Echymipera rufescens (Peters & Doria, 1875)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.6621742 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620312 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C91729-FFDC-FFBC-F8A6-DD76FD8213C6 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Echymipera rufescens |
| status |
|
13. View Plate 22: Peramelidae
Long-nosed Echymipera
Echymipera rufescens View in CoL
French: Bandicoot roux / German: Roter Stachelnasenbeutler / Spanish: Bandicut espinoso de hocico largo
Other common names: Rufescent Bandicoot, Rufous Spiny Bandicoot
Taxonomy. Perameles rufescens Peters & Doria, 1875 ,
“Insulae Kei [= Kai Island],” Indonesia.
Taxonomic status of several insular populations is in need of revision; taxonomic position of populations on Aru Islands and Kai Islands and those on D’Entrecasteaux Islands remains particularly uncertain. Two subspecies generally recognized.
Subspecies and Distribution.
E. r. australis Tate, 1948 — Cape York, NE Australia. View Figure
Descriptive notes. Head-body 21.5-54.5 cm,tail 7.5-11.5 cm; weight 0.3-3 kg. The subspecies australis is smaller of the two subspecies, males attaining head-body length of up to 48 cm and weight of up to 2-2 kg, compared with 54-5 cm and 3 kg, respectively, for nominate rufescens , a small form of latter occurs in Sepik region and a much larger form in Gulf Province. In both subspecies body weight of males may average 70% more than that of females, although occasional females may approach male body size. Dorsal fur is tawny, dark brown or rufous with characteristically stiff, broad, spiky hairs that give pelage a brindled appearance; ventral fur is pale. Crown of head is dark, often black, grading to pale gray on face and throat but with no hint of striping; snout is notably elongated, ears are short and round, and tail short, black, and naked. This species is variable in size and color, with small individuals similar in appearance to female Clara’s Echymipera ( E. clara ) and the Common Echymipera ( E. kalubu ); can be distinguished from these two byits usually more rufous toning and the presence of a small black pad on hindfoot.
Habitat. In New Guinea occurs in grassland, scrub, lowland rainforest, and foothill forest at altitudes from sea level to 1200 m, occasionally to 2100 m; found also in generally drier and more disturbed habitats than other species in genus. It occupies similar habitats in Australia, but occurs there also in coastal closed heath and extends into drier country along gallery forest, from sea level to 800 m. May rest in logs or under leaflitter in sheltered sites in a similar manner to that of other peramelids, but present species also shows considerable propensity to construct burrows. In Australia, burrow complexes may be 50-80 cm deep, cover up to 3 m? in area, and have two or more entrances.
Food and Feeding. In the most detailed study of the diet of this echymipera, at Iron Range, on Cape York Peninsula,fruits and seeds comprised ¢.27% of diet, followed by invertebrates (26%), fungi (19%), and the remains ofleafy plants (18%); other foods included plant roots and soil, grass, and small vertebrates. Pronounced seasonal variation in the amount of each food type consumed probably reflected changes in food availability. More limited information for New Guinea suggests that diet there is similar. Food obtained from forest floor or by excavation; as with many other peramelids, this species’ presence can often be detected by the finding of conical holes 20-30 cm deep that the animals have dug with their powerful forelimbs.
Breeding. In Iron Range study, females carried pouch young between November and May, 80-100% of females carrying young during peak of wet season from January to March. Litter size was 1-4 (average 2-8), larger females carrying more young and producing up to two litters per season. Females produced on average 4-9 young per year. Females have eight nipples. Reproductive effort appears similar, or perhaps spread over longer period, in New Guinea, where females recorded as carrying young in pouch in May, October, March, and August. Growth of young appears to be slower than in other peramelids that have been well studied; young leave pouch at c.65 days, are weaned at 70 days, and become sexually mature at 4-5 months.
Activity patterns. Rests by day, and is believed to be strictly nocturnal in both its Australian and its New Guinean ranges.
Movements, Home range and Social organization. There is some evidence that animals make repeated use of the same paths through vegetation and that range areas are of the order of 1-2 ha. Captive individuals are intensely intolerant of each other, and males, in particular, often bear scars and wounds inflicted in fights. Despite such mutual intolerance, local population density can be high if resources are available. At Iron Range, 48 resident animals were present on a grid of 2-25 ha, equating ostensibly to a density of 21 ind/ha; true density would have been less than this as the grid probably sampled an area greater than 2-25 ha, but would still have exceeded 10 ind/ha.
Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Has a decreasing population trend. In New Guinea, nominate subspecies is considered to be uncommon in most parts of its range, although it can achieve high abundance locally if conditionsare suitable. It has a large geographical range, occurs in a number of protected areas, and may be tolerant of at least some habitat disturbance. It is, nonetheless, a favored game species and is susceptible to overhunting. There is also anecdotal evidence that it is susceptible to the gross habitat disturbance that accompanies mining and the forest-firing and clearing that precedes production of commercial crops such as oil palm ( Elaeis guineensis, Arecaceae ). Thus, while nominate rufescens is declining in some areas, the overall rate of decline appears slow and the subspecies cannot be considered at risk. In Australia, subspecies australis appears to be secure. It faces no obvious or immediate threats, has not declined in its distributional range, and remains locally abundantin suitable habitat.
Bibliography. Collins (1973), Flannery (1995a, 1995b), George & Maynes (1990), Gordon & Lawrie (1978), Gordon et al. (1990), Groves (2005¢c), Groves & Flannery (1990), Hide et al. (1984), Menzies (2011), Shevill & Johnson (2007), Tate (1948b), Tate & Archbold (1937), Westerman, Kear et al. (2012), Westerman, Springer & Krajewski (2001), Ziegler (1977, 1982).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.