Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5555.4.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:24FACE7D-F2B3-47CB-BF71-FF85CBECE77C |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14596148 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787E5-CF10-FFF8-0ED7-B76B1E9AF8FA |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 |
| status |
|
Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL
Figs 1C View FIGURE 1 , 14A–E View FIGURE 14
Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021a: 3 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 2–6 (holotype, ♂, BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz department: Cafetal coffee plantation, 3 km west of Buena Vista village; in Instituto de Biología Subtropical , Misiones , Argentina , IBSI-Ara 1507, not examined)
Diagnosis. Males of Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus resemble those of M. formicus comb. nov. and M. drogon spec. nov. by the tibia I ventral spination 3-3 and by the presence of a tegular process in the male palp ( Figs 14D, I View FIGURE 14 ) but can recognized by the RTP being wider than the embolus ( Fig. 14D View FIGURE 14 ). Females differ from other Myrmecotypus by the presence of two furrows below the copulatory openings (Perger & Rubio 2021: fig. 3B)
Description. Perger & Rubio (2021).
New records. PERU: Madre de Dios, Zona Reservada Manu, Puesto Reservada de Manu, Puesto de Vigil. , Pakitza , Zone 2 forest, 11°58’S 71°18’W, 1♂, 9.X.1987, D. Silva & J. Coddington leg. ( USMN) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Peru and Bolivia ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Myrmecotypus rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021
| Silva-Junior, Cláudio J. & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2024 |