Neocybaeina xantha (Chamberlin and Ivie) Bennett & Copley & Copley, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:161E8842-5DB1-40CA-A4B7-2287462D86E1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8169892 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87AB-E424-0719-09BE-F1546039FB20 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neocybaeina xantha (Chamberlin and Ivie) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Neocybaeina xantha (Chamberlin and Ivie) comb. nov.
Figs 18 View FIGURES 14–18 , 29–39 View FIGURES 29–35 View FIGURES 36–42 , 84 View FIGURES 84–86
Cybaeina xantha Chamberlin and Ivie 1937: 225 View in CoL , fig. 65. Roewer 1954: 87. Bonnet 1956: 1296. Roth and Brown 1986: 2. World Spider Catalog 2023.
“New genus #2” Bennett 2005: 88, figs 22.37, 22.39, 22.44; Bennett 2017: 99, figs 23.37, 23.39, 22.44.
Type material examined. U.S.A.: Oregon: Holotype female. Douglas County, Comstock [approximately 32 miles south of Eugene], 9.ix.1935, R.V. Chamberlin & W. Ivie ( AMNH). Note: Epigyne and vulva of holotype have been lost.
Other material examined. U.S.A.: Oregon: Coos, 1♁, Charleston , 9.viii.1941, B. Malkin ( AMNH) ; 1♁, Camp Myrtlewood , S of Bridge, 28.vii.1954, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 5♁ 1♀, Camp Myrtlewood , S of Bridge, 27.vii/4. viii.1954, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 1♀, 3 mi. N of Bandon , 30.ix.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; Douglas , 1♁, Bogus Creek, E of Glide, 23.vii.1962, V.D. Roth ( CAS); 2♀, Comstock , 7.i.1950, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 1♀, 9 mi. SW of Cottage Grove , 23.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; 2♀, Idleyld Park , North Umpqua R., 23.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; 3♀, 27 mi. E of Roseburg , 26.viii.1955, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 7♀, 32 mi. E of Roseburg, Bogus Creek Forest Camp , 13.ix.1955, V.D. Roth & Capizzi ( CAS) ; 4♁, Susan Creek , E of Glide, 23.vii.1962, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; Lane , 1♀, Oakridge , vi.1952, S. Mulaik & D. Mulaik ( AMNH) ; 1♁, 7 mi. S of Cottage Grove , 1/ 15. vii.1953, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 1♁ 1♀, 9 mi. S of Cottage Grove , 24.vii.1962, V.D. Roth ( CAS) .
Diagnosis. Distinguishing the male of N. xantha comb. nov. is discussed in the genus diagnosis. Distinguishing the female of N. xantha comb. nov. from that of N. burnetti spec. nov. is discussed in the diagnosis of N. burnetti spec. nov.
Description. As in diagnosis and description of the genus and the diagnosis of N. burnetti spec. nov. Additional descriptive characters presented here. Abdomen usually patterned (holotype unmarked), legs unbanded.
Male: (n=14). Patellar apophysis ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 14–18 , 31–34 View FIGURES 29–35 ) elongate, curved dorsally, with tapered tip bearing three to six peg setae. Retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Figs 31–35 View FIGURES 29–35 ) with medial component present but greatly reduced, usually represented by a single short stout basally articulated seta (or, occasionally, a rigid spine-like process) situated distal to dorsal row of tibial trichobothria ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 29–35 ), rarely such a seta or process absent; distal component of retrolateral tibial apophysis nearly as long as tibia, somewhat swollen anterolaterally. Genital bulb ( Fig. 29–30 View FIGURES 29–35 ) with embolus moderately long, thin; proximal arm of tegular apophysis laterally flattened with short, acuminate tip.
Measurements (n=12). CL 1.78–2.18 (1.96+0.13), CW 1.33–1.70 (1.47+0.11), SL 1.00–1.17 (1.10+0.06), SW 0.94–1.07 (1.01+0.04).
Female: (n=20). Atrium ( Figs 36, 38–39 View FIGURES 36–42 ) anteriorly located on epigyne, inconspicuous (barely discernible in uncleared epigynes). Vulva ( Figs 37–39 View FIGURES 36–42 ) with copulatory ducts separated; spermathecal heads at anterior margin of spermathecae, undifferentiated from spermathecal stalks; stalks short; Bennett’s glands large, conspicuous; spermathecal bases usually visible through epigynal integument ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 36–42 ), large, bulbous, rounded with short, slightly constricted anterior region adjacent to Bennett’s glands gradually expanding into posterior bulbous region; fertilization ducts attached to ventral surface of posterior region of bases.
Measurements (n=15). CL 1.55–1.95 (1.73+0.11), CW 1.10–1.33 (1.27+0.10), SL 0.91–1.04 (0.96+0.05), SW 0.81–0.94 (0.86+0.04). Holotype CL 1.58, CW 1.20, SL 0.91, SW 0.81.
Distribution and natural history. ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 84–86 ). Neocybaeina xantha comb. nov. is known only from Coos, Douglas, and Lane Counties of western Oregon, U.S.A. where it has been recorded from the southern upland reaches of the Willamette Valley to the southwestern slopes of the coastal mountains. Males have been collected from July to early August. This species was most recently recorded in 1962 and its conservation status is unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neocybaeina xantha (Chamberlin and Ivie)
Bennett, Robb, Copley, Claudia & Copley, Darren 2023 |
Cybaeina xantha
Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. 1986: 2 |
Bonnet, P. 1956: 1296 |
Roewer, C. F. 1954: 87 |
Chamberlin, R. V. & Ivie, W. 1937: 225 |