Zaitunia
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.214 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA243C98-9461-441A-BBD9-ECBDEC103DD9 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5634917 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA5402-E467-FFBE-EFD4-D2A9FAB8FA47 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Zaitunia |
| status |
|
Key to the species groups of Zaitunia View in CoL View at ENA
Males
(Males in the Zaitunia persica View in CoL -group are unknown.)
1. Cymbium longer than bulb, embolus short, without base, spermophore occupies whole bulb ( Figs 7 View Fig. 7 A– B,20A,C)……………………………………………………………………………………………2
– Cymbium shorter than bulb or subequal in length, embolus with long base, spermophore in base of embolus straight ( Figs 9 View Fig. 9 A–C, 10I, 13C–D, 24A–D, 27C, E, 28G–I, 30H–J, 32D–G, 35A–D, 37A–C) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
2. Dark coloured, carapace often without pattern, cymbium without retrolateral brush of modified setae, tegulum cylindrical with very wide spermophore occupying whole bulb ( Figs 7 View Fig. 7 A–D, 43A) ………… ……………………………………………………………………………………… schmitzi -group
– Pale coloured, cymbium with retrolateral brush of modified setae, tegulum rounded, terminal coil of spermophore 2 times thinner than basal coil ( Figs 20 View Fig. 20 A–C, 43E) …………………… logunovi View in CoL -group
3. Pale coloured; base of embolus with more or less developed ventral keel, either embolus completely screw-shaped or tip of embolus hooked or curved gradually ( Figs 24 View Fig. 24 A–D, 27C, E, 28G–I, 30H–J, 32D–G, 35A–D,37A–C,43F,44) ……………………………………………………………………4
– Dark coloured; base of embolus without ventral keel, only tip of embolus screw-shaped ( Figs 9 View Fig. 9 A–C, 10I, 13C–D, 43B–D) ……………………………………………………………… annulipes View in CoL -group
4. Embolus curved or hooked apically ( Figs 28 View Fig. 28 G–I, 30H–J, 32D–G, 35A–D, 37A–C, 44B–F) ………5
– Embolus screw-shaped ( Figs 24 View Fig. 24 A–D, 27C, E, 43F, 44A) ………………………… spinimana View in CoL -group
5. Embolus with raised keel, hooked apically ( Figs 28 View Fig. 28 G–I, 30H–J, 32D–G, 44C–D) ………………… ………………………………………………………………………………… beshkentica- group
– Embolus with vestigial keel, curved apically ( Figs 35 View Fig. 35 A–D, 37A–C, 44E–F) … maracandica View in CoL -group
Females
(Females of the spinimana , beshkentica and maracandica species groups can be confidently distinguished from each other only by the shape of the receptacles, but this feature is not a group-specific character).
1. Intensely brown-coloured spiders; abdomen uniformly brown; legs always with darker though diffuse fasciae ( Figs 5 View Fig. 5 A–B, 6A, 8E–G, 10A–E, 11A–E, 12A–B, D–E) ……………………………………2
– Pale yellowish-coloured spiders; abdomen pale yellow or yellowish-grey, with or without darker dorsal pattern; legs often uniformly pale without darker fasciae ( Figs 14 View Fig. 14 A–D, 15A–B, 16C, 17A–B, 18A, 19A–D, 22A–G, 26A, 27F, 29A–H, 30A–B, 31A, 34A, C–D, 35K, 36A–C, 38A–D, 39A–C, 41A–C) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………3
2. Legs I–IV with broader and less contrasting fasciae ( Figs 5 View Fig. 5 A–B, 6A); receptacles as in Figs 5 View Fig. 5 C–D, 7E–K ……………………………………………………………………………… schmitzi -group
– Legs I–IV with narrower and more contrasting fasciae ( Figs 8 View Fig. 8 E–G, 10A–E, 11A–E, 12A–B, D–E); receptacles as in Figs 9 View Fig. 9 D–F, 11F–G, 12G–I ……………………………………… annulipes View in CoL -group
3. Four distinct receptacle heads ( Figs 21 View Fig. 21 , 25 View Fig. 25 , 26 View Fig. 26 B–C, E, 27H–I, 29I –K, 30C–E, 32H–I, 35E–J, 36D–E, 38E–I, 40, 41I –M) …………………………………………………………………………………4
– Two receptacle heads, entire or subdivided ( Figs 14 View Fig. 14 G–K, 15E–G, 16A–B, D–F, 17D, F–H, 18D–E) ……………………………………………………………………………………… persica View in CoL -group
4. Median receptacles tubular, not diverging laterally and always considerably longer than lateral pair ( Fig. 21 View Fig. 21 ) …………………………………………………………………………… logunovi- group
– Median receptacles often rounded, of same size or even shorter than lateral pair ( Figs 26 View Fig. 26 B–C, E, 27H–I, 30C–E, 33A–B, D, 35E–J, 38E–I, 40, 41I –M); if longer, they diverge laterally as in Figs 25 View Fig. 25 , 29 View Fig. 29 I–K, 36D–E ………………………………………………………………………………………5
5. Receptacles as in Figs 25 View Fig. 25 , 26 View Fig. 26 B–C, E, 27H–I …………………………………… spinimana View in CoL - group
– Receptacles different ( Figs 29 View Fig. 29 I–K, 30C–E, 32H–I, 34E–J, 35D–E, 37E–I, 39, 41I –M) ………………6
6. Receptacles as in Figs 29 View Fig. 29 I–K, 30C–E, 33A–D ………………………………… beshkentica View in CoL - group
– Receptacles different ( Figs 35 View Fig. 35 E–J, 36D–E, 38E–I, 40, 41I –M) ……………… maracandica View in CoL - group
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.