in length, sparser medially, more abundant along ventral margin; height of cercal opening about 1/3 epandrial height; cerci in posterior view ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 42–44 ) broadly lunate; aedeagus in lateral view ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 42–44 ) broadly rounded basally, becoming narrower posteriorly, posterior apex shallowly and angularly rounded, dorsal margin strongly excavated, cavity twice as long as wide, in ventral view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 42–44 ) oval; ventral aedeagal process sinuous; phallapodeme in lateral view ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 42–44 ) elongate, shallowly arcuate to shallowly elbowed, dorsal portion (toward base of aedeagus) wider, with 2 shallow, rounded bumps, ventral portion more parallel sided, then tapered to point, in ventral view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 42–44 ) T-shaped, width of basal crossbar about half length of medial process; postgonite in lateral view ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 42–44 ) V-shaped, with dorsal, wider extension somewhat rectangular, bearing setulae, ventral extension elongate, shallowly sinuous, narrow, slightly tapered, in ventral view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 42–44 ) with posterior extensions narrowly clavate; neohypandrium in lateral view ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 42–44 ) narrowly elongated, mostly linear, very shallowly undulated, becoming slightly wider posteriorly.
Type Material.— The holotype male of Scatophila adamsi Cresson is labeled “[ United States.] Atherton, M [iss]o[uri]./ June / TYPE No. 6521[,] Scatophila ADAMSI E.T.Cresson,Jr. [pink; species name and number handwritten]. The holotype is double mounted (minute nadel in rectangular card block), is in fair condition, and is deposited in the ANSP (6521).
Other Specimens Examined.— MEXICO. BAJA CALIFORNIA. Sierra San Pedro Mártir (31°02.7'N, 115°28'W), 7 Mar 1963 GoogleMaps , P. H. Arnaud, Jr. (1♂; USNM) .
UNITED STATES. ARKANSAS. Garland: Hot Springs (24 km W; 34°29.8'N, 93°04'W), 14–19 May 1979 GoogleMaps , K. A. Spencer, G. C. Steyskal (1♂, 1♀; USNM) .
IOWA. Boone: Fraser (1.2 km SW; 42°07.7'N, 93°59'W), 4 Jul 1960, D. L. Deonier (1♂; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Fraser Dam (42°07.5'N, 93°58.4'W), 4 Jul 1960, D. L. Deonier (1♂; USNM) GoogleMaps . Warren: Banner Mine area (41°26.4'N, 93°33.8'W), 7 Aug 1960, D. L. Deonier (1♂; USNM) GoogleMaps .
KANSAS. Riley: Manhattan (39°11'N, 96°34.3'W), 8 Jun 1932, C. W. Sabrosky (1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps .
MARYLAND. Calvert: Chesapeake Beach (38°41.2'N, 76°32.1'W), 5 Jul 1924, J. R GoogleMaps . Malloch (1♀; USNM) .
NEBRASKA. Antelope: Oakdale (42°04.1'N, 97°58'W), 21 Aug 1950 (1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps .
TEXAS. Travis: Austin (30°16'N, 97°44.6'W), 16 Apr–19 Nov 1953, 1959, M. R GoogleMaps . Wheeler (2♂; USNM); Austin (40 km N; 31°N, 97°44.6'W), 22 Sep 1951 (2♂, 1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps .
Type Locality.— United States. Missouri. Jackson: Atherton (39°11.2'N, 94°18.3'W) GoogleMaps .
Distribution ( Fig. 48 View FIGURE 48 ).— Nearctic : Mexico (Baja California). United States (Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Texas).
Natural History.— Deonier (1965) reported this species from mud shores, freshet seeps, and spoil banks Specimen were rare in these habitats.
Remarks.—This species is placed in the mesogramma group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Scatellini |
Genus |
Scatophila adamsi Cresson
Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz & Mathis, Wayne N. 2024 |
mesogramma
Mathis, W. N. & Zatwarnicki, T. 1995: 281 |
Zatwarnicki, T. & Mathis, W. N. 1994: 362 |
Nearctic
Zatwarnicki, T. 1987: 291 |
Wirth, W. W. 1965: 758 |
Scatophila adamsi
Deonier, D. L. 1964: 110 |
Sturtevant, A. H. & Wheeler, M. R. 1954: 186 |
Cresson, E. T., Jr. 1935: 369 |