Urupelma pampas, Kaderka, Lüddecke, Rezac, Rezacova and Hüsser, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2023.2265621 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10491975 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287B5-2962-FF99-FDE8-FF15F184F90C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Urupelma pampas |
status |
sp. nov. |
Urupelma pampas sp. n.
( Figures 53–58 View Figure 53 View Figure 54 View Figure 55 View Figure 56 View Figure 57 View Figure 58 ; Tables 19 View Table 19 , 24 View Table 24 )
Types
Male holotype ( MUSM-ENT 0514012 , exuvia RKCP 0586 ) from Peru, Apurímac, between Ocros and Chincheros , 2431 m a .s .l ., 17 October 2018, R . Kaderka col.
Etymology
The specific name is derived from the type locality near the Pampas River , tributary of the Apurímac .
Diagnosis
Urupelma pampas sp. n. differs from U. ashaninka sp. n., U. johannae sp. n., U. atarraz sp. n. and U. megantonianum sp. n. in the absence of urticating setae of type IV (only type III are present).
The males of U. pampas sp. n. differs from all congeners in the presence of short and stout embolus with well-developed PI, developed R keel and weakly developed PS and SA keel ( Figure 57 View Figure 57 ). Two unequal subapical apophyses are present on male tibia I, basally fused, both with long spine. Palpal tibia retrolaterally with a cluster of short spiniform setae, the retrolateral process is absent. Males of U. pampas sp. n. differ from U. veronicae sp. n. and U. dianae sp. n. in having R keel developed and weakly developed TP in palpal bulb (weakly developed R keel and the presence of well-developed TP in palpal bulbs of U. veronicae sp. n. and U. dianae sp. n.).
Distribution and natural history
Known only from the type locality in Peru, Apurímac, between Ocros and Chincheros along Rio Pampas ( Figures 58 View Figure 58 , 76 View Figure 76 ) . The immature specimens from Ahuyaro near Chincheros were found in burrows under stones .
MALE (MUSM ENT 0514012): ( Figures 53 View Figure 53 , 55–57 View Figure 55 View Figure 56 View Figure 57 ) Total length: 14.61, carapace length 6.72, width 5.60, chelicerae with seven teeth on promargin. Anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: ( Figure 55C View Figure 55 ) AME 0.29 (circular), ALE 0.34 (oval), PME 0.24 (oval), PLE 0.29 (oval), AME-AME 0.15, AME-ALE 0.07, PME-PME 0.47, PME-PLE 0.03, ALE-PLE 0.08, AME-PME 0.04, OQ length 0.60, width 1.14. Ocular tubercle length 0.82, width 1.14, clypeus absent. Fovea transverse, straight, width 0.94, 4.28 from anterior edge of carapace. Labium length 0.94, width 1.17, anterior half with 60 cuspules, maxillae with 112–114 cuspules in basal half. Maxillae ventrally without short spiniform setae. Labiosternal sigilla joined. Sternum length 3.61, width 2.93, three pairs of sternal sigilla located near coxae III (length 0.32, 0.36 from edge of sternum), coxae II (length 0.19, 0.23 from edge of sternum) and coxae I (length 0.14, 0.14 from edge of sternum). Leg formula: IV> I> II> III. Incrassate leg segments: incrassate femur III. Maxillary and trochanteral stridulatory bristles absent.
Scopulae: All tarsi 100% densely scopulate, metatarsi I 60%, metatarsi II 50%, metatarsi III 30%, metatarsi IV 10% scopulate. Tarsal scopulae I and II divided by a longitudinal line of setae, tarsal scopulae III–IV divided by a longitudinal band of setae. Dorsal face of all tarsi and cymbium with two irregular longitudinal rows of very short claviform trichobothria. Denticulation of paired tarsal claws on right leg (prolateral/retrolateral row): I 2/3, II 1/2, III 2/2, IV 3/2 (indictinct teeth). Plumose setae on retrolateral face of femur IV absent.
Spination: femora I d 0-0-2, II d 0-1-2, III d 0-2-2, IV d 0-0-3 and femora of palps 0; patellae I 0, II 0, III p 0-0-1, IV 0 and patellae of palps 0; tibiae I v 3-1-2-1 (apical), p 0-1-1, II v 3-2-3 (apical), p 1-0-1, III v 2-2-2 (apical), p 1-1-0, r 1-1-0, IV v 3-2-3 (apical), p 1-0-1, r 1-0-1 and tibiae of palps p 1-2-1; metatarsi I v 0-0-1 (apical), p 1-0-0, II v 1-0-1, p 1-0-1, III p 2-2-3 (apical), p 1-1-1, r 0-1-1, IV v 2-2-1-3 (apical), p 1-1-1, r 1-0-1, tarsi I–IV and tarsi of palps 0.
Palpal organ as in Figure 57 View Figure 57 , embolus short and stout with four keels, PI, A, SA and R keel, PI keel is bipartite, its distal part represents subtriangular lobe. PS keel is almost undeveloped. Sperm pore is between PI and A keel. Tegulum with weakly developed basal protuberance. Cymbium dorsally and retrolaterally covered with short spiniform setae. Prolateral cymbial lobe larger than retrolateral one. Retrolateral face of palpal tibia with a cluster of short spiniform setae ( Figure 56A View Figure 56 ). Two unequal subapical apophyses are present on tibia I ( Figure 56B View Figure 56 ): a longer retrolateral tibial apophysis with apical spine, and a shorter prolateral tibial apophysis with single, retrolateral spine reaching the apex. Metatarsus I not sigmoidly curved and without basal or median protuberance on retrolateral face. When flexed, metatarsus I contacts the retrolateral side of retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Abdomen ( Figure 53 View Figure 53 ): urticating setae of type III are located in a central patch. Size of the patch: length 1.73, width 2.14. PLS: length 3.12, basal segment 1.56, middle segment 0.55, apical segment 1.01, all digitiform. PMS: 0.65.
Colouration and covering setae: dorsal view: ( Figure 53 View Figure 53 ) carapace, coxae and trochantera covered with reddish-brown pubescence, legs dark brown. Patellae I, II and palpal patella with two equal longitudinal stripes without covering setae, patellae III, IV with two unequal diagonal stripes without covering setae. Abdomen dark brown, covered with long reddish-brown setae, the central patch of urticating setae is reddish-brown. Ventral view: dark brown, except for ventral abdomen which is brown. Spinnerets brown.
FEMALE: unknown.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |