Onega

Takiya, Daniela Maeda & Cavichioli, Rodney Ramiro, 2004, A review of the Neotropical sharpshooter genus Onega Distant, 1908 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini), Zootaxa 718, pp. 1-19 : 6-7

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.158154

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5697198

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF87FA-FF81-FFE3-AF1E-FEF1FAC478CD

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Onega
status

 

Key to species of Onega View in CoL

1) Forewings without supernumerary crossveins ............................................................. 2

1’) Forewings with supernumerary crossveins on corium and clavus ............................... 3

2) Crown­frons transition with carina only on median portion, not continuous with carina on antennal ledges; forewings light brown maculate with translucent white ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 D); male pygofer with posterior margin forming a lobe bearing short stout macrosetae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A); subgenital plates much shorter than pygofer ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A); aedeagus with single apical process ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 D); female unknown...................................... O. freytagi View in CoL sp. nov.

2’) Crown­frons transition with carina complete, continuous with carina on antennal ledges; forewings translucent yellow with few small lighter yellow spots at base ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B); male pygofer without setigerous lobe ( Young 1977: Fig. 232c); subgenital plates extending posteriorly beyond pygofer apex ( Young 1977: Fig. 232c); aedeagus with pair of apical processes ( Young 1977: Figs 232f, p); female sternite VII with very elongate lateral margins ( Cavichioli & Wyler 1992: Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ).......... O. bracteata Young View in CoL

3) Forewings mostly dark with large unpigmented oblique area on basal half of clavus (usually covered with brochosomes) ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 F, G) ...................................................... 4

3’) Forewings variably colored, but without large unpigmented area on basal half of clavus ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 A, C, E, H) .................................................................................................. 5

4) Females smaller, 12.3–13.3 mm; forewings dark brown to black ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 F); male pygofer with apical margin serrate ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A); aedeagus with dorsal robust elongate process extending from base posteriorly beyond apex of shaft ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D); female sternite VII with posterior margin broadly round and without median projection ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G); female pygofer with macrosetae along most of posteroventral margin ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 I) ........... .......................................................................................................... O. orphne View in CoL sp. nov.

4’) Females larger, approximately 14.9 mm; forewings dark red ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G); male unknown; female sternite VII with small median projection on posterior margin ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A); female pygofer with few macrosetae restricted to dorsal anteapical region ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C) ... ............................................................................................... O. sanguinicollis View in CoL Latreille

5) Forewings with costal margin bordered with red and clavus never red ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C, E); males with paraphysis present as median sclerite ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D, Young 1977: Fig. 233f); female sternite VII abruptly narrowed on apical portion ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E, Young 1977: Fig. 233i) ....................................................................................................................................... 6

5’) Forewings with costal margin usually not bordered with red ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 A, H), if costal margin is red then clavus is red; males without paraphysis ( Young 1977: Figs 234f, 235f, 236f); female sternite not abruptly narrowed distally (female of O. stella View in CoL unknown) ( Young 1977: Figs 234i, 235i) .................................................................... 7

6) Forewings with small translucent white speckles ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 F); male pygofer with apex broadly round ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A); aedeagus without dorsal elongate process ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D) ............. .......................................................................................................... O. krameri View in CoL sp. nov.

6’) Forewings without speckles ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C); male pygofer with apex modified into a narrow

lobe extending posterodorsally ( Young 1977: Fig. 233c); aedeagus with dorsal elongate process arising near base, extending posteriorly almost to apex of median ventral process ( Young 1977: Fig. 233f)........................................................... O. fassli Young View in CoL 7) Male pygofer produced apically into an acute process ( Young 1977: Figs 235c, p, 236c); styles with apex broadened and foot­shaped ( Young 1977: Figs 235e, 236e)... 8

7’) Male pygofer with apex broadly round ( Young 1977: Fig. 234c); styles with apex round, not foot­shaped ( Young 1977: Fig. 234e) ............................. O. stipata (Walker) View in CoL

8) Forewings with broad black subcostal stripe extending from near base to just beyond middle ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A); claval crossveins limited posteriorly and laterally by outer claval vein .............................................................................................................. O. avella View in CoL Distant

8’) Forewings without black subcostal stripe; claval crossveins occurring more extensively ............................................................................................................... O. stella View in CoL Distant

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

Tribe

Cicadellini

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF