Drouetiella hepatica Mai, Johansen et Pietrasiak, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.365.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13704882 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BFDE64-6C4E-FFA5-009A-FBC6FF4BFC8B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Drouetiella hepatica Mai, Johansen et Pietrasiak |
status |
sp. nov. |
Drouetiella hepatica Mai, Johansen et Pietrasiak sp. nov.
Diagnosis: ―Distinguished from the other species of the genus by its meristematic zones and false branching, and by its wide variability in trichome width.
Description:— Colony brownish or purplish-brown, forming floating, mucilaginous mats in liquid culture. Filaments long or short. Mature filaments 2.8–3.7 μm wide ( Figs. 16a, g–h View FIGURE 16 ), young filaments narrower, 2.3–2.8 μm wide ( Figs. 16b–f View FIGURE 16 ), occasionally with false branching ( Fig. 16a–b View FIGURE 16 ). Sheath firm, colorless, thin to occasionally enlarged ( Figs. 16c–e View FIGURE 16 ) and lamellate ( Fig. 16e View FIGURE 16 ), up to 4.4 μm wide. Trichomes not or slightly constricted at cross-walls, cylindrical, with compacted coils at meristematic zones ( Figs. 16a,g View FIGURE 16 ), 1.5–2.1 μm wide in young trichomes and 1.7–3.0 μm wide in mature trichomes. Hormogonia absent. Cells longer than wide and occasionally elongated, (2.2) 3.1–4.5 μm long, or in meristematic regions isodiametric, 2.0–2.6 μm long, with one central granule present in both young and mature cells. Necridia present ( Fig. 16h View FIGURE 16 ). End cells cylindrical, rounded.
D1-D1’ helix 64 nucleotides long, with 3’ unilateral bulge of 7 nucleotides (5’-CAUCCCA-3’). Mid-helix region with a mismatch at position 24/34–35 immediately separated from the terminal loop by a 5’-GC:GC-3’ clamp, and two mismatches at position 9 (C/U) and 21 (G/A) on the 5’ strand. Terminal loop having sequence 5’-AAUCA-3’ ( Fig. 6f View FIGURE 6 ). Box B helix 34 nucleotides long, with one basal internal loop at position 5/29–30 and one unpaired adenine residue at position 9 of the 5’ strand ( Fig. 7e View FIGURE 7 ). V2 helix 21 nucleotides long, with terminal loop having sequence 5’-AAUAU-3’ ( Fig. 8c View FIGURE 8 ). V3 helix 51 nucleotides long, with one large internal loop at position 10–12/39–41 and one unpaired guanine residue at position 46 on 3’ strand. Terminal loop sequence 5’-UUAG-3’ ( Fig. 9f View FIGURE 9 ).
Etymology:— hepaticus (L.): of or pertaining to the liver, in reference to the dark reddish brown (liver-colored) color of the colonies.
Type locality: ― Slovakia. National Park Slovak Paradise: Waterfall Kaskady, gorge Sucha Bela, collected in 2000 by Bohuslav Uher. Found on subaerial limestone.
Holotype here designated:— BRY37778 About BRY !, Herbarium for Nonvascular Cryptogams, Monte L. Bean Museum, Provo, Utah.
Reference strain: ― UHER 2000/2452, Algal Culture Collection at John Carroll University, Cleveland, USA.
Taxonomic notes:— The characteristic coloration of the trichomes is similar to Leptolyngbya cebennensis ( Gomont 1899: 38) Umezaki & Watanabe (1994: 203) , L. carnea (Kützing ex Lemmermann 1910: 206) Anagnostidis & Komárek (1988: 391) and Lyngbya roseola Richter ex Hansgirg (1892: 491) . Trichomes and cell dimensions fit well with Leptolyngbya cebennensis and Lyngbya roseola , although the characteristic of heterogeneity in width of young and mature trichomes as well as the absence of pseudobranches separate D. hepatica from these taxa. L. carnea has granulated cell contents, tortuous trichomes and irregular sheath outlines that match filaments of D. hepatica . However, D. hepatica has wider trichomes, and brownish rather than pinkish coloration. No lamellate sheath was reported in any of the above species.
D. hepatica is distinct from the other named Drouetiella species based on percent dissimilarity of the ITS region, which is>18% ( Table 10). This very well satisfies the criterion for species distinction based on percent dissimilarity of>4.0% ( Erwin & Thacker 2008, Osorio-Santos et al. 2014, Pietrasiak et al. 2014, Bohunická et al. 2015). The closest taxon to D. hepatica is a strain that was named Leptolyngbya frigida ANT.LH 52.2 by the researchers that found it and subsequently reported on it ( Taton et al. 2006, Sabbe et al. 2004). ANT.LH52.2 has high 16S rRNA gene similarity to D. hepatica (99.5% identity), but dissimilarity in the ITS regions between two taxa is well above the 4% level used as evidence of conspecificity. Both taxa have identical domain lengths in the ITS region ( Table 6). The most striking similarity between the two taxa is the near complete similarity of secondary structure of the conserved ITS domains ( Figs. 6–9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 ). We do not know the morphology of ANT LH52.2, so a decision as to whether or not to consider it conspecific with D. hepatica must be postponed until more information is available, but the evidence that this strain and associated sequence belong to Drouetiella is unequivocable. It is discussed further under Antarctic Drouetiella sp. above.
ANT |
Anguilla National Trust |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |