Zaitunia logunovi, Sergei Zonstein & Yuri M. Marusik, 2016

Sergei Zonstein & Yuri M. Marusik, 2016, A revision of the spider genus Zaitunia (Araneae, Filistatidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 214, pp. 1-97 : 41-45

Zaitunia logunovi sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:116A2332-4326-4AAE-9878-0827BC1CB330

Figs 19–21 , 42 A–B, 43E

Diagnosis

Males of Z. logunovi sp. nov. differ from other congeners by a very short embolus directed forward (only Z. schmitzi possesses a similarly short embolus, but in the latter case the embolus is sidewarddirected, cf. Fig. 7 A–D). The ventral brush of setae on the cymbium adjoining the bulb is more welldeveloped than in any other congener (cf. Figs 24 C, 28G–I, 30I). Females are easily distinguished from all other female congeners except Z. annulipes and Z. halepensis sp. nov. by having long, non-divergent median receptacles considerably exceeding the small and globular lateral pair in size ( Fig. 21 ). Females of Z. logunovi sp. nov. differ from those of Z. annulipes and Z. halepensis sp. nov. by the shape of their digitiform (not clublike) median receptacles, which are considerably thinner than in the two latter species (cf. Figs 5 C–D, 9D–F).

Etymology

This species is named after our friend and colleague Dmitri Logunov (University of Manchester, Manchester, UK).

Material examined

Holotype

KYRGYZSTAN: ♂, foothills of Kyrghyz Mts, Chon-Aryk 2 km S of Bishkek, 42º47' N, 74º34' E, 1100–1200 m, 20 May 1984, S.V. Ovchinnikov ( TAU).

Paratypes (9 ♂♂, 44 ♀♀)

KYRGYZSTAN: 1 ♂, 8 ♀♀, same data as holotype.

KAZAKHSTAN: 6 ♀♀, 1 ♀ subad., north-western foothills of Trans-Ili Mts , Argaity gorge, 4 km SE of Akterek town, 43º15' N, 75º25' E, c. 1200 m, 22 May 1988, I.N. Smigunova ( TAU) ; 3 ♂♂, surroundings of Kordai (= Georgievka) town, 43º02' N, 74º43' E, 600–650 m, 11 Jun. 1983, S.V. Ovchinnikov ( TAU) ; 6 ♀♀, Chu-Ili Mts , Kordai Pass, 37 km NE of Kordai (Georgievka) town, 43º15' N, 74º50' E, 1200 m, 7 Apr. 1983, S. Zonstein & S.V. Ovchinnikov ( TAU) ; 2 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, same locality, 13–14 Jun. 1990, A.A. Feodorov & A.A. Zyuzin ( TAU) ; 10 ♀♀, same region, mountains 4–5 km N of Otar town , 43º32' N, 75º12' E, 11 May 1988, C.K. Tarabaev & M. Zarko ( TAU) ; 1 ♂, 6 ♀♀, same region, 18.5 km NW of Kenen town , 43º30' N, 74º53' E, 15 Jun. 1990, A.A. Feodorov & A.A. Zyuzin ( TAU) ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, same data ( ZMMU) ; 1 ♂, same region, 61 km on the Kopa-Kolshengel road, 4 km E of road, hills, 43º38.5' N, 75º48.2' E, 26 May 2003, A. Feodorov & N. Poddubskii ( AMNH) .

Description

Male (holotype)

HABITUS. See Fig. 19 E.

BODY LENGTH. 2.82.

COLOUR. Whole spider pale greyish-yellow; eye tubercle brownish-black; Y-shaped median spot occupying cephalic portion and extending to clypeus, and narrow margins of carapace light brown, as well as a weak and diffuse dorsal abdominal pattern consisting of interrupted median line anteriorly and a few transverse fasciae posteriorly.

CARAPACE ( Fig. 42 A). 1.24 long, 1.03 wide.

EYES. AME 0.07, ALE 0.13, PLE 0.12, PME 0.10, AME–AME 0.04.

PALP ( Figs 20 , 43 E; paratype from the type locality). Relatively long and slender; pale, without pigmentation; femur slightly longer than tibia; diameter of tibia 1.33 times wider than in femur; cymbium with distinct dorsal hump, about 2 times longer than bulb, retro- and proventral edge of cymbium with brush of thick and dense setae; bulb hemispherical; embolus short and screw-shaped, without a neck.

Leg measurements ♂ (♀).

	Femur	Patella	Tibia	Metatarsus	Tarsus	Total
Palp	0.82 (0.61)	0.28 (0.35)	0.79 (0.46)	―	0.32 (0.57)	2.02 (1.73)
I	1.93 (1.50)	0.52 (0.47)	1.83 (1.31)	1.81 (1.07)	1.15 (0.87)	6.54 (5.22)
II	1.49 (1.07)	0.45 (0.43)	1.39 (0.81)	1.43 (0.67)	0.90 (0.58)	5.18 (3.56)
III	1.34 (0.89)	0.43 (0.41)	1.17 (0.67)	1.37 (0.60)	0.83 (0.55)	4.60 (3.12)
IV	1.88 (1.29)	0.54 (0.44)	1.76 (0.93)	1.94 (0.91)	1.09 (0.67)	6.25 (4.24)

Female (paratype from Kordai)

HABITUS. See Fig. 19 C.

BODY LENGTH. 4.67.

COLOUR. As in male, but darker brownish pattern of carapace is more developed; dorsal abdominal pattern weaker; legs with a few incomplete darker fasciae.

CARAPACE ( Figs 19 D, 42B). 1.78 long, 1.43 wide.

EYES. AME 0.07, ALE 0.17, PLE 0.15, PME 0.10, AME–AME 0.05.

ENDOGYNE ( Fig. 21 ). Both pairs of receptacles cylindrical and with corrugated stems; median receptacles twice as long as laterals and about 1.3 times thinner, median receptacles with wide base and, in anterior view ( Fig. 21 C), both pairs of same diameter; gland pores cover only tips of receptacles.

Variations

Carapace length in males varies from 1.15 to 1.40, in females from 1.47 to 1.85. Darker pattern and markings in some specimens are almost indistinct ( Fig. 19 A).

Ecology

The species was found in steppe habitats in foothills and low mountains.

Distribution

Southeastern Kazakhstan and northern Kyrgyzstan ( Fig. 48 ).

Figures

Fig. 5. Zaitunia halepensis sp. nov., holotype, ♀. A – B. Habitus, lateral and dorsal. C – D. Endogyne.

Fig. 7. Copulatory organs of Zaitunia schmitzi (Kulczyński, 1911), ♂ (A – D) and ♀ (E – K) from Jerusalem area. — A – B. Palp, retrolateral and prolateral. C – D. Same, ventro-prolateral and ventroretrolateral. E, G, K. Endogyne, anterior. F. Same, posterior. H, J. Receptacles, dorsal and anterior. I. Endogyne, dorsal.

Fig. 19. Somatic characters of Zaitunia logunovi sp. nov., paratypes, ♀♀ (A – D, G), and holotype (E) and paratype (F), ♂♂. — A, C. Habitus, dorsal. B, E – F. Same, lateral. D. Prosoma, dorsal. G. Spinnerets, ventral. Scale bars: A, C = 1.0 mm; B, D – F = 0.5 mm; G = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 20. Palp of Zaitunia logunovi sp. nov., paratype, ♂. A – C. Terminal part, retrolateral, ventroretrolateral and prolateral. D – E. Entire palp, prolateral and proventral. Scale bars: A, C = 0.1 mm; B, E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 21. Endogyne of Zaitunia logunovi sp. nov., paratype, ♀. A – B, E – F. Endogyne, dorsal. C. Receptacles, posterior. D, G. Endogyne, dorsal-anterior. Scale bars: A – B = 0.1 mm; C – D = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 24. Somatic characters of Zaitunia martynovae (Andreeva & Tyshchenko, 1969), ♂ from Gandzhina. A, C. Habitus, dorsal and lateral. B, D. Prosoma, dorsal and lateral.

Fig. 42. Variations of coloration and setation of carapace in ♂♂ (A, D, F – G) and ♀♀ (B – C, E, H) of some Zaitunia species. — A – B. Z. logunovi sp. nov. C. Z. inderensis Ponomarev, 2005. D – E. Z. beshkentica (Andreeva & Tyshchenko, 1969). F. Zaitunia wunderlichi sp. nov. G – H. Z. maracandica (Charitonov, 1946). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 43. Male copulatory organs of Zaitunia species, retrolateral. A. Z. schmitzi (Kulczyński, 1911) (Jerusalem area). B. Z. annulipes (Kulczyński, 1908) (Paramali). C. Z. kunti sp. nov. (holotype). D. Z. minoica sp. nov. (paratype). E. Z. logunovi sp. nov. (paratype). F. Z. martynovae (Andreeva & Tyshchenko, 1969) (Gandzhina). Scale bars = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 48. Distribution of Zaitunia logunovi and Zaitunia martynovae species groups.