Charax gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758),

Menezes, Naércio A. & de Lucena, Carlos Alberto S., 2014, A taxonomic review of the species of Charax Scopoli, 1777 (Teleostei: Characidae: Characinae) with description of a new species from the rio Negro bearing superficial neuromasts on body scales, Amazon basin, Brazil, Neotropical Ichthyology 12 (2), pp. 193-228: 204-206

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-20130175

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CFAB1CE-D283-483B-8C2B-87D95AEADE70

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5131747

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C4D938-3471-3F4F-FEF9-FDF9FEC86248

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Charax gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758)
status

 

Charax gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758) 

Figs. 11View Fig and 12

Salmo gibbosus Linnaeus, 1758: 311  [type locality: Suriname; Wheeler, 1989: 208 (type information)].

Characinus gibbosus, Lacépède, 1803: 269  (diagnosis).

Epicyrtus gibbosus, Müller & Troschel, 1844: 346  (America meridionali; listed).

Cynopotamus gibbosus, Valenciennes, 1850: 321  (Mana River; Essequibo River; Amazon). -Lucena & Menezes, 2003: 201 [synonym of Charax gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758)  ].

Charax gibbosus, Lucena, 1987: 36  (diagnosis; description; geographic variation). -Lucena, 1989: 104 (in key to species). -Lucena & Menezes, 2003: 201 (maximim length; distribution).

Charax gibbosa, Eigenmann, 1910: 444  (Guianas, Amazons and Paraguay; listed).

Diagnosis. Charax gibbosus  belongs in a species group having orbital diameter 30.1-38.4% of HL as opposed to C. caudimaculatus  and C. notulatus  that have an orbital diameter 25-28.5% of HL ( Fig. 4View Fig). Charax gibbosus  differs from C. condei  by having the lateral line complete (vs. incomplete). From C. and C. rupununi  which have the anal-fin origin anterior to the vertical through the dorsal-fin origin in having the anal-fin origin posterior to the dorsal-fin origin. Charax delimai  can be readily distinguished from C. tectifer  by the presence ( Fig. 1View Fig) (vs. absence, Fig. 26View Fig) of superficial neuromasts on the body with neuromasts dorso-vantrally arranged on trunk scales except the lateral line and from C. metae  by having fewer ectopterygoid teeth (13-15 vs. 20-50) more transverse scale rows between the humeral spot and the supracleithrum (10-12 vs. 7-9) and the humeral spot distance 48-51% of the SL vs. 41.6-47% of the SL scale rows around the caudal peduncle (17-18) than C. apurensis  and C. macrolepis  (20-21), from C. michaeli  by the number of scale rows from dorsal-fin origin to lateral line (15-16 vs. 18-20), from C. pauciradiatus  by having more scale rows from the dorsal-fin origin to the lateral line (15-16 vs. 13-14), from C. leticiae  by the humeral spot distance (34.7-37.5% of SL, vs. 38-44% of SL, the number of transverse scale rows between the humeral spot and the supracleithrum (5-6, vs. 8-10), and from C. niger  by the number of predorsal scales (38-45 vs. 52- 68) and the presence (vs. absence) of ectopterygoid teeth. Charax gibbosus  differs from C. hemigrammus  , C. condei  , and C. stenopterus  by having the lateral line complete (vs. lateral line incomplete), from C. rupununi  by the number of scales around the caudal peduncle (17-18 vs. 12) and from C. tectifer  , C. metae  , and C. delimai  by having the anal-fin origin always anterior to the vertical through the dorsal-fin origin (vs. anal-fin origin along vertical or slightly posterior to vertical through the dorsal-fin origin) and the ectopterygoid teeth absent (vs. ectopterygoid teeth present).

Description. Morphometrics of examined specimens presented in Table 5. Body elongate, moderately large (34- 125.5 mm SL), compressed and moderately deep; greatest body depth slightly in advance of dorsal-fin origin. Dorsal profile of head an body slightly convex on tip of snout, straight from posterior border of posterior nostril to vertical line through posterior border of pupil, slightly concave from that point to base of supraoccipital spine, strongly convex from that point to dorsal-fin origin, nearly straight along dorsal-fin base and from end of dorsal-fin base to caudal peduncle and slightly concave along caudal peduncle. Ventral profile of heaf and body convex from tip of lower jaw to anal-fin origin, nearly straight along anal-fin base and concave from end of anal-fin base to beginning of procurrent rays. Snout pointed. Lower jaw included in upper jaw when mouth closed. Maxilla extending slightly beyond vertical through posterior border of pupil.

