Endecous (Endecous) liviae, Carvalho & Castro-Souza & Ferreira, 2023

Carvalho, Pedro Henrique Mendes, Castro-Souza, Rodrigo Antônio & Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes, 2023, Two new species of Endecous Saussure, 1878 (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae) from caves in central-western Brazil, with the proposition of a new subgenus to accommodate E. vitreus Bolfarini & Campos, 2023, Zootaxa 5353 (3), pp. 201-234 : 204-214

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5353.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A8B27F7F-5E7E-4DD4-8E92-A52DD0072BD1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8427409

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887FA-9A18-FFE1-D0D5-FB23BA6C50BC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Endecous (Endecous) liviae
status

sp. nov.

Endecous (Endecous) liviae n. sp.

( Figures 2–6 View FIGURES 2–6 , 7–15 View FIGURES 7–15 , 16–19 View FIGURES 16–19 , 20–27 View FIGURES 20–27 , 28–32 View FIGURES 28–32 , 33–36 View FIGURES 33–36 , 37–39 View FIGURES 37–39 , 40–43 View FIGURES 40–43 ; Table 1 View TABLE 1 )

Etymology— The specific epithet of the species is dedicated to the biospeleologist Lívia Medeiros Cordeiro Borghezan, whose dedication to the study and preservation of caves in the Serra da Bodoquena karst region has been exceptional. The specific epithet is expressed as a Latinized adjective, paying homage to her significant contributions.

Material examined— Holotype, ♂, code ISLA 106153 , Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, municipality of Bodoquena, Gruta do Alex II cave (56°42’35.06”W, 20°36’19.48”S), 02.X.2022, R.L. Ferreira; condition: head, right tegmen, legs I, II and III detached and stored alongside the holotype GoogleMaps , phallic complex dissected and also stored alongside the holotype. Allotype: 1 ♀, ISLA 106154, same data as the holotype; condition: legs I, II and III detached and stored alongside the alotype, copulatory papilla dissected and also stored alongside the alotype. Paratypes: 1 ♂, ISLA 106152, 1 ♀, ISLA 106155, same locality and data as the holotype; 4 ♂♂, ISLA 106132, ISLA 106133, ISLA 106134, ISLA 106135, municipality of Bonito   GoogleMaps , Gruta América cave (56°36’39.01”W, 21°11’28.89”S), 29.IX.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 5 ♂♂, ISLA 106144, ISLA 106145, ISLA 106146, ISLA 106147, ISLA 106148, 3 ♀♀, ISLA 106149, ISLA 106150, ISLA 106151, municipality of Bonito   GoogleMaps , Gruta Terra Planetária cave (56°36’8.46”W, 21° 8’4.36”S), 24.IX.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 1 ♂, ISLA 106156, 1 ♀, ISLA 106158, municipality of Bodoquena   GoogleMaps , Gruta Dona Benedita cave (56°43’23.51”W, 20°34’0.55”S), 26.IX.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 1 ♂, ISLA 106159, 1 ♀, ISLA 106160, municipality of Bodoquena   GoogleMaps , Gruta Manoel Cardoso cave (56°43’23.39”W, 20°34’7.12”S), 26.IX.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 2 ♂♂, ISLA 106171, ISLA 106172, 1 ♀, ISLA 106173, municipality of Bodoquena   GoogleMaps , Gruta do Bel I cave (56°42’59.17”W, 20°35’20.53”S), 03.X.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 1 ♀, ISLA 106174, municipality of Bodoquena   GoogleMaps , Gruta do Bel II cave (56°43’0.48”W, 20°35’22.19”S), 03.X.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 1 ♂, ISLA 106175, 1 ♀, ISLA 106176, municipality of Bonito   GoogleMaps , Gruta Catedral cave (56°50’46.90”W, 20°56’17.52”S), 05.X.2022, R. L. Ferreira; 2 ♂♂, ISLA 106177, ISLA 106178, 2 ♀♀ ISLA 106179, ISLA 106180, municipality of Bonito   GoogleMaps , Gruta do Lago Azul cave (56°35’28.91”W, 21°8’40.40”S), 19.IX.2004, R. L. Ferreira; male paratypes condition: right tegmen and legs I, II and III detached and stored alongside the paratype, phallic complex dissected and also stored alongside the paratype; female paratypes condition: legs I, II and III detached and stored alongside the paratype, copulatory papilla dissected and also stored alongside the paratype.

Diagnosis —Combination of the following characteristics: pseudepiphallic dorsal branches bending towards the center of the phallic complex, broadened at the base and tapered towards the apex, which is rounded ( Figs. 2, 4–6 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.db); pseudepiphallic rami elongated and triangular in shape ( Figs. 2–6 View FIGURES 2–6 , R); inner bars of the ectophallic invagination forming a V-shaped structure, with a less sclerotized, subtriangular in shape, dorsocentral projected extension ( Figs. 2, 4–6 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.ib); ectophallic arc well-developed, conical and rounded, central portion bordering the base of the ectophallic median projections ( Figs. 2 and 3 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ect.arc); anterior portion of the endophallus well-developed, sclerotized, with a long apodeme on the opposite side of the central groove ( Figs. 2, 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , End.sc.a).

Male phallic sclerites (holotype ISLA 106153, Figs.2–6 View FIGURES 2–6 )—Phallic complex longer than broad and dorsoventrally flattened. Pseudepiphallus: arms slightly elongated and broadened laterally ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.arm); dorsal branches sclerotized, bending towards the center of the phallic complex, broadened at the base and tapered towards the apex, which is rounded ( Figs. 2 and 4 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.db); ventral branches elongated and sclerotized, reaching the dorsolateral portion of the pseudepiphallic parameres ( Figs. 5 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , A); paramere 1 and 2 fused in a single sclerotized and concave structure, C-shaped in dorsal view, proximal end ventrally projected, bending and pointing outwards ( Figs. 2 and 3 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.p); inner bars slightly concave, inclined, forming a V-shaped structure, with a less sclerotized, subtriangular in shape, dorsocentral projected extension in dorsal view ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ps.ib); rami elongated, slightly longer than the ectophallic apodeme in dorsal and ventral views, broadened at the base, tapered at the end, triangular in shape in lateral view ( Figs. 2, 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , R). Ectophallic invagination: ectophallic arc well-developed, conical and rounded, central portion bordering the base of the ectophallic median projections ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ect.arc); apodemes short and slightly sclerotized, distal end slightly curved inwards ( Figs. 2, 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ect.ap); median projections thin, sinuous and barely sclerotized, reaching the pseudepiphallic parameres in dorsal view ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ect.mp); lateral bars well-developed, elongated, curved outwards, tapered at the apex, reaching the outer ventral portion of the pseudepiphallic parameres ( Figs. 3, 5 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , Ect.lb). Endophallus: anterior portion well-developed, sclerotized, with a long apodeme on the opposite side of the central groove ( Figs. 2, 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , End.sc.a); duct membranous, elongated, longer than the ectophallic apodeme and widened dorsoventrally at the connection to the sclerite anterior portion ( Figs. 2, 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , End.sc.d); posterior portion membranous and well-developed, dorsally projected, almost touching the pseudepiphallic dorsal branches ( Figs. 3 and 6 View FIGURES 2–6 , End.sc.p).

Variations in phallic sclerites (holotype and paratypes, n = 7, ISLA 106132, ISLA 106133, ISLA 106144, ISLA 106145, ISLA 106153, ISLA 106156, ISLA 106159)—Phallic complexes vary slightly in size and degree of sclerotization, being more or less flattened dorsoventrally; pseudepiphallic arms (Ps.arm) vary slightly in length; pseudepiphallic dorsal branches (Ps.db) vary slightly in degree of inclination towards the center of the phallic complex, the tips almost touching or slightly distant from one another, varying slightly in sinuosity; pseudepiphallic inner bars (Ps.ib) vary slightly in degree of inclination, dorsocentral extension varying in size and varying slightly in shape; ectophallic arcs (Ect.arc) central extension vary in length; ectophallic apodemes (Ect.ap) vary slightly in degree of sinuosity and sclerotization; endophallic sclerite posterior portion (End.sc.p) more or less projected dorsally.

Morphology (holotype ISLA 106153, Figs. 7–20 View FIGURES 7–15 View FIGURES 16–19 View FIGURES 20–27 )— Body color: vertex, scape, pedicel and flagellum yellowish brown; fastigium dark brown; front and gena varying from light yellow to white, partially covered by a dotted brown mark; clypeus and labrum also varying from light yellow to white; mandibles and maxiles yellowish brown, galea and labium white; ommatidia black, with a slightly depigmented area near the base of the antennal scapes ( Figs. 9–11 View FIGURES 7–15 ); maxillary palpomeres I and II whitish, maxillary palpomeres III, IV and V light yellow, palpomere V white at the tip; all labial palpomeres light yellowish brown, labial palpomere III white at the tip ( Figs. 10 and 11 View FIGURES 7–15 ); pronotum, tegmina and abdomen yellowish brown, tergites distal portion brown ( Figs. 7, 8, 12 and 13 View FIGURES 7–15 ); supra-anal plate yellowish brown, subgenital plate light yellow proximally, whitish in the central to distal region, and darkened towards the distal end ( Figs. 13, 14 and 15 View FIGURES 7–15 ); cerci yellowish brown, darker at first sight due to the presence of setae ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 7–15 ); legs yellowish brown, white at their base ( Figs. 16–19 View FIGURES 16–19 ). Head: slightly pubescent, elongated in frontal view; fastigium as a short and broad extension of the vertex, inclined and pointing downwards, with long bristles; mandibles sclerotized at the apex and lateral margins; maxiles sclerotized at the apex; maxillary palpomeres I and II short and same-sized, III–V longer, palpomere V claviform; labial palpomeres I–III increasing in size, palpomere III dilated at the apex; compound eyes reduced and elliptical, ocelli absent ( Figs. 9–11 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Thorax: pronotum dorsal disk broader than long (3.82 mm and 2.38 mm in width and length, respectively), pubescent, anterior and posterior margins arched and covered in long bristles, lateral lobes subtriangular in shape and slightly shifted towards the head ( Figs. 7 and 12 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Right tegmen: slightly sclerotized; covering the first two urotergites (3.59 mm and 4.43 mm in width and length, respectively); harp with one complete and four incomplete crossveins (two bifurcated proximally); mirror subtriangular, with one arched crossvein, and two cells; basal field with two secondary veins connecting Cu2 to 1A, 1A and 2A veins connected through a poorly-marked secondary vein; lateral field with two almost completely parallel longitudinal veins and several anastomotic poorly-marked secondary veins ( Figs. 8, 12 View FIGURES 7–15 and 20 View FIGURES 20–27 ); stridulatory file with 64 teeth. Abdomen: cerci pubescent, with long bristles throughout all their extension and globose setae at their base, mostly on the inner side ( Figs. 13–15 View FIGURES 7–15 ); supra-anal plate shorter than the subgenital plate, subtriangular, distal margin rounded and covered in long bristles, lateral projections short and rounded, paraprocts slightly longer than the supra-anal plate ( Figs. 13 and 14 View FIGURES 7–15 ); subgenital plate proximal margin substraight, distal margin rounded, with a small dent in the center and covered in bristles ( Figs. 13–15 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Legs: pubescent. Leg I ( Figs. 16 and 17 View FIGURES 16–19 ): tibia with an oval tympanum on its inner side and two ventral apical spurs; tarsomere I ventrally serrated and longer than tarsomeres II and III together. Leg II ( Figs. 16 and 17 View FIGURES 16–19 ): tibia with two ventral apical spurs of equal size and two lateral short spurs, one on each side; tarsomere I ventrally serrated and longer than tarsomeres II and III together. Leg III ( Figs. 18 and 19 View FIGURES 16–19 ): femur developed; tibia longer than the femur (10.29 mm and 9.79 mm, respectively); tibia armed with three subapical spurs on the inner side ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16–19 ; m, n, o), four on the outer side ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16–19 ; w, x, y, z), the most distal one, “z”, being the shortest, four apical spurs on the inner side ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16–19 ; d, e, f, g), spurs “e” and “f” longer the “d” and “g”, and three on the outer side ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16–19 ; a, b, c), spur “a” being the longest and “c” the shortest; tarsomere I longer than tarsomeres II and III together, ventrally serrated, with two apical spurs, the inner one being the longest.

Variations in right tegmina (holotype and paratypes, n = 8, ISLA 106133, ISLA 106134, ISLA 106145, ISLA 106146, ISLA 106153, ISLA 106156, ISLA 106159, ISLA 106171, Figs. 20–27 View FIGURES 20–27 )— Stridulatory file with 65 ± 5.16 teeth (n = 10, holotype and paratypes). Harp with one ( Figs. 20 and 23 View FIGURES 20–27 ), two ( Figs. 22, 24 and 26 View FIGURES 20–27 ), three ( Figs. 25 and 27 View FIGURES 20–27 ) or four ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20–27 ) complete diagonal crossveins; incomplete crossveins may be present, some of them reaching a light-colored longitudinal striation ( Figs. 20 and 23 View FIGURES 20–27 ). Mirror with one ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–27 ), two ( Figs. 21–24, 26 and 27 View FIGURES 20–27 ) or three ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 20–27 ) complete crossveins, the second and third most distal ones are connected through a secondary vein; an incomplete crossvein may be present ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 20–27 ); mirror outline inconsistent due to variations in the form of the distal margin. Basal field with poorly-marked secondary veins branching out of 1A and reaching Cu2; 1A may be directly connected to Cu2 ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 20–27 ); 1A may also be fragmented in two and connected to the central portion of Cu2 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–27 ); 1A, 2A and 3A well-marked. Lateral field with two parallel longitudinal veins that may or may not be connected through short secondary veins; anastomosis of poorly-marked secondary veins branching out of the longitudinal veins; secondary veins reaching the right margin of the tegmina.

Female morphology (allotype ISLA 106154 Figs. 28–32 View FIGURES 28–32 )—same pattern of body coloration as the male, but slightly darker; bigger than the male (22.92 ± 2.86 mm and 19.16 ± 2.17 mm in length, respectively); apterous; supra-anal plate subtriangular in shape, pubescent, with long bristles covering the distal margin, which is rounded, lateral projections short and rounded ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 28–32 ); subgenital plate pubescent, lateral margins angled inwards from the base, distal margin W-shaped ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 28–32 ); ovipositor (10.89 mm in length) shorter than the cerci, shaped like a curved sword, with a dorsoventral constriction near the tip, apex acute like an arrow-head ( Figs. 30–32 View FIGURES 28–32 ).

Copulatory papilla (allotype ISLA 106154, Fig. 33 View FIGURES 33–36 )—sclerotized and chalice-like; anterior potion broadened, ventral side with a less sclerotized V-shaped region, like a deep indentation, ventral margin slightly longer than the dorsal margin; posterior portion membranous with a small circular opening on the ventral side.

Variations in copulatory papillae (allotype and paratypes, ISLA 106149, ISLA 106154, ISLA 106155, ISLA 106173, Figs. 33–36 View FIGURES 33–36 )—less sclerotized region on the ventral side may be reduced in size and U-shaped; a small Vshaped dent may be present in the center of the dorsal margin.

Ecological remarks —Specimens of Endecous (E.) liviae n. sp. were found in nine caves located in the municipalities of Bodoquena (Gruta Dona Benedita, Gruta Manoel Cardoso, Gruta do Bel I, Gruta do Bel II and Gruta Alex II caves) and Bonito (Gruta América— Figs. 38 and 39 View FIGURES 37–39 , Gruta Catedral, Gruta do Lago Azul and Gruta Terra Planetária caves). Given the limited sampling of caves conducted by the authors, it is probable that the species has a widespread distribution in the region, potentially occurring in additional caves. Unfortunately, the once pristine vegetation in the area has undergone significant alterations over the past few decades due to extensive agricultural and pasture activities. Consequently, the landscape has become highly fragmented, with the remaining forests largely associated with the limestone outcrops ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37–39 ). This inference is supported by the abundance of caves in the area, coupled with the considerable distance between the caves where the three populations were found (68 km in a straight line between the farthest caves). Most adult specimens were observed on the caves’ walls ( Figs. 40 and 41 View FIGURES 40–43 ), while in several locations, they were found concealed within speleothems and rock crevices ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40–43 ). This behavior suggests a certain degree of photophobia, as the presence of researchers equipped with headlamps may disturb them, causing them to seek shelter. Nevertheless, adult specimens, particularly males, could be easily found while engaging in vocalizations as part of their courtship behavior aimed at attracting females ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 40–43 ).Another noteworthy observation is that the majority of specimens found in all caves were in their immature stages. Consequently, locating adult individuals proved to be more challenging, potentially indicating the difficulty in reaching adulthood. This can be attributed to the presence of several predators within the caves that prey upon immature specimens. As a result, only a small proportion of the immature individuals are likely to successfully transition into adulthood due to the substantial predation pressure they face.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

Family

Phalangopsidae

Genus

Endecous

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF