Tenedos carlosprietoi, Martínez & Brescovit & Quijano, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5130.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABF61117-DD64-4A32-BD61-20E577F80C3D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7625319 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787B1-FF76-FF02-D49C-FF3C09C4FE42 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tenedos carlosprietoi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tenedos carlosprietoi View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 100–104 View FIGURE 100 View FIGURE 101 View FIGURE 102 View FIGURE 103 View FIGURE 104 ; 106 View FIGURE 106 .
Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA. Meta: San Juanito, Vereda Plan de San Luis, Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza , San José , Andean forest and Páramo , Pitfall trap, 2990m [4°29′38″N, 73°41′33″W], L. Quintero & M. Torres leg., 22-24.XI.2003, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-605) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: same data as the holotype, 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-3007), 1 ♀ (IAvHI-3008), 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-3009). Cundinamarca: Caseta, Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza, Andean forest fragment, Pitfall trap, 3025m [4°31′N, 73°45′W], A. Cifuentes leg., 22-28.VIII.2003, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-606), 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-614) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronymic in honor of the eminent lepidopterologist Carlos Prieto, by his many contributions to the taxonomy and systematic of the family Lycaenidae .
Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos carlosprietoi sp. n., resemble those of T. andes Jocqué & Baert, 2002 and T. medina sp. n., by presence of basal retrolateral tibial apophysis (bRTA), rounded median apophysis (MA) (see Jocqué & Baert, 2002: 83, fig. 7A–B; figs 94A–D; 95A–B; 97A–D, 98A–B; 99A–F; 101A–D; 102A–B; 104A–D), but can be distinguished by larger median apophysis, apically bifid basal retrolateral tibial apophysis; wider retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) ( Figs 101A–D View FIGURE 101 ; 102A–B View FIGURE 102 ; 104A–D View FIGURE 104 ). Females are similar to those of Tenedos andes Jocqué & Baert, 2002 and T. medina sp. n., by the large median field plate (MFP) ( Figs 94E–F View FIGURE 94 ; 95C–D View FIGURE 95 ; 97E–F View FIGURE 97 , 98C–D View FIGURE 98 ; 101E–F View FIGURE 101 ; 102C–D View FIGURE 102 ; 104E–F View FIGURE 104 ), but can be recognized by longer than wide, cylindrical-shaped atrium (A), very wider seminal receptacles (SR), ending at anterior region of median septum of epigyne, wider and longer lateral borders (LB) ( Figs 101E–F View FIGURE 101 ; 102C–D View FIGURE 102 ; 104E–F View FIGURE 104 ).
Description. Male (Holotype, IAvH-I-605). Coloration ( Fig. 100A–B View FIGURE 100 ): carapace with light brown cephalic region, dark-brown in margins. Chelicerae with paturon brown, fangs brown-reddish. Endites light brown, white on anterior region. Labium and sternum brown. Legs: Coxae I–IV pale brown. Femora I–IV light brown, apically dark brown. Patellae-tarsi I–IV brown. Abdomen: dorsally light gray with a dorsal and large scutum, occupying from anterior to medial region and seven white guanine spots organized as follows: all spots are long, transversals and anteriorly projected, forming triangles. The bands decrease in size to the posterior region, and extended to the lateral edges. Ventrally light gray with two large and very wide spots, covering almost all the surface of the abdomen. Spinnerets light brown. Measurements: total length 6.57, carapace length 3.33, width 2.31, height 1.22. Clypeus height 0.72. