Phyllocacteae Salm-Dyck

Walter, Helmut E. & Guerrero, Pablo C., 2022, Towards a unified taxonomic catalogue for the Chilean cacti: assembling molecular systematics and classical taxonomy, Phytotaxa 550 (2), pp. 79-98 : 88

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.550.2.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6645741

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987C7-FFEF-FFBD-FF05-06F5FE61FDDB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Phyllocacteae Salm-Dyck
status

 

Tribe Phyllocacteae Salm-Dyck :

— Nyffeler & Eggli (2010) stated that the monophyly of the tribe is well supported by Nyffeler (2002) and Crozier (2005). Moreover, for nomenclatural reasons, the name Phyllocacteae (incl. Echinocereeae Buxb.) must be used because it has priority over all the other relevant tribal names, i.e. Hylocereeae Buxb. , Leptocereeae Buxb., Pachycereeae Buxb. and Peniocereeae Doweld. Despite of this, Hunt et al. (2013) placed the three Chilean genera ( Austrocactus Britton & Rose , Eulychnia Phil., and Corryocactus Britton & Rose ) within Echinocereeae Buxb., Nyffeler & Eggli (2010) proposed the following three subtribes, one of which (Subtribe Corryocactinae Buxb. ) includes the three Chilean genera. The relationships between Austrocactus , Eulychnia , and Corryocactus was corroborated by various molecular-based studies (e.g. Nyffeler 2002, Hernández-Hernández et al. 2011, Bárcenas et al. 2011).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF