Rhinolophus monoceros, Andersen, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3757451 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3806548 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487ED-FFD3-A86E-FDEA-F0F38037E9B8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhinolophus monoceros |
status |
sp. nov. |
22. Rhinolophus monoceros View in CoL View at ENA , sp. n.
Diagnosis. Subbadius -type. Larger: forearm, in a not fullgrown example, 38 ’ 2 mm.
Details. Connecting process (text-fig. 22 c, on p. 2) and lancet as in subbadius . Horse-shoe markedly broader. General size considerably larger. Tail proportionately longer.
The type, and only specimen known to me, is not full-grown (supraorbital crests still separated posteriorly; no saggital crest; metacarpals far from having acquired their full length). In the table p. 132 I give only those measurements which may be of some use for comparison with Rh. subbadius .
Dentition. p3 external. p2 and p4 in contact, p2 in row; cusp very minute.
Type. ♀ juv. (in alcohol). Baksa , Formosa; June 5th, 1893. Collected by Mr. P. A. Holst. Presented by Henry Seebohm, Esq. Brit. Mus. no. 94.2.4.1.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |