Macronotops fulvopilosus ( Fairmaire, 1894 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4556.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C55D5CB-5A0F-4DCE-A5A7-755339CF45F3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5934009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA3425-FF84-A431-C2E9-FDE9177F15CC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macronotops fulvopilosus ( Fairmaire, 1894 ) |
status |
|
Macronotops fulvopilosus ( Fairmaire, 1894) View in CoL
( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 1–23 , 29–30 View FIGURES 24–47 , 53–54 View FIGURES 48–65 , 80–83 View FIGURES 72–98 , 114 View FIGURES 111–122 , 126 View FIGURES 122–134 , 145–150 View FIGURES 145–150 , 209–210 View FIGURES 203–214 , 227–229 View FIGURES 227–234 , 258, 260 View FIGURES 258–260 , 263–265 View FIGURES 261–268 , 298–300 View FIGURES 295–309 )
Taeniodera fulvopilosa Fairmaire, 1894: 219 View in CoL (type locality: Vallée du Tong-Hô, Thibet [=Valley of River Daduhe, near Leshan
County, W. Sichuan, China])*; Schoch 1896: 36. Macronota fulvopilosa (Fairmaire) : Schenkling 1921: 138; Winkler 1929: 1119; Mao 1937: 1084. Pleuronota fulvopilosa (Fairmaire) : Mikšić 1976: 174. Macronotops fulvopilosa (Fairmaire) : Krikken 1977: 207; Krajčík 1998: 90; Smetana 2006: 307; Krajčík 2011: 58; Krajčík
2012: 151. Macronotops fulvopilosus (Fairmaire) : Bezděk 2016: 403.
Type material. Syntype (♂, MNHN, Figs. 228–230 View FIGURES 227–234 ) is labeled: Vallée du Tong-Hô, Chasseurs indigenes, 15 Avril-15 Mai 1893 [pale yellow label] // Taeniodera fulvopilosa n. sp. [pale yellow label] // L. Fairmaire vidit 1893 [pale yellow label] // MUSÉUM PARIS, 1952, COLL. R. OBERTHUR [white label] // TYPE [red label] // Macronotops fulvopilosa (FAIRMAIRE) , J. Ph. Legrand det. VII-2009 [white label] // HOLOTYPE [red label] // MNHN, CE1746 [white label].
Additional material examined (24♂♂, 17♀♀). CHINA: Sichuan : 1♀ ( MNHN), Su-Tchuen, Chasseurs indigenes, 1903 ; 1♀ ( SWU), VIII.1983 , Wolong Nature Reserve, Mujiangping , Wenchuan County, DU & LI .; 1♂ ( QCCC), 2.VIII.2004 , Labahe Nature Reserve , Tianquan County, Yaan, Mao-Lin ZHU ; 1♀ ( QCCC), 6.VIII.2004 , Wolong Nature Reserve , Wenchuan County, Mao-Lin ZHU ; 1♂ ( QCCC) , Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve, Baoxing County, Yaan , 1,820 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU, 3 nd instar in rotten wood 2.X.2014 , adult emerged V.2015; 9♂♂, 1♀ ( QCCC) , Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve, Baoxing County, Yaan , 1,820 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU, 3 nd instar in rotten wood 4.X.2015 , adult emerged V.2016; 8♂♂, 7♀♀ ( QCCC) , Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve, Baoxing County, Yaan , 1,820 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU, 3 nd instar in rotten wood 21.II.2017 , adult emerged V.2017; 3♂♂, 2♀♀ ( QCCC) , Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve, Baoxing County, Yaan , 1,820 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU, 3 nd instar in rotten wood 1. I.2018, adult emerged V.2018; 1♀ ( QCCC), 7.VIII.2014 , Mount Emeishan, Xixinsuo, Leshan , 1,300 m, De-Yao ZHOU ; 2♂♂ ( QCCC), 20. VI.2016 , Longcanggou Forest Park, Yingjing County, Yaan , 1,600 m, adult in pupa cell, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU ; 3♀♀ ( QCCC) , Longcanggou Forest Park, Yingjing County, 1,600 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU, 3nd instar larvae in rotten wood 30.XII.2017 , adult emerged V.2018.
Redescription (male). General: Body length 14.0–16.0 mm; width 6.0–8.0 mm, widest at humeral umbone. Body reddish-brown to dark brown. Surface with fulvous, brown, light yellow and black setae, and yellow tomentous maculae. Head: Dark brown. Dorsal surface densely clad with fulvous setae, setae longer on frons. Anterior margin of clypeus nearly straight and slightly raised. Frons flat ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–23 ). Maxillary palpus and labial palpus dark brown to black. Antenna brown; antennal club long, about 1.5 times length of antennomeres 2–7 combined; inner side of antennomere 8 with short, dense, fulvous setae ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–23 ). Ventral surface clad with long, fulvous setae ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Pronotum: Brown. Widest at basolateral angle, basomedian area depressed. Lateral margin curved; posterior margin distinctly protruded; surface densely clad with long, fulvous setae ( Figs. 145, 147 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Scutellum: Dark brown to black, with long, dense, fulvous setae. Elytron: Reddish-brown to brown; with posthumeral macula, lateral macula, and median macula; without distal macula. Surface densely clad with setae; setae long between sutural and discolateral costae; setae light yellow on maculae; setae dark brown to black on lateral declivity; setae fulvous on the rest of elytron; humeral umbone glabrous ( Figs. 145, 147 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Mesepimeron, metepisternum and metepimeron: Black, surface clad with dense, fulvous setae. Sternum: Preprosternum black, sides clad with sparse, fulvous setae. Mesosternum black, densely clad with long, fulvous setae. Mesometasternal process short, glabrous, black, apex rounded; mesometasternal suture depressed, clad with long, dense, fulvous setae. Metasternum black, clad with dense, fulvous setae; middle portion glabrous ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Pygidium: Dark brown; surface densely clad with long setae; setae fulvous in middle and dark brown on sides ( Figs. 80–81 View FIGURES 72–98 ). Abdomen: Dark brown to black. Without median groove. Six abdominal sternites visible; sternites evenly clad with dense, fulvous setae, but setae sparse in median; setae on sternite II long; setae on sternites III–V short, but longer on sides; setae near posterior margin of sternite VI long, dense; sternite VII almost glabrous, with sparse, short setae on sides. Sternites II–V densely clad with black and yellow setae in dorsal and lateral portion ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Legs: Slender, simple. Metacoxa black; with long, light yellow and brown setae. Femora and tibia dark brown; with long, fulvous and light yellow setae. Tiny teeth between 3 large teeth of protibia distinct ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 24–47 ); mesotibia with a spine near the middle of outer margin; the spine of metatibia indistinct or absent; metatibia with a row of brush-like, fulvous setae along inner margin ( Figs. 145–147 View FIGURES 145–150 ); dorsal and outer teeth of metatibia shorter than basitarsus of metatarsus ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 48–65 ). Tarsi dark brown; basitarsus of metatarsus with a cluster of sparse, long setae ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 48–65 ). Genitalia: Parameres broad, short; apex rounded, not expanded. Apical half of interparameral split constricted; base with membrane, distinctly divided in medial. Median lobe ribbon-like, base distinctly broad; less than twice length of paramere ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 111–122 ).
Female. Body length 14.5–16.0 mm; width 6.5–7.0 mm. Except for sexual dimorphism characteristics of the genus, setae on body surface shorter ( Figs. 148–150 View FIGURES 145–150 ); dorsal and outer teeth of metatibia larger, and longer than basitarsus of metatarsus ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 48–65 ); basitarsus of metatarsus with less setae ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 48–65 ).
Variability. Posthumeral maculae and/or median maculae are absent in some individuals (including the holotype, Figs. 145, 148 View FIGURES 145–150 , 227 View FIGURES 227–234 ).
Differential diagnosis. Length of clypeus almost equal to width. Antenna brown ( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 1–23 ). Pronotum densely clad with fulvous long setae. Elytra usually with posthumeral maculae, median maculae and lateral maculae ( Figs. 145, 147–148, 150 View FIGURES 145–150 ). Pygidium without macula ( Figs. 80–83 View FIGURES 72–98 ). Abdominal sides without yellow maculae ( Figs. 146, 149 View FIGURES 145–150 ); male abdomen without median groove. Protibia with indistinct tiny teeth ( Figs. 29–30 View FIGURES 24–47 ). Spine of metatibia indistinct or absent; dorsal tooth of male metatibia shorter than basitarsus of metatarsus ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 48–65 ).
This species is similar to M. fulvoguttatus , but can be differentiated by elytron without distal macula ( Figs. 209–210 View FIGURES 203–214 ; in M. fulvoguttatus always present and distinct, Figs. 207–208 View FIGURES 203–214 ), posthumeral macula sometimes absent ( Fig. 148 View FIGURES 145–150 ; in M. fulvoguttatus always present and distinct, Figs. 141, 143 View FIGURES 141–144 ), abdominal sides without maculae ( Figs. 146, 149 View FIGURES 145–150 ; in M. fulvoguttatus present, Figs. 142, 144 View FIGURES 141–144 ), tiny teeth of male protibia smaller ( Figs. 29–30 View FIGURES 24–47 ), parameres broader, and median lobe shorter ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 111–122 ).
Distribution. China: Sichuan.
Natural history. Using knowledge of larval habitats obtained from Macronotops olivaceofuscus , we successfully found larvae of this species from Baoxing County in the fall of 2014. By the continually searching of similar humid forested valleys in western Sichuan in the following years, many larvae were captured in autumn and winter. The larvae are usually found under bark or inhabit tunnels in rotten wood, which are made by Lucanidae larvae ( Figs. 264–265 View FIGURES 261–268 ). Pupal cells formed in April under artificial condition and adults emergence in May. In the field, an adult in a pupal cell was found as early as June, but adults usually caught in early August according to the label date.
Remarks. The number of type specimens of Macronotops fulvopilosus was not indicated by Fairmaire (1894), but the measurement was given only as a single value in the original description. There was no other conspecific specimen bearing similar label data in MNHN, it is probably the only type. The type specimen was collected from the valley of “Tong-Ho”, i.e. the river Tonghe (Tung Ho) in Sichuan. Early Westerners’ travels usually referred to this name as the whole reach of the river Daduhe (see maps in Pratt 1892; Wilson 1913; Limpricht 1922), but Chinese locals regard “Tong-Ho” as only lower reach of the river Daduhe (Tatu Ho) from Jinkouhe (Chin-kou-ho) near Mount Washan (E 103°01'38.57", N 29°19'32.76", Fig. 259 View FIGURES 258–260 ). The valley is hot and dry in Luding, but it is humid and forested in lower reach where more likely to be the collecting site of the syntype.
Macronotops fulvopilosus View in CoL is a very rare species and which has been known only the type specimen for more than hundred years. Only one female specimen was found in the European museums we visited and labeled with an imprecise location information. Mikšić (1976) presumably did not examine the holotype due to he stated that placing this species in the genus Macronotops View in CoL was merely based on the original description. Krikken (1977) considered this species could not be satisfactorily distinguished from M. fulvoguttatus View in CoL and M. vuilleti because of insufficient material. So that the status of M. fulvopilosus View in CoL remained doubtful. The additional specimens of M. fulvopilosus View in CoL we collected from the mountainous area between the valley of river Daduhe and the Sichuan basin allowed us to compare it with other species better. We confirmed the validity of this species by the protibial teeth, the yellow setae on the pronotum and the shape of the parameres.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Cetoniinae |
Genus |
Macronotops fulvopilosus ( Fairmaire, 1894 )
Qiu, Jian-Yue, Xu, Hao & Chen, Li 2019 |
Taeniodera fulvopilosa
Fairmaire, L. 1894: 219 |