Geothelphusa boreas, Shy & Shih & Mao, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5060.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B96324E4-5651-472F-A443-31D9CF7109E2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5608361 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6DC2B082-D052-49B3-B243-941D38306477 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:6DC2B082-D052-49B3-B243-941D38306477 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Geothelphusa boreas |
status |
sp. nov. |
Geothelphusa boreas View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 4–5 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6DC2B082-D052-49B3-B243-941D38306477
Geothelphusa sp. 1 . — Shih et al. 2011: 461.
Material examined. Holotype: 1 ♂ (21.2 × 16.4 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13615), Hapen River, head branch of Danshuei (= Tansui) River, the Fushan Botanical Garden area , New Taipei City (24°45’30”N; 121°34’35”E), elevation of 740 m, coll. H.-T. Shih, 16 Feb. 1994 GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 3 ♂♂ (15.7 × 12.4–19.0 × 14.7 mm), 2 ♀♀ (15.3 × 12.1, 17.1 × 13.1 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13429), 1 ♂ (16.2 × 13.2 mm) ( ZRC 2021.0648 View Materials ); same data as holotype. Others GoogleMaps : 7 ♂♂ (11.4 × 9.2–15.3 × 12.2 mm), 1 ♀ (16.6 × 12.9 mm) (NCHUZOOL 13616), Dakeng Bridge, Suao , Yilan (24°31’48.3”N; 121°51’13.0”E), elevation of 280 m, coll. Y.-H. Wang et al., 8 Sep. 2010 GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀ (15.1 × 10.9, 16.7 × 12.8 mm) (NCHUZOOL 16436), around the lake of Shenmihu, Nan-ao , Yilan (24°22'43.9"N; 121°44'58.7"E), elevation of 1100 m, coll. J.-J. Mao, 10 Mar. 2018 GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ (12.7 × 9.7 mm), 1 ♀ (13.9 × 10.5 mm) (NCHUZOOL 14998), 1 ♀ (13.5 × 10.3 mm) ( ZRC 2021.0649 View Materials ), Tongshan, Nan-ao , Yilan (24°30'15.5"N; 121°37'41.8"E – 24°30'03.5"N; 121°38'10.2"E), elevation of 1735–1880 m, coll. J.-J. Mao, 26 Sep. 2009 GoogleMaps .
Comparative material. Geothelphusa takuan Shy, Ng & Yu, 1994 : see “Material examined” under Geothelphusa takuan ; Geothelphusa tali Shy, Ng & Yu, 1994: 1 holotype male ( NTOU F10187), Dali (= Tali), Yilan Co., Taiwan, coll. J.-Y. Shy & W.-L. Tsay, 4 Apr. 1993.
Diagnosis. Carapace length, width 1.7-, 2.3-times carapace height, respectively. Anterolateral margins distinct, lined with inconspicuous granules, without epibranchial tooth. Subterminal segment of G1 ( Fig. 3A–C View FIGURE 3 ) curving inwards, outer proximal margin without tooth; terminal segment slightly curving outwards to almost straight; total length of G1 5.8 times terminal segment.
Description. Carapace ( Fig. 2A, B View FIGURE 2 ) swollen longitudinally, transversely; dorsal surface smooth, glabrous, with fine pits. Carapace length, width 1.7-, 2.3-times carapace height, respectively. Frontal margin slightly dived into 2 lobes, without tooth. Postorbital cristae distinct, supraorbital margin smooth, without granules; infraorbital margin smooth to almost smooth, lined with inconspicuous granules. External orbital angles stout, external orbital regions concave. Anterolateral margins distinct, lined with inconspicuous granules, without epibranchial tooth. Postorbital cristae faint, smooth. Gastric, cardiac, intestinal regions smooth. H-shaped groove distinct. Tip of medium lobe of epistome stout. Distance between tip of sternopleonal cavity ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) and anterior margin of thoracic sternite 3 about 2.2 times length of thoracic sternites 1 and 2.
Chelipeds ( Fig. 2A, B View FIGURE 2 ) of adult male unequal, fingers of larger chela forming obliquely triangular gape when closed. Ambulatory legs ( Fig. 2A, C View FIGURE 2 ) smooth, dorsal, ventral margins of dactyli with 2 rows of small spines, respectively. Second leg about 1.8 carapace length. Telson bell-shaped, moderately short, width about 1.5 length.
Subterminal segment of G1 ( Fig. 3A–C View FIGURE 3 ) curving inwards, outer proximal margin without tooth in most specimen, some smaller specimen (<13.8 mm) with low tooth, inner proximal margin slightly dilated; terminal segment slightly curving outwards to almost straight; total length of G1 5.8 times terminal segment; length of synovial membrane about 4.6 times maximum width. Outer proximal margin of basal segment of G2 ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ) dilated, showing a single lobe; distal segment short, about 0.16 times total length.
Etymology. The species is derived from the Greek “ boreas ” (for north), alluding to the northernmost distribution of this species in the Central Range.
Ecological notes. The specimens were collected from the montane area with an elevation of 740 m (the Fushan Botanical Garden area) to 1100 m (Shenmihu) and about 1800 m (Tonghsan), but also extended to the coastal cliff area of Suao (elevation of 280 m) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). The distributional range of this species covers an area of 45 km (from Fushan to Shenmihu; Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). There was running water in most habitats ( Fig. 2D–F View FIGURE 2 ), but some crabs were more semiterrestrial, hiding under fallen leaves with only some seepage in Tongshan ( Fig. 2G, H View FIGURE 2 ). Other species sympatric with this species include members of the G. eucrinodonta species complex, G. tali and G. ilan Shy, Ng & Yu, 1994 in Fushan area ( Shih et al. 2010). In the higher altitude (Tongshan and Shenmihu), the habitats of the new species are near the Fagus hayatae ( Taiwan beech) forest ( Fig. 2E–H View FIGURE 2 ), with the mean (and standard deviation) water temperature 17.66 ± 2.12 oC (April 2018) and 23.25 ± 1.78 oC (May to September 2018), pH 7.4 ± 0.3 (April to October 2018) and dissolved oxygen 8.7 ± 0.9 mg /L (April to October 2018) in Shenmihu ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ).
Remarks. Geothelphusa boreas sp. nov. is morphologically most similar to G. takuan and G. tali which occurs in adjacent regions in northern Taiwan. The G1 structures remain the best way to separate them. The subterminal segment of the G1 of G. tali is straight ( Shy et al. 2020: fig. 124), while those of present new species and G. takuan are distinctly curved inwards ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ; Shy et al. 2020: fig. 121). In addition, the G1 subterminal segment in G. takuan has a distinct tooth on the outer proximal margin ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ), while in G. boreas , there is usually no tooth present on the structure (or at most with a faint knob in some small individuals) ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ). The distance between the tip of the sternopleonal cavity and the anterior margin of thoracic sternite 3 in G. takuan and G. tali being 1.0 times and 1.2 times the length of sternites 1 and 2, respectively, which are shorter than the ratio 2.2 times in G. boreas .
NTOU |
Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |