Rothaeina Bennett, 2023

Bennett, Robb, Copley, Claudia & Copley, Darren, 2023, Revision of the western Nearctic spider genus Cybaeina including the description of Neocybaeina gen. nov. and Rothaeina gen. nov. (Araneae: Cybaeidae: Cybaeinae), Zootaxa 5318 (1), pp. 97-129 : 111-114

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.1.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:161E8842-5DB1-40CA-A4B7-2287462D86E1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8169894

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87AB-E427-0706-09BE-F24A60B4F844

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rothaeina Bennett
status

gen. nov.

Rothaeina Bennett gen. nov.

Cybaeina View in CoL View at ENA (in part) Roth 1952: 197, figs 2, 4–5. Roth and Brown 1986: 2. World Spider Catalog 2023.

“New genus #1” Bennett 2005: 88, figs 22.11, 22.35–22.36, 22.38, 22.40–22.43. Bennett 2017: 99, figs 23.11, 23.35–22.36, 23.38, 23.40–22.43.

Type species. Cybaeina sequoia Roth 1952 View in CoL .

Etymology. The genus name, feminine in gender, is a contraction of “Vincent Roth’s Cybaeina ” and, with affection, honours Vince’s lifelong interest in Nearctic Cybaeinae spiders.

Diagnosis. Females of Rothaeina gen. nov. are readily distinguished from other Cybaeinae with conspicuous paired, elongate, usually overlapping ventral tibia I macrosetae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ) by their elongate, convoluted spermathecae with heads, stalks, and bases slender and of similar diameter ( Figs 67–69 View FIGURES 66–69 , 71–74 View FIGURES 70–74 , 76–79 View FIGURES 75–79 , 81–83 View FIGURES 80–83 ); the males of Rothaeina gen. nov., however, are difficult to distinguish from those of Cybaeina and Neocybaeina gen. nov. See the discussion presented in the genus diagnoses of Cybaeina and Neocybaeina gen. nov. In addition, the small proximal basal projection on the tegular apophysis of the male genital bulb ( Figs 43, 48, 50 View FIGURES 43–52 ) is diagnostic for three of the four species of Rothaeina gen. nov. with known males (tegular basal projection lacking in R. mackinleyi spec. nov.: Fig. 45 View FIGURES 43–52 ).

Description. As for Cybaeus and in diagnoses in this paper of this genus, Cybaeina , and Neocybaeina gen. nov. Additional descriptive characters presented here. Small- to medium-sized spiders, carapace lengths averaging 1.96–2.33 mm (males) and 1.93–2.26 mm (females); females usually slightly smaller than males. Legs pale yellow to light reddish brown, unmarked. Usually five complete pairs of conspicuous elongate ventral tibia I macrosetae: pattern usually 2(+1p)-2-1p-2-2-2-0 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ).Abdomen pale to gray with or without markings. Colulus a low swelling marked by two clumps of very few setae.

Male: Patellar apophysis ( Figs 53–59 View FIGURES 53–59 , 62, 64–65 View FIGURES 60–65 ) variable, species diagnostic, with usually four or fewer peg setae. Retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Figs 53–54, 56–59 View FIGURES 53–59 , 61 View FIGURES 60–65 ) bipartite with variable distal and medial components, either may be species diagnostic depending on species; distal component nearly as long as tibia. Genital bulb ( Figs 43–51 View FIGURES 43–52 ) with simple elongate, thin embolus; tegular apophysis well developed with distal arm large, somewhat species diagnostic and proximal arm variable, often species diagnostic.

Female: Epigyne ( Figs 66 View FIGURES 66–69 , 70 View FIGURES 70–74 , 75 View FIGURES 75–79 , 80 View FIGURES 80–83 ) with single medial or anteromedial, transverse, usually inconspicuous atrium (except usually prominent in R. beaudini spec. nov.: Fig. 66 View FIGURES 66–69 ). Vulva ( Figs 67–69 View FIGURES 66–69 , 71–74 View FIGURES 70–74 , 76–79 View FIGURES 75–79 , 81–83 View FIGURES 80–83 ) with copulatory ducts very short, heavily sclerotized, proceeding anteriorly from atrium, separate or contiguous at atrium, readily visible ventrally through integument of uncleared epigynes as two darkened areas at lateral edges of atrium; spermathecal heads close to anterior margin of atrium; Bennett’s glands usually inconspicuous, obscured by loops of spermathecal ducts; fertilization ducts attached posteriorly to spermathecal bases.

Composition and distribution. ( Figs 85–86 View FIGURES 84–86 ). The species of Rothaeina gen. nov. have restricted ranges within an area encompassing southwestern Oregon south to San Mateo County and Yosemite National Park in, respectively, central western and eastern California. We recognize five species: R. beaudini spec. nov. (females only), R. jamesi spec. nov., R. mackinleyi spec. nov., R. petersoni spec. nov., and R. sequoia comb. nov. The latter two species are relatively common within their distributions; the other three species are rarely recorded.

Key to the species of Rothaeina gen. nov.

(male of R. beaudini spec. nov. unknown)

1. Males.............................................................................................. 2

- Females. (Intraspecific variability and interspecific similarity of female Rothaeina gen. nov. renders specimens often difficult to identify with confidence; use the female key couplets with caution.)........................................... 5

2(1). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis with dorsal keel, usually acuminate in ventral view ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 43–52 ), acuminate or somewhat blunt in retrolateral view ( Figs 46 View FIGURES 43–52 , 63 View FIGURES 60–65 ), obscured in ventro-retrolateral view ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 43–52 ); distal component of retrolateral tibial apophysis extended distally over base of cymbium ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 53–59 )..................................... mackinleyi Bennett spec. nov.

- Tegular apophysis and retrolateral tibial apophysis otherwise................................................... 3

3(2). Patellar apophysis ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 53–59 ) distad with prominent basal “shoulder”........................ sequoia (Roth) View in CoL comb. nov.

- Patellar apophysis ( Figs 53, 56–57 View FIGURES 53–59 , 62, 64–65 View FIGURES 60–65 ) dorsad with “shoulder” absent or not prominent....................... 4

4(3). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis ( Figs 48–49 View FIGURES 43–52 ) slender, smoothly curved, with tip acuminate in ventral view.......................................................................................... petersoni Bennett spec. nov.

- Proximal arm of tegular apophysis ( Figs 43–44 View FIGURES 43–52 , 60 View FIGURES 60–65 ) bulky, angular, slightly twisted, with tip blunt in ventral view........................................................................................ jamesi Bennett spec. nov.

5(1). Posterior ducts of spermathecae visible ventrally through uncleared epigyne as pair of distinct ring-like structures ( Figs 75 View FIGURES 75–79 , 80 View FIGURES 80–83 ); vulva broad, width usually 4–5 times atrial height (measured from epigastric groove to middle of atrium) ( Figs 76–79 View FIGURES 75–79 , 81–83 View FIGURES 80–83 ) ................................................................................................... 6

- Posterior ducts of spermathecae usually not visible through uncleared epigyne as pair of rings ( Figs 66 View FIGURES 66–69 , 70 View FIGURES 70–74 ); vulva less broad, width usually less than 3.5 times atrial height ( Figs 67–69 View FIGURES 66–69 , 71–74 View FIGURES 70–74 ).............................................. 7

6(5). Posterior spermathecal duct rings relatively large and open ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 80–83 ); copulatory ducts usually contiguous at atrium ( Figs 81–83 View FIGURES 80–83 )......................................................................... sequoia (Roth) View in CoL comb. nov.

- Posterior spermathecal duct rings relatively small and tight ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 75–79 ); copulatory ducts usually separated at atrium ( Figs 76– 79 View FIGURES 75–79 )........................................................................... petersoni Bennett spec. nov.

7(5). Atrium ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 66–69 ) usually prominent, U-shaped; vulva ( Figs 67–68 View FIGURES 66–69 ) with medial transverse section of spermathecal ducts a minor inconspicuous feature in dorsal view............................................ beaudini Bennett spec. nov.

- Atrium ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 70–74 ) usually indistinct, linear; vulva ( Figs 72, 74 View FIGURES 70–74 ) with medial transverse section of spermathecal ducts a prominent conspicuous feature in dorsal view........................................................................ 8

8(7). Spermathecal ducts with an additional loop posteriorly near fertilization duct ( Fig. 72 View FIGURES 70–74 ).......... jamesi Bennett spec. nov.

- Spermathecal ducts lacking additional loop posteriorly ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 70–74 )......................... mackinleyi Bennett spec. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Cybaeidae

Loc

Rothaeina Bennett

Bennett, Robb, Copley, Claudia & Copley, Darren 2023
2023
Loc

Cybaeina

Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. 1986: 2
Roth, V. D. 1952: 197
1952
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF