Medionops Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.773.1511 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD4A74C5-9746-4DB0-A252-82711FEB13E4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7474470 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887D5-FF93-FFB8-55DA-FB7BFAA8D2EE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Medionops Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 |
status |
|
Genus Medionops Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
Updated key to the species of Medionops Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017
1. Abdomen dorsally with remarkable pattern of gray chevrons or stains ( Figs 1A, C View Fig , 2A, C View Fig , 3A View Fig ) .... 2
– Abdomen dorsally with unremarkable pattern of very fine gray chevron lines, almost unnoticeable (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: figs 17a–b, 20a) ........................................................................ 10
2. Abdomen dorsally with five pairs of irregular dark gray stains forming two longitudinal bands (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: figs 18a–b, 10a) .......................................................................... 3
– Abdomen dorsally with five whitish gray chevron stripes, which decrease in size towards the posterior part of abdomen ( Figs 1A, C View Fig , 2A, C View Fig , 3A View Fig ) ......................................................................... 4
3. Dorsal irregular dark gray stains on abdomen very close to each other, almost touching (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 18a–b); crista very short; body more than 5 mm total length .................................................................................................... M. simla (Chickering, 1967) View in CoL
– Dorsal irregular dark gray stains on abdomen widely separated from each other, not touching (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 10a); crista absent (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 9k); body less than 3 mm total length .............................. M. claudiae Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
4. Gladius absent (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: figs 11c–d, F, 13b–c) ........................................... ....................................................................................... M. murici Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
– Gladius present (Dupérré 2014: fig.4; Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: figs 3g, 9k, 15e) .............. 5
5. Crista short but noticeable (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 3g, j), reaching at least ¼ or 1 / of 5 metatarsal length ............................................................................................................................... 6
– Crista unnoticeable (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 15e–f), only 1 / or less of metatarsal 6 length, or absent ................................................................................................................................ 7
6. Males embolus tip with several blade–shaped projections (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 2j– l); female posterior plate with internally projected median septum (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 4j–l) ......................................................................... M. blades Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
– Males with smooth embolus tip, without projections (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 7d–e); female posterior plate without internally projected median septum (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 7g –i) .................................................................................................... M. cesari (Dupérré, 2014) View in CoL
7. Abdomen dorsally with pattern of five large, wide whitish gray chevrons, which reach the lateral whitish gray spots ( Figs 2A, C View Fig , 3A View Fig ), ventrally with a pair of longitudinal stripes occupying only the posterior third of the abdomen ( Figs 2B, D View Fig , 3B View Fig ); males with bulb greater than patella length ( Fig. 2E–F View Fig ) ........................................................................................................................................ 8
– Abdomen dorsally with pattern of five small, narrow whitish gray chevrons, that never reach the lateral whitish gray spots ( Figs 4A, C View Fig , 5A View Fig ), ventrally without a pair of longitudinal stripes ( Figs 4B, D View Fig , 5B View Fig ); males with bulb equal to or smaller than the patella length ( Fig. 4E–F View Fig ) ............................. 9
8. Embolus slightly curved anteriorly, tip with accentuated curvature ( Fig. 2E–F View Fig ) ............................... ...................................................................................................... M. carolinae View in CoL sp. nov. (only males)
– Embolus strongly angled at base and slightly sinuous ( Figs 3C–D View Fig , 7C View Fig ), tip almost straight ( Fig. 3C– D View Fig ) ....................................................................................................... M. cauca View in CoL sp. nov. (only males)
9. Embolus more than 3 × the maximum tegular width, tip pointed ( Fig. 4E–F View Fig ) ................................... .................................................................................................... M. luiscarlosi View in CoL sp. nov. (only males)
– Embolus less than 3 × the maximum tegular width, tip truncated ( Fig. 5C–D View Fig ) ................................. ..................................................................................................... M. santarosa View in CoL sp. nov. (only males)
10. Crista short but noticeable, not reaching one fourth of metatarsal length; body more than 4.5 mm total length;males with embolus length more than3×the maximum diameter of the tegulum(Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 19g –h), known only from Venezuela M. tabay Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
– Crista unnoticeable (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 15d–f); body less than 3.5 mm total length; males with embolus length over less than 3 × the maximum diameter of the tegulum (Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit 2017: fig. 16a–b), known only from southeast coast of Brazil.......................................................................... M. ramirezi Sánchez-Ruiz & Brescovit, 2017 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.