Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans)
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3865.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA1F0F7D-25A3-4084-8F2C-99AF9A45DFCC |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C78780-885F-FFC6-FF00-FC1BFC8CF83C |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) |
| status |
|
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans)
Typhlodromus cucumeris Oudemans, 1930: 69 ; Nesbitt, 1951: 23; Hirschmann, 1962: 2; Spain & Luxton, 1971: 187.
Typhlodromus thripsi MacGill 1939: 310 . (synonymy by Evans, 1952: 416; Chant, 1959: 78; Schuster & Gonzalez, 1963: 185; Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 609; Schicha, 1976: 337; Chant et al., 1978: 1346).
Typhlodromus bellinus Womersley, 1954: 177 . (synonymy by Dosse, 1957: 307; Schuster & Gonzalez, 1963: 185; Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; Athias-Henriot, 1960 a: 297; 1966: 207; Chant & Hansell, 1971: 721; Chant et al., 1978: 1346; not synonym, according to Schicha, 1976: 340).
Typhlodromus ( Amblyseius) cucumeris .— Chant, 1959: 78.
Amblyseius ( Typhlodromopsis) cucumeris .— De Leon, 1959: 113.
Amblyseius ( Amblyseius) cucumeris . — Wainstein, 1962 b: 16; Ehara, 1966: 20; Ueckermann & Loots, 1988: 147.
Amblyseius cucumeris . — Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; El-Badry, 1970: 502; Livshitz & Kuznetsov, 1972: 25; Beglyarov, 1981: 39; Nasr & Abou-Awad, 1985: 246; Zaher, 1986: 111; Papadoulis & Emmanouel, 1991: 52; Swirski et al., 1998: 105.
Typhlodromus ( Typhlodromus) cucumeris .— Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 609.
Amblyseius coprophilus Karg, 1970: 289 . (synonymy by Karg, 1971: 213; Chant & McMurtry, 2003: 21).
Neoseiulus cucumeris . — Moraes et al., 1986: 76; 2004: 115; Beard, 2001: 103; Congdon, 2002: 23; Denmark & Edland, 2002: 211; Papadoulis et al., 2009: 79; Ramadan et al., 2009: 118; Ferragut et al., 2010: 84.
Female (two specimens).
Dorsal shield strongly reticulate; 351, 346 long and 182, 164 wide, with 17 pairs of setae. Setae j 1 18, 16; j 3 23, 21; j 4 13, 12; j 5 10, 9; j 6 13, 11; J 2 16, 14; J 5 13, 11; z 2 13, 12; z 4 13, 12; z 5 10, 8; Z 1 16, 15; Z 4 26, 24; Z 5 60, 57; s 4 18, 17; S 2 21, 19; S 4 21, 19; S 5 26, 25; r 3 23, 21; R 1 21, 19. Dorsal setae smooth, except Z 4 and Z 5, slightly serrate. Peritreme extending forward to level of j 3.
Venter. Sternal shield smooth with few lateral striae, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures. Distances between st 1 –st 1 33, 30; st 2 –st 2 60, 58; st 3 –st 3 65, 61; st 4 –st 4 70, 68. Genital shield weakly striate; distance between st 5 –st 5 68, 67. Ventrianal shield subpentagonal, reticulate; 117, 107 long, 96, 88 wide at ZV 2 level and 81, 75 wide at level of anus; with three pairs of pre-anal setae and a pair of pre-anal pores. Seta JV 5 39, 38. Ventral setae smooth, except JV 5, slightly serrate. Two pairs of metapodal plates.
Spermatheca. Calyx of spermatheca saccular, 10, 9 long; atrium distinct.
Gnathosoma. Corniculi slightly convergent distally; basal width of corniculus 4, distance between bases of corniculi 8. Movable cheliceral digit 31, 30 long, with one tooth; fixed digit 29, 28 long, with three teeth.
Legs. Macroseta sharp-tipped: Sge IV 34, 33; Sti IV 33, 32; St IV 49, 44; chaetotaxy of genu II 2, 2/ 0, 2 / 0, 1; genu III 1, 2/ 1, 2 / 0, 1.
Specimens examined. Two females from mango leaves, at the Faculty of Agriculture Farm, Cairo University, Giza governorate, June 1980 (coll. M.A. Zaher).
Previous records from Egypt. Fayoum governorate ( Romeih et al., 2010 b); Giza governorate (Zaher & El- Badry, 1962; El-Badry, 1970; Zaher, 1986; Romeih et al., 2010 b); unspecified governorate ( Chant, 1959).
Remarks. Neoseiulus cucumeris was originally described from the holotype female collected in France. The original description was brief, only with measurements of the idiosoma and no illustration; complementary descriptions were listed by Demite et al. ( 2014). Our measurements are close to those reported by Zaher ( 1986) for a single female, except s 4 ( 40 according to that author).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans)
| Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. & De, Gilberto J. 2014 |
Neoseiulus cucumeris
| Ferragut 2010: 84 |
| Papadoulis 2009: 79 |
| Ramadan 2009: 118 |
| Congdon 2002: 23 |
| Denmark 2002: 211 |
| Beard 2001: 103 |
| Moraes 1986: 76 |
Amblyseius coprophilus
| Chant 2003: 21 |
| Karg 1971: 213 |
| Karg 1970: 289 |
Amblyseius cucumeris
| Swirski 1998: 105 |
| Papadoulis 1991: 52 |
| Zaher 1986: 111 |
| Nasr 1985: 246 |
| Beglyarov 1981: 39 |
| Livshitz 1972: 25 |
| El-Badry 1970: 502 |
| Schuster 1963: 277 |
Typhlodromus ( Typhlodromus ) cucumeris
| Westerboer 1963: 609 |
Amblyseius ( Amblyseius ) cucumeris
| Ueckermann 1988: 147 |
| Ehara 1966: 20 |
| Wainstein 1962: 16 |
Typhlodromus ( Amblyseius ) cucumeris
| Chant 1959: 78 |
Amblyseius ( Typhlodromopsis ) cucumeris
| De 1959: 113 |
Typhlodromus bellinus
| Schicha 1976: 340 |
| Chant 1971: 721 |
| Schuster 1963: 185 |
| Schuster 1963: 277 |
| Athias-Henriot 1960: 297 |
| Dosse 1957: 307 |
| Womersley 1954: 177 |
Typhlodromus thripsi
| Schicha 1976: 337 |
| Schuster 1963: 185 |
| Schuster 1963: 277 |
| Westerboer 1963: 609 |
| Chant 1959: 78 |
| Evans 1952: 416 |
| MacGill 1939: 310 |
Typhlodromus cucumeris
| Spain 1971: 187 |
| Hirschmann 1962: 2 |
| Nesbitt 1951: 23 |
| Oudemans 1930: 69 |
