Urupelma atarraz, Kaderka, Lüddecke, Rezac, Rezacova and Hüsser, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2023.2265621 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10491966 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287B5-290D-FF8B-FDED-FA50F184FF73 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Urupelma atarraz |
status |
sp. nov. |
Urupelma atarraz sp. n.
( Figures 39–41 View Figure 39 View Figure 40 View Figure 41 , 79G View Figure 79 ; Tables 15 View Table 15 , 24 View Table 24 )
Types
Male holotype ( MUSM-ENT 0508428 ) from Peru, Pasco, Villa Rica, Quebrada Atarraz, 1598 m a .s .l., April 2015, Juan Grados col .
Etymology
The specific name refers to the type locality along the Quebrada Atarraz River in the Pasco Department, Peru .
Diagnosis
The males of U. atarraz sp. n. differ from all congeners, except for U. ashaninka sp. n., U. johannae sp. n. and U. megantonianum sp. n., in the presence of urticating setae of type IV (only type III setae are present in the other congeners).
The males of U. atarraz sp. n. differ from all congeners in the presence of short and stout embolus with well-developed PI and developed R keel, PS keel is absent ( Figure 41 View Figure 41 ). Two unequal subapical apophyses are present on male tibia I, basally fused, both with long spine. Palpal tibia retrolaterally with a cluster of short spiniform setae, the retrolateral process indistinct. Males of U. atarraz sp. n. differ from U. veronicae sp. n. and U. dianae sp. n. in having R keel developed and less developed TP in palpal bulb (weakly developed R keel and the presence of well-developed TP in palpal bulbs of U. veronicae sp. n. and U. dianae sp. n.). They differ from U. ashaninka sp. n. in the extension of urticating setae patch, more extended in U. atarraz sp. nov and less extended in U. ashaninka sp. n. ( Figures 39C View Figure 39 and 33F View Figure 33 ). They also differ from U. megantonianum sp. n. and U. sanctimariae sp. n. in the absence of SA keel in the palpal bulb morphology.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality ( Figure 76 View Figure 76 ).
MALE (MUSM-ENT 0508428): ( Figures 39–41 View Figure 39 View Figure 40 View Figure 41 ) Total length: 19.24, carapace length 9.47, width 7.69, chelicerae with 12 teeth on promargin. Anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: ( Figure 39D View Figure 39 ) AME 0.34 (circular), ALE 0.46 (oval), PME 0.31 (oval), PLE 0.36 (oval), AME-AME 0.15, AME-ALE 0.06, PME-PME 0.58, PME-PLE 0.10, ALE-PLE 0.10, AME-PME 0.07, OQ length 0.75, width 1.44. Ocular tubercle length 1.09, width 1.44, clypeus absent. Fovea transverse, slightly procurved, width 1.64, 6.00 from anterior edge of carapace. Labium length 1.23, width 1.88, anterior quarter with 24 cuspules, maxillae with 111–119 cuspules in basal half. Maxillae without spiniform setae. Sternum length 4.67, width 4.01, three pairs of sternal sigilla located near coxae III (length 0.35, 0.43 from edge of sternum), coxae II (length 0.25, 0.27 from edge of sternum) and coxae I (length 0.16, 0.21 from edge of sternum). Leg formula: IV> I> II> III. Incrassate leg segments: slightly incrassate femur III. Maxillary and trochanteral stridulatory bristles absent.
Scopulae: All tarsi 100% densely scopulate, metatarsi I 25%, metatarsi II 30%, metatarsi III 20%, metatarsi IV 10% scopulate. Tarsal scopulae I divided by a longitudinal line of setae, tarsal scopulae II–III divided by a narrow longitudinal band of setae, tarsal scopulae IV divided by a wide longitudinal band of setae. Dorsal face of all tarsi and cymbium with two irregular longitudinal rows of very short claviform trichobothria. Denticulation of paired tarsal claws on right leg (prolateral/retrolateral row): I 3/2, II 3/3, III 3/4, IV 2/3. Plumose setae on retrolateral face of femur IV absent.
Spination: femora I d 0-1-1, II d 0-1-2, III d 0-0-1, IV d 0-0-1 and femora of palps d 0-0-1; patellae I 0, II 0, III p 0-0-1, IV 0 and patellae of palps 0; tibiae I v 2-1-1 (apical), p 0-0-1, II v 3- 2-3 (apical), p 1-0-1, III v 2-1-3 (apical), p 2-0-2, r 1-0-1, IV v 3-2-2 (apical), p 1-0-1, r 0-0-1 and tibiae of palps p (0–1)-2-(0–1); metatarsi I v 1-1-2 (apical), p 0-1-0, II v 2-1-2 (apical), p 0-1-1, III v 3-2-3 (apical), p 1-1-1-1, r 0-1-2, IV v 3-2-4 (apical), p 1-1-1-1, r 0-1-1, tarsi I–IV and tarsi of palps 0.
Palpal organ as in Figure 41 View Figure 41 , embolus short and stout with three keels, triangular PI keel, transparent A keel and R keel, sperm pore is between PI and A keel. Tegulum with short basal apophysis. Retrolateral lobe of cymbium covered with short spiniform setae. Retrolateral face of palpal tibia with indistinct subapical protuberance covered with numerous spiniform setae ( Figure 40B View Figure 40 ). Two unequal subapical apophyses are present on tibia I ( Figure 40A View Figure 40 ): a longer retrolateral tibial apophysis with short apical spine, a shorter prolateral tibial apophysis with single, retrolateral spine reaching the apex. Metatarsus I not sigmoidly curved and without basal or median protuberance on retrolateral face. When flexed, metatarsus I contacts the retrolateral side of retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Abdomen ( Figure 39C View Figure 39 ): urticating setae of type III and IV, including setae of intermediate morphology, are located in a central patch. Size of the patch: length 5.80, width 5.40. PLS: length 3.44, basal segment 1.09, middle segment 0.91, apical segment 1.44, all digitiform. PMS: 0.81.
Colouration and covering setae: dorsal view: carapace and chelicerae brown, coxae, trochantera brown, femora black intermixed with long pale setae, patellae, tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi brown. Patellae I, II and palpal patella with two equal longitudinal stripes without covering setae, patellae III, IV with two unequal diagonal stripes without covering setae. Abdomen brown, except for central dark brown patch. Ventral view: laqbium, maxillae, coxae, sternum and trochantera brown, legs brown, abdomen yellowish brown. Spinnerets yellowish brown.
FEMALE: unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |