Myrmecotypus, O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5555.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:24FACE7D-F2B3-47CB-BF71-FF85CBECE77C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787E5-CF06-FFEB-0ED7-B6681992FC0C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Myrmecotypus |
status |
|
Key to species of Myrmecotypus View in CoL
1 Males (those of M. atratoides spec. nov., M. fuliginosus View in CoL and M. lineatipes View in CoL unknown)................................ 2
- Females (those of M. formicus comb. nov., M. drogon spec. nov. and M. jasmineae View in CoL unknown)....................... 20
2(1) Tibia I ventral spination 2-2; all eyes of similar size; abdomen strongly constricted medially ( Reiskind 1969: figs 111, 112, 153–155)...................................................................... M. lineatus (Emerton, 1909) View in CoL
- Tibia I ventral spination 3-2, 3-3, 4-3 or 4-4; AME larger than other eyes; abdomen oval to round, without constriction..... 3
3(2) Palp with retroapical tegular projection ( Figs 4G–H View FIGURE 4 , 8G–H View FIGURE 8 , 14D View FIGURE 14 , 20G View FIGURE 20 , 22G View FIGURE 22 )...................................... 4
- Palp without retroapical tegular projection ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 6G View FIGURE 6 , 12G View FIGURE 12 )................................................ 11
4(3) Tegular process present ( Figs 14D, I View FIGURE 14 , 15D View FIGURE 15 )................................................................. 5
- Tegular process absent ( Fig. 20G View FIGURE 20 )........................................................................ 7
5(4) Embolus longer than RTP ( Fig. 15D View FIGURE 15 )...................................................... M. drogon spec. nov.
- Embolus shorter or same length as RTP.................................................................... 6
6(5) RTP pointed, wider than the embolus ( Figs 14D–E View FIGURE 14 ).......................... M. rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL
- RTP blunt, narrower than embolus ( Figs 14I–J View FIGURE 14 )................................ M. formicus ( Simon, 1896) comb. nov.
7(4) Tibia I ventral spination 3-3............................................................................. 8
- Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or 4-4....................................................................... 10
8(7) RTP tip visible in ventral view, inserted far from embolar base................................................. 9
- RTP tip hidden in ventral view, inserted near embolar base ( Reiskind 1969: figs 255–257)....... M. orpheus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL
9(8) Base of the RTP as wide as the tip; embolus curved ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 )........................ M. haddadi Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL
- Base of the RTP wider than the tip; embolus straight ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 )................................. M. ciriaco spec. nov.
10(7) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3; RTP weakly sclerotized, flat ( Fig. 20G, H View FIGURE 20 )......................... M. balerion spec. nov.
- Tibia I ventral spination 4-4; RTP strongly sclerotized, hook-shaped ( Fig. 8G, H View FIGURE 8 )............... M. niger Chickering, 1937 View in CoL
11(3) Sperm duct narrow, nearly the same width as embolus ( Figs 6G View FIGURE 6 , 24G View FIGURE 24 ).......................................... 12
- Sperm duct wider than embolus ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4G View FIGURE 4 )............................................................. 13
12(11) Small pre-embolic ridge present; embolus with two keels; abdomen completely dark ( Fig. 6A–G View FIGURE 6 )............................................................................................ M. tahyinandu Perger & Rubio, 2020 View in CoL
- Pre-embolic ridge absent; embolus curved, without keels; abdomen white dorsally and with white spot ventrally ( Fig. 24A– G View FIGURE 24 ).............................................................................. M. rapaxoides spec. nov.
13(11) Coxae I and II bright white to yellow-white, much lighter than coxae III and IV ( Figs 2C, F, I View FIGURE 2 , 4C View FIGURE 4 , 6C, F View FIGURE 6 ).............. 14
- Coxal color pattern otherwise........................................................................... 17
14(13) Coxa I light brown, II white ( Figs 4C View FIGURE 4 , 8C View FIGURE 8 , 15C View FIGURE 15 )............................................................ 15
- Coxae I and II white ( Figs 2C, F View FIGURE 2 , 6C, F View FIGURE 6 , 22C, F View FIGURE 22 )............................................................ 16
15(14) RTA present; embolus short, folded ( Fig. 18G–H View FIGURE 18 )............................................. M. ednae spec. nov.
- RTA absent; embolus longer, straight ( Fig. 19G–H View FIGURE 19 )........................................ M. candianii spec. nov.
16(14) Carapace with a dense longitudinal row of erect hairs on thoracic region; paracymbial spine absent; embolus short, straight ( Reiskind 1969: figs 262–263)................................................... M. rettenmeyeri Unzicker, 1965 View in CoL
- Carapace without row of hairs; paracymbial spines present; embolus very long and curved ( Fig. 3A, B View FIGURE 3 )............................................................................................... M. olympus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL
17(13) Coxa II much lighter than coxae I, III and IV ( Fig. 12C, F View FIGURE 12 )................................................... 17
- Coxae II and III much lighter than coxae I and IV ( Fig. 16C, F View FIGURE 16 )................................................ 19
18(17) RTA present; sperm duct long, four-folded; embolus short, proximal area wider than the distal ( Figs 9–11 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 )............................................................................ M. dacetonoides ( Mello-Leitão, 1948) comb. nov.
- RTA absent; sperm duct short, two-folded; embolus long, proximal area as narrow as the distal ( Reiskind 1969: figs 247, 248) M. pilosus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) View in CoL
19(17) Pre-embolic ridge absent; embolus long, narrow, with spiraled tip ( Leister & Miller 2014: fig. 1D–G).......................................................................................... M. jasmineae Leister & Miller, 2014 View in CoL
- Pre-embolic ridge present; embolus short, wide, with smooth tip ( Fig. 16G, H View FIGURE 16 ).................. M. regianeae spec. nov.
20(1) Tibia I ventral spination 2-2; all eyes of similar size; abdomen strongly constricted medially ( Reiskind 1969: figs 111, 112, 153–155)...................................................................... M. lineatus (Emerton, 1909) View in CoL
- Tibia I ventral spination 3-2 or more; AME larger than other eyes; abdomen oval to round, without constriction......... 21
21(19) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or more..................................................................... 22
- Tibia I ventral spination 3-3 or 3-2....................................................................... 24
22(21) Tibia I ventral spination 5-5; two large posterior furrows (Perger & Rubio 2021: fig. 3B)................................................................................................. M. rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL
- Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or 4-4; posterior furrows absent.................................................. 23
23(22) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3; epigyne with continuous transverse ridge and a median T-shaped sclerotization ( Fig. 20I View FIGURE 20 )........................................................................................ M. balerion spec. nov.
- Tibia I ventral spination 4-4; epigynal transverse ridge interrupted medially, median sclerotization absent ( Fig. 8I View FIGURE 8 )........................................................................................ M. niger Chickering, 1937 View in CoL
24(21) Epigyne without a transverse ridge anterior to copulatory openings ( Figs 3C View FIGURE 3 , 4J View FIGURE 4 , 16I View FIGURE 16 ).............................. 25
- Epigyne with a transverse ridge anterior to copulatory openings ( Figs 6I View FIGURE 6 , 12M View FIGURE 12 , 19I View FIGURE 19 )................................ 30
25(24) Epigyne with a posterior plate projected over epigastric groove ( Fig. 22I, J View FIGURE 22 )....................... M. ciriaco spec. nov.
- Epigyne without such a plate ( Figs 4I View FIGURE 4 , 16I View FIGURE 16 )................................................................ 26
26(25) Coxa I and II much lighter than coxae III and IV........................................................... 27
- Coxae II and III much lighter than coxae I and IV........................................................... 29
27(26) Copulatory apertures ventrally directed; epigynal plate without medial depressions ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ).................................................................................................... M. haddadi Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL
- Copulatory apertures anteriorly directed; epigynal plate with medial depressions ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ).......................... 28
28(27) Anterior border of epigynal medial depressions strongly recurved ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ).................. M. olympus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL
- Anterior border of epigynal medial depressions nearly straight ( Reiskind 1969: figs 253–254)........ M. orpheus Reiskind View in CoL
29(26) Epigyne with ventral surface wrinkled; copulatory openings directed ventrally ( Fig. 16I View FIGURE 16 )........... M. regianeae spec. nov.
- Epigyne with ventral surface smooth; copulatory openings directed laterally ( Reiskind 1969: figs 249, 250).......................................................................................... M. lineatipes Chickering, 1937 View in CoL
30(24) Epigynal transverse ridge interrupted medially ( Figs 18I View FIGURE 18 , 19I View FIGURE 19 )................................................. 31
- Epigynal transverse ridge continuous ( Figs 6I View FIGURE 6 , 24I View FIGURE 24 )......................................................... 32
31(30) Epigynal transverse ridge procurved, with marginal sclerotized area small ( Fig. 19I View FIGURE 19 ).............. M. candianii spec. nov.
- Epigynal transverse ridge recurved, with marginal sclerotized area large ( Fig. 18I View FIGURE 18 )................... M. ednae spec. nov
32(30) Wide constriction on carapace (over legs I and II); cephalic region colored differently to the thoracic ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 )............................................................................................. M. atratoides spec. nov.
- Narrow dorsal constriction on carapace (only over leg II or between I and II); cephalic region and thoracic of same color.. 33
33(32) Thoracic region elongate, at least twice the length of the cephalic region ( Figs 6B, E View FIGURE 6 , 24B, E View FIGURE 24 )........................ 34
- Thoracic region short, one and a half times the length of the cephalic region or less ( Figs 2B, E View FIGURE 2 , 11B, E View FIGURE 11 )............... 35
34(33) Abdomen white dorsally, one large spot in the middle and two white spots in posterior area ventrally; groove below the epigynal ridge absent ( Fig. 24D–F, I View FIGURE 24 ).......................................................... M. rapaxoides spec. nov.
- Abdomen completely dark; groove below the epigynal ridge present ( Fig. 6F, I View FIGURE 6 )....... M. tahyinandu Perger & Rubio, 2020 View in CoL
35(33) Longitudinal band of erect black hairs down back of thoracic region present; epigynal transverse ridge present, M-shaped ( Reiskind 1969: figs 264, 265)................................................... M. rettenmeyeri Unzicker, 1965 View in CoL
- Longitudinal band of erect black hairs down back thoracic region absent; epigynal transverse ridge otherwise ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ).. 36
36(35) Epigynal transverse ridge sinuous; primary spermathecae strongly reduced ( Reiskind 1969: figs 245–248)................................................................................... M. pilosus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) View in CoL
- Epigynal transverse ridge V-shaped; primary spermathecae almost the same size as secondary....................... 37
37(36) Coxae II and III much clearer than I and IV; groove below the epigynal ridge present ( Reiskind 1969: figs 251, 252)........................................................................ M. fuliginosus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 View in CoL
- Coxa III never white; groove below the epigynal ridge absent ( Figs 10C View FIGURE 10 , 11F View FIGURE 11 , 12H View FIGURE 12 , 11I View FIGURE 11 , 12M View FIGURE 12 )..................................................................................... M. dacetonoides ( Mello-Leitão, 1948) comb. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.