Porrhomma microphthalmum ( O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4481.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFC4982D-BB84-4141-BDFD-203F23CD1585 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5963990 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C6A93B-FFF2-FFF3-FF7C-FAC287413DAD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Porrhomma microphthalmum ( O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 ) |
status |
|
Porrhomma microphthalmum ( O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871) View in CoL
Figs. 31A–F View FIGURE 31 .
Linyphia microphthalma O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 — O. Pickard-Cambridge (1871): p. 434, Pl. 56, no. 25 (descr. ♂); transferred by Simon (1884); examined by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1894) and Jackson (1913).
L. decens O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 — O. Pickard-Cambridge (1871): p. 436, Pl. 56, no. 27 (descr. ♂); examined by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1894) and Jackson (1913); synonymised by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1895).
Linyphia View in CoL ? incerta O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1878 — O. Pickard-Cambridge (1878): p. 117, Pl. XI, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 (descr. ♀); examined by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1894) and Jackson (1913); synonymised by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1895).
Porrhomma microphthalma — Simon (1884): p. 372.
Opistoxys acuta Simon, 1884 — Simon (1884): p. 373, Figs. 148–149 (descr. ♂); examined and synonymised by Thaler (1975).
P. meadii F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 — F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1894): p. 101, Pl. II, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 (descr. ♂ ♀); synonymised by F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1895).
P. microphthalmum View in CoL — F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (1895): p. 36; synonymy.
P. microphthalmum — Jackson (1913): p. 41, Pl. II, Figs. 16 View FIGURE 16 , 26 View FIGURE 26 (♂ ♀); synonymy.
P. microphthalmum microphthalmum — Tretzel (1956): p. 54.
P. microphthalmum — Thaler (1975): p. 142, Figs. 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 ; synonymy.
P. microphthalmum — Růžička (2009): p. 1086, Figs. 3–4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 , 7 View FIGURE 7 (♂).
Material examined. CZECHIA: Krkonoše Mts., Pec pod Sněžkou , Úpská Rašelina Peatbog , 18 Jun –4 Jul 1984, 1 Ƌ, leg. J. Vaněk. Skuteč-Borek, 22 Apr –4 Jun 2005, 14 Ƌ 11 ♀, leg. V. Laška & I . H. Tuf. Velký Osek, 16 Aug 1994, 2 Ƌ 1 ♀, leg. J. Zelený. Třeboň-Přeseka, 24 Jun –11 Jul 1977, 1 Ƌ, leg. V. Růžička. České Budějovice, 1 Apr – 2 Jun 2002, 18 Ƌ 18 ♀, leg. L. Šimek ( IECA). Drahanovice, 29 Aug 1991, 1 ♀, leg. J. Svatoň ( WSM) . KAZAKHSTAN: East Kazakhstan Area, Kalbinsky District, 60 km WNW of Ust’ -Kamenogorsk, env. of Dongaly , 4 Jun 1997, 1 ♀, leg. R. Dudko & V. Zinchenko ( ZMMU).
Diagnosis. Porrhomma microphthalmum can be distinguished from other species of the microphthalmum - group by fully developed eyes.
Description. ♀ (from České Budějovice, Czechia, 1 Apr–2 Jun 2002). Carapace greyish brown, 0 67 mm wide, eyes normal, PME–PME = 1.0 ( Fig. 31A View FIGURE 31 ). Abdomen brown-grey. Fe I–II with one dorsal spine, Fe I with one prolateral spine. Ti I with one prolateral spine, Ti I–II with one retrolateral spine. Tm Mt I = 0.33, Mt I/CW = 0.84.
Epigynum rather square in appearance, broad side loops of the copulatory ducts are seen as circular windows at sides of the pit ( Fig. 31C View FIGURE 31 ). Conspicuous fold is formed in the uppermost part of the vulva, short descending part of the ducts ends with a spermatheca ( Figs. 31D–F View FIGURE 31 ).
Ƌ (together with female). Embolus long with a broad velum containing a pigmented spot. AP relatively short, approximately twice as long as broad, and reaches maximally up to the end of the velum ( Fig. 31B View FIGURE 31 ). The free end of the embolus is approximately as long as the velum is wide ( Fig. 33A View FIGURE 33 ).
Variation. Ƌ ♀. Carapace 0.60–0.70 mm wide. Tm Mt I = 0.29–0.38, Mt I/CW = 0.83–1.00 (n = 41).
Comments. Bathyphantes charpentieri was removed from the synonymy of P. microphthalmum ; see P. convexum .
Ecology. A common spider of various open habitats—rock steppes, meadows, subalpine zones, also fields and various dumps in early successional stages ( Růžička & Hejkal 1997).
Global distribution. Europe after Helsdingen (2017) and Mikhailov (2013). Turkey after Danişman & Koşar (2013), Iran after Tanasevitch (2009), Kazakhstan after this article. Song et al. (1999) mentioned the rocord in China. See Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Porrhomma microphthalmum ( O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 )
Růžička, Vlastimil 2018 |
P. meadii
F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1894 |
Opistoxys acuta
Simon 1884 |
incerta
O. Pickard-Cambridge 1878 |
Linyphia microphthalma
O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871 |
L. decens
O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871 |
Linyphia
Latreille 1804 |