Dorsal-fin rays ii, 9 in all specimens, posterior most ray unbranched. Adipose fin present. Unbranched anal-fin rays iv or v, usually iv, branched rays 45-56, 49.5. Single examined sexually mature male (MZUSP 10675, 64 mm SL) with tiny hooks on anterior anal-fin rays ( Fig. 12). Pectoral-fin rays i, 12-17, 14.8. Tips of longest pectoral-fin rays reaching to or slightly beyond middle of pelvic-fin length. Pelvic-fin rays i, 7, without hooks in single sexually mature male examined. Tips of longest pelvic-fin rays reaching to vertical between bases of third to sixth branched anal-fin rays. Principal caudalfin ray count 10/ 9 in all specimens.

Lateral line complete; perforated scales 50-62, 56. Horizontal scale rows from dorsal-fin origin to lateral line 15- 16, 15.4. Horizontal scale rows from pelvic-fin origin to lateral line 10-12, 10.8. Horizontal scale rows from anal-fin origin to lateral line 9-14, 11.8. Predorsal scales 38-45, 42. Scale rows around caudal peduncle 17-18, 17.8. One scale row anteriorly along anal-fin base, extending to about middle of base.

Premaxillary with one anterior canine-like tooth followed by set of smaller conical teeth and another canine-like tooth followed by one or two small conical teeth. Total number of premaxillary teeth 11-16, 13. Maxillary teeth conical, 43-75, 59.2, larger specimens in general with higher counts. Dentary with one canine-like tooth followed by 2-5, 4 conical teeth, another canine-like tooth and posterior row of 20-31, 25.3 conical teeth.

Vertebrae 34-35, 34.5 (4). Gill-rakers on lower limb of first gill-arch 9-11, 9.7. Branchiostegal rays 4; 3 rays originating from anterior ceratohyal and 1 from posterior ceratohyal.

Color in alcohol. Body pale to light yellow, slightly darker dorsally than on lateral and ventral parts. Ventral portions of body lighter with scattered dark chromatophores especially anteriorly. Irregularly shaped vertically elongate dark blotch at humeral region about 4 scales horizontally and 3 to 4 scales vertically. Dorsal portion of head, snout and tip of lower jaw darker than remainder of head, dark coloration extending to median portion of lower jaw, dorsal portions of fifth and sixth infraorbitals, between second and third infraorbitals in young specimens and dorsal part of opercle. Inconspicuous, dark midlateral stripe extending from posterior border of humeral blotch to caudal blotch. Darker V-shaped lines of chromatophores over miosepta present along lateral stripe. Inconspicuous diamond shaped dark blotch on caudal base, more conspicuous in young specimens; dark chromatophores extending over bases of middle caudal-fin rays.All fins hyaline with scattered dark chromatophores more visible on interradial membranes. Anterior portion of first and second unbranched rays of dorsal and first unbranched rays of pectoral- and pelvic-fin rays darker than remaining rays.

Distribution. This species is known from the Nickerie, Brokopondo, Afobaka, and Courentyne Districts in Suriname; Wismar and Botanical Garden in Guyana; and rio Surumu, a tributary of rio Branco, Brazil ( Fig. 7View Fig).

Sexual dimorphism. Females lack the anal-fin hooks present in males and seem to grow larger. The single examined fully mature male is only 64 mm SL whereas examined sexually mature females ranged from 75-124.5 mm SL.

206 Taxonomic review of Charax 

Specimens examined. Suriname: MZUSP 38226View Materials, 1View Materials, 84 mm SL  , Suriname, Corantyne River, Matappi Creek , approximately 4°07’N 57°28’WGoogleMaps  ; MZUSP 38240View Materials, 5View Materials, 34-57 mm SL  , Suriname, Nickerie District, Kapoeri Creek, about 4 km N of intersection with Corantyne River , approximately 4°12’N 57°55’WGoogleMaps  ; MZUSP 10679View Materials, 3View Materials, 93-111 mm SL  , Suriname, Zy Creek, not precisely located; MZUSP 10674View Materials, 3View Materials, 70-124.5 mm SL, Sara Creek, Brokopondo District, not precisely located; MZUSP 10675View Materials, 2View Materials, 37View Materials and 64 mm SL, Marowijne Creek, 50 kilometers south of Afobaka , not precisely located  . Brazil: MZUSP 5164View Materials, 1View Materials, 57 mm SL, Roraima, rio Surumu, tributary of rio Branco , 4°05’28"N 60°43’04"WGoogleMaps  .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Actinopterygii

Order

Characiformes

Family

Characidae

Genus

Charax

Loc

Charax gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Menezes, Naércio A. & de Lucena, Carlos Alberto S. 2014
2014
Loc

Charax gibbosus

, Lucena 1987: 36
1987
Loc

Charax gibbosa

Eigenmann 1910: 444
1910
Loc

Cynopotamus gibbosus

Valenciennes 1850: 321
1850
Loc

Epicyrtus gibbosus, Müller & Troschel, 1844: 346

Muller & Troschel 1844: 346
1844
Loc

Characinus gibbosus, Lacépède, 1803: 269

Lacepede 1803: 269
1803
Loc

Salmo gibbosus

Linnaeus 1758: 311
1758