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.11, PME 0.10, PLE 0.14; AME–AME 0.23, AME–ALE 0.25, AME–PME 0.30, PME–PME 0.28, PME–PLE 0.50, ALE–PLE 0.29. Chelicerae 1.23 length. Sternum length 1.27, width 1.20. Legs: I—femur 1.92/ patella 0.73/ tibia 1.62/ metatarsus 1.56/ tarsus 1.15/ total 6.98; II—1.70/ 0.68/ 1.25/ 1.32/ 0.88/ 5.83; III—1.57/ 0.74/ 1.19/ 1.43/ 0.74/ 5.67; IV—2.05/ 0.91/ 1.76/ 2.19/ 0.87/ 7.78. Abdomen length 2.73. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): II—tibia v1r-1r-0; III—tibia v2-0-2. Palp: retrolateral process of cymbium (RPC) long, wide with small projection on medial region; tegulum (T) large, globose, almost as long as wide; subtegulum (St) very developed, longer than wide in ventral view; conductor (C) large, wide, with short, wide sclerotized region on distal side; appendix (ApC) short, apically sharp; embolus (E) laminar at base, filiform towards apex; base of embolus (EB) with several short projections, approximately as long as half as basal tegular membrane; basal tegular membrane (BTM) originated basally on tegulum, proximally flattened, without defined appendix; spermatic ducts (SD) S-shaped with anterior fold more open and thinner than posterior; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) large, triangular-shaped in ventral view; median apophysis (MA) large, concave, rounded; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) large, almost as long as palpal tibia, shovel-shaped; basal retrolateral tibial apophysis (bRTA) short, apically bifid, with a posterior, sharp projection ( Figs 101A–D View FIGURE 101 ; 102A–B View FIGURE 102 ; 104A–D View FIGURE 104 ).
Female (IAvH-I-3007). Coloration and abdominal pattern of spots as male, carapace and legs uniformly brown; the bands on abdomen are more dispersed ( Fig. 100C–D View FIGURE 100 ). Measurements: total length 6.48, carapace length 3.27, width 2.24, height 1.66. Clypeus height 0.58. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.11, ALE 0.10, PME 0.10, PLE 0.14; AME–AME 0.24, AME–ALE 0.26, AME–PME 0.29, PME–PME 0.28, PME–PLE 0.45, ALE–PLE 0.33. Chelicerae 0.98 length. Sternum length 1.26, width 1.20. Legs: I—femur 1.97/ patella 0.88/ tibia 1.71/ metatarsus 1.30/ tarsus 0.78/ total 6.64; II—1.64/ 0.84/ 1.43/ 0.92/ 0.54/ 5.37; III—1.42/ 0.87/ 1.22/ 0.94/ 0.59/ 5.04; IV—2.04/ 1.01/ 1.53/ 1.65/ 0.76/ 6.99. Abdomen length 3.32. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I—tibia v1r-1r-0, metatarsus v1r-0-2; III—tibia v1r-1p-2; IV—tibia v2-1p- 1p. Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) short, very wide, curved towards posterior region of epigyne, forming posterior oval atrium (A); median field plate (MFP) large, quadrangular-shaped; copulatory ducts (CD) very short, wide, almost undistinguished from spermathecae; seminal receptacles (SR) long, very wide, curved towards anteriomedian septum; spermathecae (S) large, irregulars, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) almost as long as spermathecae length ( Figs 101E–F View FIGURE 101 ; 102C–D View FIGURE 102 ; 104E–F View FIGURE 104 ).
Variation. Males (n=3): total length: 6.57–7.32; carapace length: 3.33–3.53; femur I length: 1.09–1.92. Females (n=3): total length: 5.53–6.48; carapace length: 3.27–3.48; femur I length: 0.99–1.97. Population of Tenedos carlosprietoi sp. n. distributed in Cundinamarca department exhibits the following variations in both sexual and somatic features: the prosome present lighter color tonalities, the anterior abdominal scutum is wider and longer ( Fig. 103A–D View FIGURE 103 ), and the variation of spines patterns is I—tibia v1r-1r-1p; II—tibia v1r-1r-1r; IV—tibia v2-2-2. Retrolateral tibial apophysis longer, apically sharp, very short and lightly apically bifid retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Fig. 104A–D View FIGURE 104 ). Females are presenting a shorter atrium and lateral borders and longer seminal receptacles ( Fig. 104E–F View FIGURE 104 ).
Distribution. Known from Cundinamarca and Meta departments, Colombia ( Fig. 106 View FIGURE 106 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |