Capparis diversifolia Wight & Arnott (1834: 27)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.500.2.5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5482971 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487D2-FFDE-4E51-21A1-00375DEAD7C9 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Capparis diversifolia Wight & Arnott (1834: 27) |
status |
|
Capparis diversifolia Wight & Arnott (1834: 27) View in CoL . Fig. 1
Lectotype (first step designated by Jacobs 1965):— INDIA, s.loc., s. d. Wight & Arnott 952, K000247306 (K, image!) and K000247307 (K, image!). Second-step lectotype, designated here K000247306 (K, image!); Isolectotypes K 000247307 (K, image!), G00237950 (G, image!), E00174093 (E, image!).
Distribution:— INDIA and SRI LANKA ( Sundararaghavan 1993, Maurya et al. 2020).
Notes:— While searching for the type specimen of Capparis diversifolia , we came across three specimens, two deposited at K, and one at G. The G specimen (G00237950) has annotations of De Candolle as “Herb. Wight. Propr. 952, Capparis diversifolia W. & A., Prod. by R.Wight and Arn. pg. 27, Peninsula Ind. Orientalis, 1836”, and two labels indicating “HERBIER DE CANDOLLE”, and “TYPUS”. Further, a determinavit by Jacobs (1960) indicating “Isotype of Capparis diversifolia W. & A.”. Whereas the two specimens housed at K (K000247306 and K000247307) have Wight & Arnott’s annotation, collection number ‘ 952 ’ and species number ‘ 95 ’ in “ Prodromus Florae Peninsulae Indiae Orientalis ” without mention of any locality. Further, a determinavit slip by Jacobs (1961) indicated both of them as ‘Type’ and the same is cited as holotype in his treatment ( Jacobs 1965). Much later, Noltie (2005) indicated a specimen (WC952, image!) housed in E as syntype bearing annotations by Wight & Arnott as “Herb. Wight. Propr. n 952, Capparis heterophylla W & A, Peninsula Ind. orientalis” and by Jacobs as “ Capparis diversifolia W. & A., Type, in Blumea View in CoL 12:448 (1965) ” and stated that “a specimen ex herb. Arnott with HWP label annotated by Arnott Capparis heterophylla W&A [WC] n. 952. Contemplating all, the citation of ‘Holotype’ by Jacobs (1965) has to be considered the first step lectotype of C. diversifolia as per Art. 9.17, and a correctable error following Art. 9.10 ( Turland et al. 2018). Hence, we designate K000247306 here as a second-step lectotype for C. diversifolia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Capparis diversifolia Wight & Arnott (1834: 27)
Maurya, Satish, Datar, Mandar N. & Choudhary, Ritesh Kumar 2021 |
Capparis diversifolia Wight & Arnott (1834: 27)
Wight, R. & Arnott, G. A. W. 1834: ) |