Isoperla burksi Frison, 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4757733 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08341F09-DD88-42DC-B6EA-6AC7D60C81D7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4765493 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C17C6B-FFD9-FFF5-B21D-430BFB3E359E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Isoperla burksi Frison, 1942 |
status |
|
Isoperla burksi Frison, 1942 View in CoL
Banded Stripetail
( Figs. 1‒6 View Figs )
http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera .speciesfile.org: TaxonName:468714
Isoperla burksi Frison, 1942:332 View in CoL .
Holotype ♂ ( INHS), Lusk Creek, Eddyville , Pope Co., Illinois
Isoperla burksi: Illies 1966:392 View in CoL , 397.
Isoperla burksi: Poulton & Stewart 1991:47 View in CoL .
Isoperla burksi: Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015:52 View in CoL .
Egg. General shape oblong, cross-section concave ( Figs. 1‒2 View Figs ), anterior and posterior poles broadly-rounded ( Figs. 2‒4 View Figs ). Color pale brown. Collar well-developed, with irregular longitudinal ridges, slightly flared apically ( Fig. 3 View Figs ). Follicle cell impressions near collar ranging from elongate to hexagonal ( Figs. 1, 3 View Figs ). Chorion covered mostly with irregular-shaped pentagonal or hexagonal follicle cell impressions with thickened elevated ridges ( Figs. 4‒6 View Figs ); floors with numerous shallow pits ( Fig. 5‒6 View Figs ). Eclosion line present ( Figs. 4‒6 View Figs ). Micropyles located along ridges near eclosion line in anterior ¼ ( Figs. 5‒6 View Figs ).
Material examined. Alabama, DeKalb Co., South Sauty Creek , 6 km N Rainsville, 34.5484, -85.8543, 7 May 2008, S.A. Grubbs, ♂, ♀ ( WKUC) GoogleMaps . Indiana, Jackson Co., Little Salt Creek , 7 km NNW Freetown, 39.0375, -86.1494, 25 May 2002, S.A. Grubbs, 2♀ ( WKUC) GoogleMaps . Kentucky, Edmonson Co., Bear Creek , 3 km NW Bee Spring, 37.3029, -86.3204, 6 May 2013, S.A. Grubbs, ♀ ( WKUC) GoogleMaps ; Green Co., Big Brush Creek, Bloyd , 37.4049, -85.5758, 27 April 2002, S.A. Grubbs, ♀ ( WKUC) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. USA: AL, AR, IL, IN, KY, MD, MO, NC, SC, NJ, OH, OK, SC, VA, WV ( DeWalt et al.
2016).
Diagnosis. Szczytko & Kondratieff (2015) placed this species in the I. burksi group with I. cotta Ricker, 1952 and I. orata Frison, 1942 . Egg characteristics uniting these species include a concave crosssection, well-developed collar, distinct ridges offsetting the cell impressions, and lack of an eclosion line ( Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015). Eggs of I. burksi from Indiana and Kentucky, however, possess a distinct eclosion line ( Figs. 4‒6 View Figs ) that easily distinguishes this species from I. cotta ( Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015, figs. 10.14, 10.18) and I. orata ( Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015, figs. 37.9, 37.12). Each of the other three characteristics listed above are exhibited by I. burksi .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Isoperlinae |
Genus |
Isoperla burksi Frison, 1942
Grubbs, Scott A. 2016 |
Isoperla burksi: Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015:52
Szczytko, S. W. & B. C. Kondratieff 2015: 52 |
Isoperla burksi:
Poulton, B. P. & K. W. Stewart 1991: 47 |
Isoperla burksi:
Illies, J. 1966: 392 |
Isoperla burksi
Frison, T. H. 1942: 332 |