Cybaeina dixoni Bennett, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:161E8842-5DB1-40CA-A4B7-2287462D86E1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8158333 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87AB-E42C-0711-09BE-F1466194FC00 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeina dixoni Bennett |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cybaeina dixoni Bennett spec. nov.
Figs 5 View FIGURES 3–7 , 10–11 View FIGURES 8–13 , 14–15 View FIGURES 14–18 , 25–28 View FIGURES 22–27 View FIGURE 28
Type material. U.S.A.: Oregon: Holotype male. Curry County, two miles north of Brookings , 31(sic). ix.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) . Paratypes. Curry , 4♀, 2 mi. N of Brookings, 31(sic). ix.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 1♀, Carpenterville , 31(sic). ix.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; Jackson, 1♀, Ashland Watershed , 15.vi.1998, R.W. Peck et al. ( RBCM) .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym honouring the late blues and jazz lyricist and bassist William (Willie) James Dixon.
Diagnosis. Distinguishing specimens of C. dixoni spec. nov. from those of C. confusa is discussed in the diagnosis of the latter. Pedipalpal characters distinguish males of C. dixoni spec. nov. from those of C. minuta : in C. dixoni spec. nov. ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 8–13 , 14–15 View FIGURES 14–18 ) the patellar apophysis is broad in retrolateral view with nine peg setae aligned dorsoventrally and the medial component of the retrolateral tibial apophysis is a distinct ledge with a small, slender, acuminate distal tip; in C. minuta ( Figs 12–13 View FIGURES 8–13 , 16–17 View FIGURES 14–18 ) the patellar apophysis is very small and tipped with two peg setae while the medial component of the retrolateral tibial apophysis is a simple stout, acuminate process. Females of C. dixoni spec. nov. and C. minuta are distinguished by vulval characters: in C. dixoni spec. nov. ( Figs 26–27 View FIGURES 22–27 ) the copulatory ducts loop once around the spermathecal stalks and Bennett’s glands are prominently visible in dorsal view; in C. minuta ( Figs 23–24 View FIGURES 22–27 ) the copulatory ducts loop about 2.5 times around the spermathecal stalks and Bennett’s glands are inconspicuous, obscured by the posterior loops of the copulatory ducts and spermathecal stalks.
Description. As in diagnosis and description of the genus and the diagnoses of C. confusa and this species. Additional descriptive characters presented here.
Male: (n=1). Patellar apophysis short and stout in retrolateral view ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 8–13 , 14 View FIGURES 14–18 ). Tegular apophysis ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ) with distal arm long (about twice as long as width at base), distad, tapered; proximal arm with elongate, acuminate prolatero-ventrad tip.
Measurements (n=1). Holotype CL 2.00, CW 1.73, SL 1.07, SW 1.05.
Female: (n=6). Atrium ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–27 ) positioned medially on epigyne. Vulva ( Figs 26–27 View FIGURES 22–27 ) with copulatory ducts contiguous at atrium then diverging prior to looping around spermathecal stalks; heads of spermathecae continuous with rest of vulva, primary pores on prolateral surface of heads; spermathecal stalks elongate, well sclerotized, twisted within loops of copulatory ducts; Bennett’s glands prominent near junction with relatively large, rounded spermathecal bases (about 1/2 length of vulva); fertilization ducts broad basally.
Measurements (n=5). CL 1.93–2.08 (2.02), CW 1.50–1.60 (1.56), SL 1.04–1.14 (1.08), SW 0.99–1.04 (1.01).
Distribution and natural history. ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ). Cybaeina dixoni spec. nov. is rarely encountered in, and apparently restricted to, a small area of southwestern Oregon, U.S.A. where it has been recorded from Curry and Jackson Counties. All but one of the specimens were collected in 1959. A single specimen was recorded in 1998. One female was collected in June; the other specimens were collected in late September and early October.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.