Myrmecotypus, O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894

Silva-Junior, Cláudio J. & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2024, A revision of the South American species of the ant-mimicking spider genus Myrmecotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 (Araneae: Corinnidae: Castianeirinae), Zootaxa 5555 (4), pp. 451-496 : 454-456

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5555.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:24FACE7D-F2B3-47CB-BF71-FF85CBECE77C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14637464

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787E5-CF06-FFEB-0ED7-B6681992FC0C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Myrmecotypus
status

 

Key to species of Myrmecotypus View in CoL

1 Males (those of M. atratoides spec. nov., M. fuliginosus View in CoL and M. lineatipes View in CoL unknown)................................ 2

- Females (those of M. formicus comb. nov., M. drogon spec. nov. and M. jasmineae View in CoL unknown)....................... 20

2(1) Tibia I ventral spination 2-2; all eyes of similar size; abdomen strongly constricted medially ( Reiskind 1969: figs 111, 112, 153–155)...................................................................... M. lineatus (Emerton, 1909) View in CoL

- Tibia I ventral spination 3-2, 3-3, 4-3 or 4-4; AME larger than other eyes; abdomen oval to round, without constriction..... 3

3(2) Palp with retroapical tegular projection ( Figs 4G–H View FIGURE 4 , 8G–H View FIGURE 8 , 14D View FIGURE 14 , 20G View FIGURE 20 , 22G View FIGURE 22 )...................................... 4

- Palp without retroapical tegular projection ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 6G View FIGURE 6 , 12G View FIGURE 12 )................................................ 11

4(3) Tegular process present ( Figs 14D, I View FIGURE 14 , 15D View FIGURE 15 )................................................................. 5

- Tegular process absent ( Fig. 20G View FIGURE 20 )........................................................................ 7

5(4) Embolus longer than RTP ( Fig. 15D View FIGURE 15 )...................................................... M. drogon spec. nov.

- Embolus shorter or same length as RTP.................................................................... 6

6(5) RTP pointed, wider than the embolus ( Figs 14D–E View FIGURE 14 ).......................... M. rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL

- RTP blunt, narrower than embolus ( Figs 14I–J View FIGURE 14 )................................ M. formicus ( Simon, 1896) comb. nov.

7(4) Tibia I ventral spination 3-3............................................................................. 8

- Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or 4-4....................................................................... 10

8(7) RTP tip visible in ventral view, inserted far from embolar base................................................. 9

- RTP tip hidden in ventral view, inserted near embolar base ( Reiskind 1969: figs 255–257)....... M. orpheus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL

9(8) Base of the RTP as wide as the tip; embolus curved ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 )........................ M. haddadi Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL

- Base of the RTP wider than the tip; embolus straight ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 )................................. M. ciriaco spec. nov.

10(7) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3; RTP weakly sclerotized, flat ( Fig. 20G, H View FIGURE 20 )......................... M. balerion spec. nov.

- Tibia I ventral spination 4-4; RTP strongly sclerotized, hook-shaped ( Fig. 8G, H View FIGURE 8 )............... M. niger Chickering, 1937 View in CoL

11(3) Sperm duct narrow, nearly the same width as embolus ( Figs 6G View FIGURE 6 , 24G View FIGURE 24 ).......................................... 12

- Sperm duct wider than embolus ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4G View FIGURE 4 )............................................................. 13

12(11) Small pre-embolic ridge present; embolus with two keels; abdomen completely dark ( Fig. 6A–G View FIGURE 6 )............................................................................................ M. tahyinandu Perger & Rubio, 2020 View in CoL

- Pre-embolic ridge absent; embolus curved, without keels; abdomen white dorsally and with white spot ventrally ( Fig. 24A– G View FIGURE 24 ).............................................................................. M. rapaxoides spec. nov.

13(11) Coxae I and II bright white to yellow-white, much lighter than coxae III and IV ( Figs 2C, F, I View FIGURE 2 , 4C View FIGURE 4 , 6C, F View FIGURE 6 ).............. 14

- Coxal color pattern otherwise........................................................................... 17

14(13) Coxa I light brown, II white ( Figs 4C View FIGURE 4 , 8C View FIGURE 8 , 15C View FIGURE 15 )............................................................ 15

- Coxae I and II white ( Figs 2C, F View FIGURE 2 , 6C, F View FIGURE 6 , 22C, F View FIGURE 22 )............................................................ 16

15(14) RTA present; embolus short, folded ( Fig. 18G–H View FIGURE 18 )............................................. M. ednae spec. nov.

- RTA absent; embolus longer, straight ( Fig. 19G–H View FIGURE 19 )........................................ M. candianii spec. nov.

16(14) Carapace with a dense longitudinal row of erect hairs on thoracic region; paracymbial spine absent; embolus short, straight ( Reiskind 1969: figs 262–263)................................................... M. rettenmeyeri Unzicker, 1965 View in CoL

- Carapace without row of hairs; paracymbial spines present; embolus very long and curved ( Fig. 3A, B View FIGURE 3 )............................................................................................... M. olympus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL

17(13) Coxa II much lighter than coxae I, III and IV ( Fig. 12C, F View FIGURE 12 )................................................... 17

- Coxae II and III much lighter than coxae I and IV ( Fig. 16C, F View FIGURE 16 )................................................ 19

18(17) RTA present; sperm duct long, four-folded; embolus short, proximal area wider than the distal ( Figs 9–11 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 )............................................................................ M. dacetonoides ( Mello-Leitão, 1948) comb. nov.

- RTA absent; sperm duct short, two-folded; embolus long, proximal area as narrow as the distal ( Reiskind 1969: figs 247, 248) M. pilosus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) View in CoL

19(17) Pre-embolic ridge absent; embolus long, narrow, with spiraled tip ( Leister & Miller 2014: fig. 1D–G).......................................................................................... M. jasmineae Leister & Miller, 2014 View in CoL

- Pre-embolic ridge present; embolus short, wide, with smooth tip ( Fig. 16G, H View FIGURE 16 ).................. M. regianeae spec. nov.

20(1) Tibia I ventral spination 2-2; all eyes of similar size; abdomen strongly constricted medially ( Reiskind 1969: figs 111, 112, 153–155)...................................................................... M. lineatus (Emerton, 1909) View in CoL

- Tibia I ventral spination 3-2 or more; AME larger than other eyes; abdomen oval to round, without constriction......... 21

21(19) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or more..................................................................... 22

- Tibia I ventral spination 3-3 or 3-2....................................................................... 24

22(21) Tibia I ventral spination 5-5; two large posterior furrows (Perger & Rubio 2021: fig. 3B)................................................................................................. M. rubrofemoratus Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL

- Tibia I ventral spination 4-3 or 4-4; posterior furrows absent.................................................. 23

23(22) Tibia I ventral spination 4-3; epigyne with continuous transverse ridge and a median T-shaped sclerotization ( Fig. 20I View FIGURE 20 )........................................................................................ M. balerion spec. nov.

- Tibia I ventral spination 4-4; epigynal transverse ridge interrupted medially, median sclerotization absent ( Fig. 8I View FIGURE 8 )........................................................................................ M. niger Chickering, 1937 View in CoL

24(21) Epigyne without a transverse ridge anterior to copulatory openings ( Figs 3C View FIGURE 3 , 4J View FIGURE 4 , 16I View FIGURE 16 ).............................. 25

- Epigyne with a transverse ridge anterior to copulatory openings ( Figs 6I View FIGURE 6 , 12M View FIGURE 12 , 19I View FIGURE 19 )................................ 30

25(24) Epigyne with a posterior plate projected over epigastric groove ( Fig. 22I, J View FIGURE 22 )....................... M. ciriaco spec. nov.

- Epigyne without such a plate ( Figs 4I View FIGURE 4 , 16I View FIGURE 16 )................................................................ 26

26(25) Coxa I and II much lighter than coxae III and IV........................................................... 27

- Coxae II and III much lighter than coxae I and IV........................................................... 29

27(26) Copulatory apertures ventrally directed; epigynal plate without medial depressions ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ).................................................................................................... M. haddadi Perger & Rubio, 2021 View in CoL

- Copulatory apertures anteriorly directed; epigynal plate with medial depressions ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ).......................... 28

28(27) Anterior border of epigynal medial depressions strongly recurved ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ).................. M. olympus Reiskind, 1969 View in CoL

- Anterior border of epigynal medial depressions nearly straight ( Reiskind 1969: figs 253–254)........ M. orpheus Reiskind View in CoL

29(26) Epigyne with ventral surface wrinkled; copulatory openings directed ventrally ( Fig. 16I View FIGURE 16 )........... M. regianeae spec. nov.

- Epigyne with ventral surface smooth; copulatory openings directed laterally ( Reiskind 1969: figs 249, 250).......................................................................................... M. lineatipes Chickering, 1937 View in CoL

30(24) Epigynal transverse ridge interrupted medially ( Figs 18I View FIGURE 18 , 19I View FIGURE 19 )................................................. 31

- Epigynal transverse ridge continuous ( Figs 6I View FIGURE 6 , 24I View FIGURE 24 )......................................................... 32

31(30) Epigynal transverse ridge procurved, with marginal sclerotized area small ( Fig. 19I View FIGURE 19 ).............. M. candianii spec. nov.

- Epigynal transverse ridge recurved, with marginal sclerotized area large ( Fig. 18I View FIGURE 18 )................... M. ednae spec. nov

32(30) Wide constriction on carapace (over legs I and II); cephalic region colored differently to the thoracic ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 )............................................................................................. M. atratoides spec. nov.

- Narrow dorsal constriction on carapace (only over leg II or between I and II); cephalic region and thoracic of same color.. 33

33(32) Thoracic region elongate, at least twice the length of the cephalic region ( Figs 6B, E View FIGURE 6 , 24B, E View FIGURE 24 )........................ 34

- Thoracic region short, one and a half times the length of the cephalic region or less ( Figs 2B, E View FIGURE 2 , 11B, E View FIGURE 11 )............... 35

34(33) Abdomen white dorsally, one large spot in the middle and two white spots in posterior area ventrally; groove below the epigynal ridge absent ( Fig. 24D–F, I View FIGURE 24 ).......................................................... M. rapaxoides spec. nov.

- Abdomen completely dark; groove below the epigynal ridge present ( Fig. 6F, I View FIGURE 6 )....... M. tahyinandu Perger & Rubio, 2020 View in CoL

35(33) Longitudinal band of erect black hairs down back of thoracic region present; epigynal transverse ridge present, M-shaped ( Reiskind 1969: figs 264, 265)................................................... M. rettenmeyeri Unzicker, 1965 View in CoL

- Longitudinal band of erect black hairs down back thoracic region absent; epigynal transverse ridge otherwise ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ).. 36

36(35) Epigynal transverse ridge sinuous; primary spermathecae strongly reduced ( Reiskind 1969: figs 245–248)................................................................................... M. pilosus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898) View in CoL

- Epigynal transverse ridge V-shaped; primary spermathecae almost the same size as secondary....................... 37

37(36) Coxae II and III much clearer than I and IV; groove below the epigynal ridge present ( Reiskind 1969: figs 251, 252)........................................................................ M. fuliginosus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 View in CoL

- Coxa III never white; groove below the epigynal ridge absent ( Figs 10C View FIGURE 10 , 11F View FIGURE 11 , 12H View FIGURE 12 , 11I View FIGURE 11 , 12M View FIGURE 12 )..................................................................................... M. dacetonoides ( Mello-Leitão, 1948) comb. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Corinnidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF