Falconina crassipalpis ( Chickering, 1937 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A4E4E99C-0364-4759-81A2-6D570F899F5C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BFF854-C670-FFAE-DAE8-CA40FD2CFAA2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Falconina crassipalpis ( Chickering, 1937 ) |
status |
|
Falconina crassipalpis ( Chickering, 1937) View in CoL
Figs 19–21, 24
Corinna crassipalpis Chickering, 1937: 22 , figs 15, 21, 65, 66 (♁ holotype and ♀ allotype from Barro Colorado Island , Panama, deposited in MCZ [♁ 20925; ♀ 28235], both examined by photographs).
Corinna crassipalpis Chickering, 1973: 372 , fig. 17
Falconina crassipalpis Bonaldo, 2000: 78 View in CoL ; Alayón-García & de Armas, 2003: 12 (possible misidentification).
Note. This species was recorded from San Antonio de los Baños, Habana, Cuba by Alayón-García & Armas (2003). However, adult specimens from that country were not available for examination.Additional material examined ( IBSP 236874, IBSP 233839, IBSP 169764, IBSP 237079, IBSP 236886, IBSP 236893, IBSP 236867, IBSP 233815) from different Cuban localities were identified as F. gracilis . The record of F. crassipalpis from Cuba is thus possibly a misidentification.
Diagnosis. Males of Falconina crassipalpis resemble those of F. adriki sp. nov. by the RTA composed of only two lobes, the dorsal one being absent, and by the laminar, sculptured tegular process. They differ by the presence of a dorsal process on the ventral lobe of the RTA and by the sub-rectangular tegular process, with a basal membranous sector ( Figs 19A–B, 20A–B, 21A–B). Females resemble those of F. andresi sp. nov., F. gracilis , and F. albomaculosa by the M-shaped median notch of the posterior margin of the epigynal plate ( Figs 20C, 21C). They differ by the margins of posterior vulvar plate oval, as wide as the margins of the epigynal plate (in ventral view), and dorsally, by the posterior vulvar plate with the anterior margin projected laterally ( Fig. 21D).
Description. Male (MCZ): Carapace dark brown, smooth, with granulation laterally. Chelicerae and labium dark brown. Endites yellowish-brown. Sternum yellowish-brown. Legs dark yellowish. Abdomen elongated, with two strong stripes. Scutum greyish-brown. Total length 5.659. Carapace 2.661 long, 2.224 wide. Clypeus height 0.133. Eye diameters:AME 0.138, ALE 0.113, PME 0.097, PLE 0.107. Interocular distances:AME-AME 0.113, AME-ALE 0.047, PME-PME 0.214, PME-PLE 0.162, ALE-PLE 0.036, PME-AME 0.096. Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth, the second two times longer, and five retromarginal teeth, the most proximal to fang three times smaller than others. Sternum 0.965 long, 0.901 wide. Leg measurements: I—2.021, 0.618, 2.098, 1.660, 1.462, 9.859; II—1.944, 0.701, 1.670, 1.469, 1.307, 7.091; III—1.944, 0.704, 1.670, 1.469, 0.888, 6.675; IV—2.061, 0.799, 1.913, 2.360, 1.104, 8.237. Abdomen 2.216 long, 1.198 wide. Leg spination: I—femur d 0-0-2; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 1-1-0; tibia d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-2-2-2; metatarsus d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-2; II—femur d 0-0-2; p 0-0-0; r 0- 0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-2-2-2; metatarsus d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-2; III—femur d 0-0-2; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 2-0-2; p 1-0-0; r 1-0-0; v 2-2-2; metatarsus d 2-2-0; p 0-0-0; r 1-0-1; v 2-2-2; IV—femur d 1-0-2; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 2-2-0; p 1-1-0; r 1-0-1; v 2-2-2; metatarsus d 2-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 1-0-0; v 2-2-2. Male palp. Tibia almost half of cymbium length. Two lobes. Ventral lobe pronounced, with long, thin apical spur, longer than median and dorsal lobes ( Figs 19A, 20A, 21A). Dorsal process of ventral lobe composed of small triangular projection ( Fig. 20B). Median lobe very long, with concave prolateral surface ( Figs 19B, 21B). Dorsal lobe absent. Cymbium with retrolateral basal process sub-squared, covered by median lobe in retrolateral view. Spermophore with three ventral folds. Embolus comma-shaped. Tegular process sub-rectangular, with rounded apex and ragged edges ( Fig. 20C), inserted on membranous base. Embolar process small, short, with retrolateral projection ending before conductor. Conductor and embolus curved, overlapping tegular process ( Fig. 20D).
Female (MCZ): Color as in male. Total length 5.609. Carapace 2.152 long, 1.501 wide. Clypeus height 0.126. Eye diameters:AME 0.141, ALE 0.079, PME 0.105, PLE 0.097. Interocular distances:AME-AME 0.063,AME-ALE 0.052, PME-PME 0.120, PME-PLE 0.065, ALE-PLE 0.037, PME-AME 0.054. Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth, the second two times longer, and five small retromarginal teeth, the most proximal to fang three times smaller than others. Sternum 1.076 long, 0.959 wide. Leg measurements: I—both absent; II—1.415, 0.435, 1.200, 1.027, 1.114, 5.191; III—1.309, 0.396, 1.062, 1.201, 0.854, 4.822; IV—1.746, 0.584, 1.547, 1.751, 0.891, 6.519. Abdomen 3.168 long, 1.965 wide. Leg spination: II—femur d 0-1-0; p 0-0-1; r 0-0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-2-2-2; metatarsus d 0-0-0; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 2-2-0; III—femur d 1-1-2; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 2-2- 2; p 0-1-1; r 1-0-0; v 2-2-2-2; metatarsus d 2-0-2; p 0-1-0; r 1-0-0; v 2-2-0; IV—femur d 1-1-2; p 0-0-0; r 0-0-0; v 0-0-0; tibia d 2-0-2; p 1-0-0; r 1-0-1; v 2-2-2; metatarsus d 2-2-2; p 1-1-0; r 1-0-1; v 2-2-2. Epigyne. Epigynal plate oval; copulatory opening positioned near posterior margin of epigynal plate; posterior margin of epigynal plate with M-shaped median notch ( Figs 19C, 21C); dorsally, vulva with well-developed posterior vulvar plate, trapezoid, with anterior margin projected laterally; fertilization ducts short, secondary spermathecae placed anteriorly in relation to primary spermathecae ( Fig. 21D).
Variation. Lengths: 1 (♁) total 4.048. Carapace 1.833 long, 1.334 wide. Leg I—1.409, 0.412, 1.424, 1.011, 1.103, 5.359; 1 (♀) Total length 5.214. Carapace 2.214 long, 1.717 wide. Leg I—1.561, 0.778, 1.466, 1.001, 1.439, 6.245.
Additional material examined. PANAMÁ: Colón: Barro Colorado Island [N9.15379°, W79.84642°, 44 m], A.M. Chickering leg., VI.1939, 1 ♁ 1 ♀ ( MCZ) GoogleMaps .
Distribution: Known from Panama ( Fig. 24).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Falconina crassipalpis ( Chickering, 1937 )
García, Fabián & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2023 |
Falconina crassipalpis
Alayon-Garcia, G. & de Armas, L. F. 2003: 12 |
Bonaldo, A. B. 2000: 78 |
Corinna crassipalpis
Chickering, A. M. 1973: 372 |
Corinna crassipalpis
Chickering, A. M. 1937: 22 |