Leptinaria unilamellata (d’Orbigny, 1838)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15560/17.1.269 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5465048 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787FE-314C-C01B-4CDE-8B24FDE873ED |
|
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
|
scientific name |
Leptinaria unilamellata (d’Orbigny, 1838) |
| status |
|
Leptinaria unilamellata (d’Orbigny, 1838) View in CoL
Figure 3T–V
Helix unilamellata d’Orbigny 1835: 9 [nomen nudum].
[ Achatina lamellata View in CoL ] Potiez and Michaud 1835: pl. 11, figs. 7, 8 [figure only, no name].
Bulimus unilamellata d’Orbigny 1838: 257 .
Achatina lamellata Potiez and Michaud 1838: 128 View in CoL .
Material examined. Brazil • Acre, Porto Acre , HFR; 09°45′04″S, 067°40′23″W; 16.XII.2018; W. Lima and M. Lima leg.; 1, UFAC 1039 GoogleMaps .
Type locality. Undefined; nevertheless, Delannoye et al. (2015) listed Santa Cruz, Bolivia, as the possible type locality.
Distribution. Nicaragua to Brazil ( Simone 2006; Delannoye et al. 2015). It has been introduced to French Polynesia and identified as a greenhouse species in Europe ( Soubeyran 2008; Proschwitz 2017).
Remarks. The confusing taxonomy of this species and the dispute between the names L. unilamellata (d’Orbigny, 1838) and L. lamellata ( Potiez & Michaud, 1838) has just been resolved by Breure et al. (2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Leptinaria unilamellata (d’Orbigny, 1838)
| de Lima, Marcos Silva, Silva, Fernanda dos Santos, Simone, Luiz Ricardo Lopes, Salvador, Rodrigo Brincalepe & Guilherme, Edson 2021 |
Achatina lamellata
| Potiez VL & Michaud ALG 1838: 128 |
Helix unilamellata d’Orbigny 1835: 9
| d'Orbigny A 1835: 9 |