Apeba togata ( Klug, 1825 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4247.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C57A640C-1A30-478F-9114-547B7CA914BB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6044912 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C6D543-FFA6-FFD2-FF4E-FF7BFC006851 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Apeba togata ( Klug, 1825 ) |
status |
|
Apeba togata ( Klug, 1825) View in CoL
( Figs 11–12 View FIGURES 1 – 14. 1 – 12 , 24–30 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 )
Saperda togata Klug, 1825: 464 View in CoL , pl. 42, fig. 10.
Spathoptera View in CoL ? togata View in CoL ; Audinet-Serville, 1835: 52.
Saperda tagita ; Chenu, 1851: pl. 23, fig. 1 (error).
Lycidola togata View in CoL ; Thomson, 1868: 191; Lacordaire, 1872: 884; Bates, 1881b: 306; Aurivillius, 1923: 585 (cat.); Blackwelder, 1946: 622 (checklist); Gilmour, 1965: 632 (cat.).
Hemilophus togatus View in CoL ; Gemminger & Harold, 1873: 3211 (cat.).
Apeba togata View in CoL ; Martins & Galileo, 1991a: 563, figs. 3, 12; Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 282 (checklist); Monné, 1995: 4 (cat.); 2005: 453 (cat.); Monné, et al., 2010: 248 (distr.); Martins & Galileo, 2014a: 65, fig. 1.36; Monné, 2016: 706 (cat.).
Lycaneptia antiqua Waterhouse, 1880: 300 View in CoL ; Bates, 1881b: 306; Aurivillius, 1923: 585 (cat.); Blackwelder, 1946: 622 (checklist). Syn. nov.
Lycaneptia antica View in CoL ; Buck, 1959: 608 (Misspelling).
Lycaneptia antigua View in CoL ; Gilmour, 1965: 633 (cat.) (Misspelling).
Hemilophus antiquus View in CoL ; Lameere, 1883: 73 (cat.).
Apeba antiqua View in CoL ; Martins & Galileo, 1991a: 563; Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 282 (checklist); Monné, 1995: 4 (cat.); 2005: 452 (cat.); Martins & Galileo, 2014a: 62, fig. 1.38; Monné, 2016: 706 (cat.).
According to Waterhouse (1880), Lycidola antiqua (= A. antiqua ) differs from L. togata View in CoL (= A. togata View in CoL ) by the different color and by the last seven antennomeres not equaling a quarter of the total length of the antennae. Our examination reveals the last seven antennomeres in A. togata View in CoL are the same as those in L. antiqua , as is the pubescence on head and pronotum, and the color of the femora. Hence, we believe that A. antiqua is simply a variation of A. togata View in CoL and thus place it in synonymy with L. togata View in CoL .
The specimens deposited at MZSP ( Figs 24–29 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ) clearly show color variation in the elytral pubescence of A. togata . In addition, the sides of the prothorax may ( Figs 25, 29 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ) or may not have ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ) yellow pubescent band. The outermost carina is also somewhat variable: from slightly curved at about midlength to almost straight. No other consistent morphological differences were noted.
According to Martins & Galileo (2014a) (translated): “In a specimen from Bahia (MZSP) all anterior 3/4 of the elytra are yellow [ Figs 28–29 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ]. In this specimen was based the citation of A. antiqua for Bahia ( MARTINS & GALILEO, 1991a).” The specimen from Linhares (Espírito Santo) listed by Martins & Galileo (2014a) as male actually is a female. Martins & Galileo (2014a) also correctly pointed out (translated): “ HAASE (1892), est. 13, fig. 102) and HEINE & TASCHEMBERG [sic] (1907: 244, est. 37, fig. 13) presented wrong figures of Apeba togata ; the figure in Haase has the elytra narrower and that of Heyne & Taschemberg [sic] has elytra that could be of A. togata , but the color pattern is completely different.” Hemilophus togatus sensu Haase (1892) , clearly is not Apeba togata . The species illustrated may belong to the Rhinotragini (Cerambycinae) , not Hemilophini (Lamiinae) , however, this is not possible to determine without examining the specimen. For the same reason, Hemilophus togatus sensu Heyne & Taschenberg (1908) should be excluded from the list of references of Apeba togata . Assuming that the drawing is accurate, the specimen figured by these authors has the antennae longer than body, while in A. togata it is distinctly shorter. Again, it is not possible to know the species of the specimen figured without examining it.
Material examined. BRAZIL, Bahia: Água Preta , 1 female, 1938, Bondar col. ( MZSP) ( Figs 28–29 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ) . Espírito Santo: Linhares , 1 female, X.1972, P. C. Elias col. ( MZSP) ( Figs 24–25 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ) . Santa Catarina: Rio Vermelho (currently São Bento do Sul), 1 female, III.1962, Dirings ( MZSP) ( Figs 26–27 View FIGURES 24 – 37. 24 – 30 ).
MZSP |
Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Hemilophini |
Genus |
Apeba togata ( Klug, 1825 )
Galileo, Maria Helena M., Santos-Silva, Antonio & Wappes, James E. 2017 |
Apeba togata
Monne 2016: 706 |
Martins 2014: 65 |
Monne 2010: 248 |
Monne 1995: 4 |
Monne 1994: 282 |
Martins 1991: 563 |
Apeba antiqua
Monne 2016: 706 |
Martins 2014: 62 |
Monne 1995: 4 |
Monne 1994: 282 |
Martins 1991: 563 |
Lycaneptia antigua
Gilmour 1965: 633 |
Lycaneptia antica
Buck 1959: 608 |
Hemilophus antiquus
Lameere 1883: 73 |
Lycaneptia antiqua
Blackwelder 1946: 622 |
Aurivillius 1923: 585 |
Bates 1881: 306 |
Waterhouse 1880: 300 |
Hemilophus togatus
Gemminger 1873: 3211 |
Lycidola togata
Gilmour 1965: 632 |
Blackwelder 1946: 622 |
Aurivillius 1923: 585 |
Bates 1881: 306 |
Lacordaire 1872: 884 |
Thomson 1868: 191 |
Spathoptera
Audinet-Serville 1835: 52 |
Saperda togata
Klug 1825: 464 |